Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(popover): 'destroyOutsideClickHandler is not a function' #95

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

desmondinho
Copy link
Contributor

@desmondinho desmondinho commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling for the popover's destruction process to prevent potential errors when invoking the click handler.
    • Ensured that the click handler is only called if it has been set, improving the cleanup process and preventing memory leaks.

@desmondinho desmondinho added bug Something isn't working javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Nov 1, 2024
@desmondinho desmondinho self-assigned this Nov 1, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the destroy function in the popover module located in two JavaScript files: popover.bundle.js and popover.js. Both updates introduce a null check for the destroyOutsideClickHandler before invoking it, ensuring that it is only called if it is defined. Additionally, the handler is set to null after being called to prevent multiple invocations and manage state effectively. The core logic of popover initialization and positioning remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.* Updated destroy function to include a null check for destroyOutsideClickHandler before invocation and set it to null after calling.

Poem

In the popover's cozy nook,
A handler's checked, no need to look.
With care we tidy, set it to rest,
No more errors, we’ve done our best!
Hopping along, with joy we play,
Clean and neat, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js (1)

85-88: Consider using optional chaining for a more concise implementation.

While the current implementation is correct, you could make it more concise using optional chaining.

-    if (destroyOutsideClickHandler) {
-        destroyOutsideClickHandler();
-        destroyOutsideClickHandler = null;
-    }
+    destroyOutsideClickHandler?.();
+    destroyOutsideClickHandler = null;
src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.bundle.js (1)

1478-1481: LGTM! The null check fixes the reported issue.

The changes correctly prevent the "destroyOutsideClickHandler is not a function" error by adding a null check. Setting the handler to null after cleanup is also a good practice to prevent multiple invocations.

However, consider these additional improvements:

  1. Add error logging when destroy() is called without initialization
  2. Consider resetting other module state variables in destroy()

Here's a suggested implementation with the improvements:

 function destroy() {
     if (destroyOutsideClickHandler) {
         destroyOutsideClickHandler();
         destroyOutsideClickHandler = null;
+    } else {
+        console.warn('Popover.destroy() called before initialization');
     }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa2c0b6 and b1c2df6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.bundle.js (1 hunks)
  • src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js (2)

85-88: LGTM! The null check fixes the 'destroyOutsideClickHandler is not a function' error.

The implementation correctly prevents the error by checking if the handler exists before calling it, and properly cleans up by setting it to null afterward.


85-88: Verify the fix resolves all error scenarios.

Let's verify that this change resolves all scenarios where the error could occur.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the implementation details of the destroy method to better understand the error scenarios.


Let me check the initialization and event handling code to understand how the destroyOutsideClickHandler is set up.


Let me check the implementation of createOutsideClickHandler to fully understand the cleanup process.


The fix properly handles all error scenarios

The implementation is correct and handles all error scenarios effectively:

  1. The destroyOutsideClickHandler is only assigned during successful initialization
  2. The destroy method safely checks if handler exists before calling
  3. The handler is properly nullified after cleanup
  4. The createOutsideClickHandler correctly removes event listeners when called

The cleanup chain is complete with no potential memory leaks or dangling event listeners.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all places where destroy() is called to ensure we haven't missed any edge cases
rg -l "popover\.destroy|destroy\(\)" --type js

# Search for any remaining instances of direct destroyOutsideClickHandler calls
rg "destroyOutsideClickHandler\(\)" --type js

# Look for any tests that might need updating
fd "test|spec" -e js -e jsx -x rg -l "popover\.destroy"

Length of output: 424


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full context of destroy() method and any related code
rg -B 10 -A 10 "destroy\(\)" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js

# Look for any error handling or cleanup related code
rg "try|catch|finally|cleanup" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js

# Check for any event listeners that might be related
rg "addEventListener|removeEventListener" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js

Length of output: 717


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full context of initialize() method and any related code
rg -B 20 -A 20 "function initialize" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js

# Look for where destroyOutsideClickHandler is assigned
rg -B 5 -A 5 "destroyOutsideClickHandler =" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/popover.js

Length of output: 1774


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of createOutsideClickHandler
rg -B 10 -A 10 "createOutsideClickHandler" src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/utils/dom.js

# Check if there are any other files importing and using createOutsideClickHandler
rg -l "createOutsideClickHandler" --type js

Length of output: 880

@desmondinho desmondinho merged commit e21a37b into main Nov 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@desmondinho desmondinho deleted the fix/popover-destroy branch November 1, 2024 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant