docs(theme): add missing types; improve the 'Usage' section #73
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Blazor component Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsageCustom.html (1)
1-2: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation.The code snippet effectively demonstrates how to use a custom theme with the
LumexThemeProvidercomponent, which aligns well with the PR objective of improving the 'Usage' section. This example will be helpful for users looking to implement custom themes in their LumexUI applications.To further enhance the documentation, consider adding a brief explanation before or after the code snippet. For example:
<p>To apply a custom theme, use the <code>LumexThemeProvider</code> component and pass your theme instance to the <code>Theme</code> property:</p> <pre><code class="language-razor"><LumexThemeProvider Theme="new MyTheme()" /> </code></pre> <p>This will override the default theme with your custom <code>MyTheme</code> implementation.</p>This additional context would help users understand the purpose and impact of the code snippet more clearly.
src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/FontScale.cs (2)
7-9: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The addition of XML documentation for the
FontScalerecord is a good improvement. It follows C# documentation conventions and provides a clear, concise description.Consider expanding the documentation to include more details about the record's usage or its relationship to
BaseScale. For example:/// <summary> /// Represents a font scale, defining various size values for typography in the theme. /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// This record extends BaseScale with additional font-specific properties. /// </remarks>
12-14: LGTM! Consider naming clarity and type safety.The addition of the
Xsproperty with its XML documentation is a good improvement. The nullable string type allows for flexibility in value assignment.Consider the following suggestions:
Naming: While
Xsis concise, it might not be immediately clear to all developers. Consider a more explicit name likeExtraSmallfor better readability.Type safety: Using a string for size values provides flexibility but might lead to inconsistencies. Consider using a more specific type (e.g., a custom Size enum or struct) or adding validation to ensure consistent values.
Example refactor:
/// <summary> /// Gets or sets the extra small size value. /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// This value represents the smallest font size in the scale. /// </remarks> public string? ExtraSmall { get; set; }If you decide to keep the current implementation, ensure that there's proper validation and documentation on acceptable values for this property throughout the codebase.
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsageCreate.html (1)
1-20: Consider enhancing the documentation example for clarity and completeness.While the code structure is correct and provides a good skeleton for creating a custom theme, there are a few suggestions to improve its effectiveness as a documentation example:
The record name
MyThemeis quite generic. Consider using a more specific name that reflects a real-world use case, e.g.,CorporateBrandThemeorDarkModeOptimizedTheme.To make the example more concrete, consider adding at least one specific property in the
LayoutandColorsconfigurations. For instance:Layout = new LayoutConfig() { Spacing = 8, /* ... */ }, Colors = new ThemeColorsLight() { Primary = "#007bff", /* ... */ },
- As this is part of the documentation, it would be beneficial to add comments explaining the purpose of this code snippet and how it fits into the broader theming system. For example:
// This example demonstrates how to create a custom theme by inheriting from LumexTheme. // You can define both light and dark configurations and set a default theme. public record MyTheme : LumexTheme { // ... }These enhancements would make the documentation more informative and easier for users to adapt to their specific needs.
Would you like me to provide a revised version of this code snippet incorporating these suggestions?
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeTypesThemeConfig.html (4)
1-8: LGTM with minor suggestions for improvement.The
ThemeConfig<TColors>abstract record is well-structured and follows good practices:
- The generic constraint ensures type safety.
- The use of
initaccessors promotes immutability, which is ideal for configuration objects.Consider the following suggestions:
- Enhance the XML documentation to provide more details about the purpose and usage of this record.
- Ensure that the
LayoutConfigtype is properly defined and accessible.
10-13: LGTM with a suggestion for documentation improvement.The
ThemeConfigLightrecord is correctly implemented:
- It properly inherits from
ThemeConfig<ThemeColorsLight>.- The empty body is appropriate if no additional properties or behavior are needed.
Suggestion:
Consider enhancing the XML documentation to provide more details about how this light theme configuration differs from the base theme or what specific light theme settings it might initialize.
15-18: LGTM with a suggestion for documentation improvement.The
ThemeConfigDarkrecord is correctly implemented:
- It properly inherits from
ThemeConfig<ThemeColorsDark>.- The empty body is appropriate if no additional properties or behavior are needed.
- The symmetry with
ThemeConfigLightis good for consistency.Suggestion:
Consider enhancing the XML documentation to provide more details about how this dark theme configuration differs from the base theme or what specific dark theme settings it might initialize.
1-19: Consider enhancing the documentation with examples and usage instructions.The theme configuration records are well-structured and provide a solid foundation for a theming system. To further improve the documentation:
- Consider adding examples of how to create and use these theme configurations.
- Provide a brief explanation of how these records fit into the larger theming system.
- If there are any best practices or common pitfalls when working with these theme configurations, it would be helpful to mention them.
These additions would make the documentation more comprehensive and user-friendly.
Would you like assistance in generating example usage code or additional documentation content?
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeTypesThemeColors.html (1)
29-38: Approved: Good addition of light and dark theme color records.The introduction of
ThemeColorsLightandThemeColorsDarkrecords is a positive change that aligns with modern UI design practices, allowing for better theme customization. The inheritance fromThemeColorsensures consistency across different theme types.Consider the following suggestions for future implementation:
- Implement default color values for light and dark themes to provide out-of-the-box functionality.
- Add documentation comments for each color property to explain their intended usage in the UI.
- Consider adding a method to switch between light and dark themes dynamically.
Example implementation for
ThemeColorsLight:public record ThemeColorsLight : ThemeColors { public ThemeColorsLight() { Background = new ColorScale { Default = "#FFFFFF" }; Foreground = new ColorScale { Default = "#000000" }; // Initialize other properties with appropriate light theme values } }Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Customization/Theme/Theme.razor (3)
104-105: Improved clarity on theme usage and customization options.The updated text provides clearer guidance on how the default theme is applied and the available customization options. This improvement helps users better understand the theming system.
Consider adding a brief mention of where users can find the default theme settings for reference when overriding. For example:
After setup, the default theme will be automatically utilized. -However, if you would like to customize it, you can either override the defaults or create a completely new one. +However, if you would like to customize it, you can either override the defaults (found in `DefaultTheme.cs`) or create a completely new one.
109-110: Clear instructions for applying the custom theme.The added text and code snippet effectively demonstrate how to use the custom theme with the
LumexThemeProvider. This completes the custom theme usage example, providing users with a full picture of the process.Consider adding a brief note about the scope of the
LumexThemeProvider. For example:Then, pass it as the <Code>Theme</Code> parameter into the <Code>LumexThemeProvider</Code>. +<p>Note: The <Code>LumexThemeProvider</Code> should be placed at the root of your application to ensure the theme is applied globally.</p>
114-128: Excellent restructuring of the "Types" section.The reorganization of the "Types" section into separate subsections for each type (LumexTheme, ThemeConfig, LayoutConfig, ThemeColors) significantly improves the documentation's clarity and navigability. This structure allows users to quickly find and understand specific type information.
Consider adding brief descriptions for each type before their respective code snippets. For example:
<DocsSection Title="LumexTheme"> + <p>The <Code>LumexTheme</Code> is the main container for all theme-related configurations.</p> <CodeSnippet Code="@(new CodeBlock(name: null, snippet: "themeTypesLumexTheme"))" /> </DocsSection>Repeat this pattern for each type to provide context before the code snippets.
src/LumexUI/Components/Providers/LumexThemeProvider.razor.cs (2)
Line range hint
70-83: Consider MakingGetThemeColorsDictGeneric for ConsistencySince
GenerateThemeis now generic overTColors, consider updatingGetThemeColorsDictto accept a genericTColorsparameter. This will ensure type consistency and allowGetThemeColorsDictto handle any specific implementations ofThemeColors.Apply this diff to make
GetThemeColorsDictgeneric:-private static Dictionary<string, ColorScale> GetThemeColorsDict( ThemeColors colors ) +private static Dictionary<string, ColorScale> GetThemeColorsDict<TColors>( TColors colors ) where TColors : ThemeColors
Line range hint
42-69: Use Invariant Culture for Consistent Numeric FormattingIn the sections where numeric values are appended to the
StringBuilder, consider usingCultureInfo.InvariantCultureto avoid culture-specific formatting issues, especially for font sizes, line heights, radii, and shadows. This ensures consistent CSS output regardless of the server's culture settings.Here's how you can update the code:
-sb.AppendLine( $"--{Prefix}-font-size-tiny: {theme.Layout.FontSize.Xs};" ); +sb.AppendLine( CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, $"--{Prefix}-font-size-tiny: {theme.Layout.FontSize.Xs};" ); -sb.AppendLine( $"--{Prefix}-line-height-small: {theme.Layout.LineHeight.Sm};" ); +sb.AppendLine( CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, $"--{Prefix}-line-height-small: {theme.Layout.LineHeight.Sm};" ); -sb.AppendLine( $"--{Prefix}-radius-medium: {theme.Layout.Radius.Md};" ); +sb.AppendLine( CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, $"--{Prefix}-radius-medium: {theme.Layout.Radius.Md};" ); -sb.AppendLine( $"--{Prefix}-box-shadow-large: {theme.Layout.Shadow.Lg};" ); +sb.AppendLine( CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, $"--{Prefix}-box-shadow-large: {theme.Layout.Shadow.Lg};" );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Installation/installationConfig.html (1 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeTypesThemeColors.html (1 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeTypesThemeConfig.html (1 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsage.html (0 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsageCreate.html (1 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsageCustom.html (1 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Components/Callout.razor (0 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Customization/Theme/Theme.razor (2 hunks)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Theme/DocsTheme.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Components/Providers/LumexThemeProvider.razor.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/BaseColors.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/ThemeColors.cs (2 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/BaseScale.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/FontFamily.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/FontScale.cs (1 hunks)
- src/LumexUI/Theme/ThemeConfig.cs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Theme/themeUsage.html
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Components/Callout.razor
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Installation/installationConfig.html
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/ThemeColors.cs
- src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/BaseScale.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/LumexUI/Theme/Layout/Models/FontFamily.cs (3)
9-14: LGTM: Well-structured record definition with proper documentation.The
FontFamilyrecord is well-defined within the correct namespace. The use of XML documentation and the[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]attribute is appropriate for this data model.
15-18: LGTM: Well-documentedSansproperty.The
Sansproperty is appropriately defined as a nullable string with clear and accurate XML documentation.
20-24: LGTM: Well-documentedMonoproperty.The
Monoproperty is appropriately defined as a nullable string with clear and accurate XML documentation.src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/BaseColors.cs (2)
Line range hint
15-49: Review default values and property descriptionsThe properties of
BaseColorsnow have default values set to empty arrays ([]). This change has the following implications:
- It provides a starting point for users, ensuring that the properties are never null.
- Existing code that relies on null checks for these properties may need to be updated.
Additionally, the descriptions for
Content1,Content2, andContent3are identical. To improve clarity, consider differentiating these descriptions or explaining why they are separate properties if they serve the same purpose.Consider updating the property descriptions for
Content1,Content2, andContent3to highlight their specific uses or differences. For example:/// <summary> /// Gets or sets the primary color scale for components like card, accordion, popover, etc. /// </summary> public ColorScale Content1 { get; set; } = []; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the secondary color scale for nested components within Content1 elements. /// </summary> public ColorScale Content2 { get; set; } = []; /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the tertiary color scale for deeply nested components or special cases. /// </summary> public ColorScale Content3 { get; set; } = [];To ensure that the default values don't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any null checks on these properties:
#!/bin/bash # Search for null checks on BaseColors properties echo "Null checks on BaseColors properties:" rg --type csharp "baseColors\.(Background|Foreground|Overlay|Divider|Focus|Content1|Content2|Content3)\s*==\s*null"
10-10: Consider the implications of changing from abstract to concrete recordThe
BaseColorsclass has been changed from an abstract record to a regular record. This change allows direct instantiation ofBaseColors, which can be beneficial for flexibility. However, it's important to consider the following:
- If there were any derived classes, they might need to be updated.
- Code that relied on
BaseColorsbeing abstract may need to be reviewed and potentially updated.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any derived classes or usages that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The change from
abstractto a regularBaseColorsrecord does not impact any existing subclasses or abstract usages. Additionally, there are no null checks onBaseColorsproperties, aligning with the use of default empty arrays.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for classes that inherit from BaseColors echo "Classes inheriting from BaseColors:" rg --type csharp "class\s+\w+\s*:\s*BaseColors" # Search for abstract usages of BaseColors echo "Abstract usages of BaseColors:" rg --type csharp "abstract\s+BaseColors"Length of output: 296
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for classes that inherit from BaseColors echo "Classes inheriting from BaseColors:" rg --type csharp "class\s+\w+\s*:\s*BaseColors" # Search for abstract usages of BaseColors echo "Abstract usages of BaseColors:" rg --type csharp "abstract\s+BaseColors" # Search for null checks on BaseColors properties echo "Null checks on BaseColors properties:" rg --type csharp "baseColors\.(Background|Foreground|Overlay|Divider|Focus|Content1|Content2|Content3)\s*==\s*null"Length of output: 447
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Customization/Theme/Theme.razor (2)
107-108: Excellent addition of a custom theme creation example.The new code snippet effectively demonstrates how to create a custom theme using the
GenerateThememethod. This practical example will be valuable for users looking to customize their themes.
140-145: Navigation structure updated to match content changes.The
_headingsarray has been correctly updated to reflect the new structure of the "Types" section. This ensures that the navigation accurately represents the content organization, improving the overall user experience.src/LumexUI/Theme/ThemeConfig.cs (7)
12-13: Good use of generics to enhance flexibilityThe introduction of the generic type parameter
TColorsinThemeConfig<TColors>enhances flexibility and type safety by allowing different color configurations for themes.
15-19: Proper addition of the Colors propertyThe
Colorsproperty is correctly defined with the generic typeTColors, and the accompanying documentation is clear. This allows for theme-specific color configurations.
20-24: Layout property initialization is appropriateThe addition of the
Layoutproperty withgetandinitaccessors is appropriate. The documentation properly explains its purpose.
25-26: Internal access modifier for Type propertyThe
Typeproperty is marked asinternal, which is suitable if the property's accessibility is intended to be limited within the assembly. Confirm that this aligns with the desired encapsulation level.
27-36: Constructor correctly initializes propertiesThe constructor initializes
Type,Colors, andLayoutappropriately. The use ofnew TColors()relies on thenew()constraint, ensuring thatTColorshas a parameterless constructor.
42-47: Updated inheritance enhances type safety for light theme
ThemeConfigLightnow inherits fromThemeConfig<ThemeColorsLight>, which enhances type safety by associating the light theme with its specific colors. The constructor correctly calls the base constructor withThemeType.Light.
53-58: Updated inheritance enhances type safety for dark theme
ThemeConfigDarknow inherits fromThemeConfig<ThemeColorsDark>, ensuring that the dark theme uses the appropriate color configuration. The constructor correctly calls the base constructor withThemeType.Dark.
| Light = new ThemeConfigLight() | ||
| { | ||
| Layout = new LayoutConfig() | ||
| { | ||
| FontFamily = fontFamily, | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Dark theme is still referenced in multiple test and code files, which may cause null references or test failures if the Dark theme configuration is removed without addressing these dependencies.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of removing the Dark theme configuration
The Dark theme configuration has been removed from the constructor. Please ensure that this change is intentional and that any references to the Dark theme are appropriately handled to prevent null references or unexpected behavior.
Run the following script to check for references to the Dark theme in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to the 'Dark' theme in the codebase.
# Test: Find all occurrences of 'Dark' theme usage. Expect: Only valid references or none if deprecated.
rg --type cs 'Dark\.' -A 3
Length of output: 5630
| @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ public LumexThemeProvider() | |||
| Theme = new(); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| private string GenerateTheme( ThemeConfig theme ) | |||
| private string GenerateTheme<TColors>( ThemeConfig<TColors> theme ) where TColors : ThemeColors, new() | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update GenerateTheme Method Calls with Generic Type
The GenerateTheme method has been updated to include a generic type parameter <TColors>. However, the current calls in LumexThemeProvider.razor are missing this type argument:
@((MarkupString)GenerateTheme(Theme.Light))(Line 5)@((MarkupString)GenerateTheme(Theme.Dark))(Line 9)
Please update these calls to include the appropriate generic type, for example:
@((MarkupString)GenerateTheme<ThemeLight>(Theme.Light))
@((MarkupString)GenerateTheme<ThemeDark>(Theme.Dark))Ensure that the specified types (ThemeLight, ThemeDark, etc.) comply with the ThemeColors constraints.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Updates to All GenerateTheme Method Calls
The GenerateTheme method has been updated to be generic over TColors. Please ensure that all calls to GenerateTheme within the codebase have been updated to match the new generic signature to prevent any compile-time errors.
Run the following script to locate all usages of GenerateTheme:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of the GenerateTheme method in the codebase.
# Test: Search for all invocations of GenerateTheme
rg --type cs --no-heading --line-number '\bGenerateTheme\b'
Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of the GenerateTheme method in the entire codebase.
# Search for all invocations of GenerateTheme in .cs and .razor files
rg '\bGenerateTheme\b' --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type cs --type razor --no-heading --line-number
Length of output: 487
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Colors/colorsCommonScale.html (3)
4-4: Consider enhancing naming for clarity and type safety.While the name
Blueis clear, consider the following suggestions:
- Rename to
BlueScaleorBluePaletteto better indicate its purpose.- Consider using an enum for keys instead of strings to improve type safety.
Example:
public enum ColorShade { Shade50 = 50, Shade100 = 100, // ... other shades ... Shade950 = 950 } public readonly static Dictionary<ColorShade, string> BlueScale = new() { [ColorShade.Shade50] = "#eff6ff", // ... other entries ... };
1-3: Enhance XML documentation for better clarity.Consider expanding the XML documentation to provide more context and usage information. For example:
/// <summary> /// Represents a scale of blue colors ranging from very light (50) to very dark (950). /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// Use this scale for consistent blue theming across the application. /// Access colors using string keys (e.g., Blue["500"] for the middle shade). /// </remarks>This provides more context about the range of colors and how to use the dictionary.
4-17: Consider adding accessibility guidelines for color usage.To promote accessible design, consider:
- Adding a comment or documentation section about using these colors accessibly.
- Providing links to color contrast checking tools.
- Identifying pairs of shades that meet WCAG 2.1 AA contrast requirements for common use cases (e.g., text on background).
Example addition to documentation:
/// <remarks> /// ... existing remarks ... /// For accessible use, ensure sufficient contrast when using these colors for text and backgrounds. /// Use a contrast checker (e.g., https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/) to verify accessibility. /// Recommended high-contrast pairs: /// - Text on background: 900 on 50, 50 on 900 /// - UI elements: 100 on 700, 700 on 100 /// </remarks>src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/BaseColors.cs (4)
38-40: Approve rename and documentation update with a minor suggestion.The rename from
Content1toSurface1and the updated documentation improve clarity. The empty array initialization is consistent with other properties.Consider adding examples of specific components in the documentation for better understanding:
/// <summary> -/// Gets or sets the color scale for the background of components like card, accordion, popover and etc. +/// Gets or sets the color scale for the background of components like cards, accordions, popovers, etc. /// </summary>
43-45: Approve rename but suggest documentation differentiation.The rename from
Content2toSurface2is consistent with the previous change. However, the documentation is identical toSurface1.Consider revising the documentation to differentiate between
Surface1andSurface2:/// <summary> -/// Gets or sets the color scale for the background of components like card, accordion, popover and etc. +/// Gets or sets the color scale for the secondary background of components, providing depth or hierarchy in the UI. /// </summary>
48-50: Approve rename but suggest documentation differentiation.The rename from
Content3toSurface3is consistent with the previous changes. However, the documentation is identical toSurface1andSurface2.Consider revising the documentation to differentiate between
Surface1,Surface2, andSurface3:/// <summary> -/// Gets or sets the color scale for the background of components like card, accordion, popover and etc. +/// Gets or sets the color scale for the tertiary background of components, providing additional depth or emphasis in the UI hierarchy. /// </summary>
Line range hint
1-51: Overall assessment of BaseColors changesThe modifications to the
BaseColorsclass improve naming consistency and provide a more flexible foundation for color theming. The renaming ofContent1/2/3toSurface1/2/3better reflects their purpose as background colors for UI components.However, there are a few points to consider:
- The removal of the
abstractmodifier may impact extensibility if inheritance was part of the original design.- The documentation for
Surface1,Surface2, andSurface3could be more specific to differentiate their roles in the UI hierarchy.These changes lay a good foundation for a robust theming system, but careful consideration of the class's role in the broader architecture is advised.
Consider documenting the intended use of this class in the broader theming system, possibly in a class-level comment. This would help developers understand how to effectively use and extend the
BaseColorsclass in their themes.docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Colors/colorsSemanticCustom.html (2)
5-31: LGTM! Well-structured light theme configuration with room for minor improvement.The light theme configuration is comprehensive and well-documented. The use of color scales and default colors provides good flexibility. However, for consistency, consider using the same approach for all color definitions.
For improved consistency, consider refactoring the
Primarycolor definition to match the style ofBackgroundandForeground:Primary = [ - .. Colors.Orange, - new("default", Colors.Orange["600"]), // KeyValuePair<string, string> - new("foreground", Colors.Black), + new ColorScale( + colors: Colors.Orange, + defaultKey: "600", + foregroundColor: Colors.Black + ), ],This change would make the
Primarycolor definition more consistent with the other color definitions while maintaining the same functionality.
33-49: LGTM! Consistent dark theme configuration with a suggestion for completeness.The dark theme configuration follows the same structure as the light theme, which is excellent for maintaining consistency across the theme. The color choices are appropriate for a dark theme.
Consider expanding the example to include all color definitions mentioned in the "rest of the colors" comment. This would provide a more comprehensive example for users implementing custom themes. If the full example is too long, you could add a link to the complete theme configuration documentation.
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/ColorSwatches.razor (3)
4-8: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider adding a fallback for null Scale.The null check on
Scaleis good for preventing runtime errors, and the conditional class for ordering enhances responsive design. The grid layout is appropriate for displaying color swatches.Consider adding a fallback message or empty state when
Scaleis null to improve user experience. For example:@if (Scale is not null) { // Existing content } else { <div>No color scale available.</div> }
25-31: LGTM: Good implementation of default color indicator.The default color indicator is well-implemented, using
TryGetValueto safely check for the "default" key. This feature enhances user understanding of the color scale.Consider extracting the default indicator symbol ("●") to a constant or configuration value for easier maintenance and potential localization.
49-52: LGTM: Well-defined component parameters.The component parameters are well-defined with appropriate types and the use of
[EditorRequired]ensures proper usage.Consider adding XML documentation comments to provide more context about these parameters, especially regarding the expected structure of the
ColorScaletype. For example:/// <summary> /// The title to display above the color swatches. /// </summary> [Parameter, EditorRequired] public string Title { get; set; } = default!; /// <summary> /// The color scale to display, represented as a collection of color key-value pairs. /// </summary> [Parameter, EditorRequired] public ColorScale Scale { get; set; } = default!;docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Components/Button.razor (1)
43-43: Approved: Fully qualified component name improves clarity.The change to use the fully qualified name for the
Colorscomponent (<LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Button.PreviewCodes.Colors />) is good. It improves clarity and prevents potential naming conflicts.For consistency, consider updating other similar component references (e.g.,
<Usage />,<Disabled />, etc.) to use fully qualified names as well, if they are from the same namespace.src/LumexUI/LumexUI.csproj (1)
86-87: Approved: Enhanced visibility for documentation purposes.The addition of
InternalsVisibleToattributes forLumexUI.DocsandLumexUI.Docs.Clientaligns with the PR objective of improving documentation. This change allows the documentation projects to access internal members of the main LumexUI library, which can lead to more comprehensive and accurate documentation.However, it's important to note:
- Exposing internals should be done judiciously to maintain proper encapsulation.
- Ensure that only necessary internal members are accessed by the documentation projects.
- Consider documenting this decision in the project's architectural documentation for future reference.
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/SemanticColors.cs (1)
9-12: LGTM! Consider enhancing the class documentation.The change from
internaltopublicvisibility and the addition of XML documentation are good improvements. They enhance the usability and clarity of theSemanticColorsclass.Consider expanding the class documentation to briefly explain the purpose of the
LightandDarkproperties, as they seem to be the main components of this class.docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Customization/Colors.razor (3)
5-75: LGTM: Well-structured and informative content.The documentation is well-organized, using
DocsSectioncomponents effectively. The explanations of common and semantic colors are clear and provide good context. The inclusion of code snippets and examples is helpful for users.Consider adding a brief example of how to use semantic colors in a component to make the documentation more actionable for users.
80-108: LGTM: Well-defined headings and color scales.The
_headingsarray accurately reflects the structure of the documentation. The_colorScalesarray provides a comprehensive set of color scales for the documentation.Consider adding dark theme colors (
SemanticColors.Dark) to provide a complete picture of the theming system. This could be implemented as a toggle between light and dark themes in the UI.
110-121: LGTM: Proper initialization and good use of C# features.The
OnInitializedmethod correctly sets up the layout with relevant metadata. TheColorScaleInforecord is a good use of C# 9.0+ features for creating a simple data structure.Consider moving the
ColorScaleInforecord definition to the top of the@codeblock for better code organization and readability.src/LumexUI/Styles/Accordion.cs (1)
23-23: LGTM! Consider updating documentation if needed.The change from "bg-content1" to "bg-surface1" for the
AccordionVariant.Shadowappears to be a deliberate styling update. This modification aligns with the summary provided and likely reflects a refinement in the design system or specific styling for the Shadow variant of the Accordion.If there's any user-facing documentation or design system guidelines that reference these background classes, consider updating them to reflect this change.
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs/Pages/Customization/Theme.razor (3)
107-110: Good addition of custom theme creation example.The new code snippet and instructions for applying a custom theme are valuable additions to the documentation. They provide clear guidance for users who want to customize the theme.
For consistency, consider using "custom theme" instead of "it" in the sentence:
-Then, pass it as the <Code>Theme</Code> parameter into the <Code>LumexThemeProvider</Code>. +Then, pass the custom theme as the <Code>Theme</Code> parameter into the <Code>LumexThemeProvider</Code>.
122-128: Good addition of LayoutConfig and ThemeColors subsections.The new subsections for "LayoutConfig" and "ThemeColors" further enhance the organization of the "Types" section. This consistent structure makes it easier for users to understand and navigate the different components of the theming system.
For consistency with the other subsections, consider adding a brief introductory sentence before each code snippet. For example:
<DocsSection Title="LayoutConfig"> <p>The LayoutConfig type defines the layout settings for the theme:</p> <CodeSnippet Code="@(new CodeBlock(name: null, snippet: "themeTypesLayoutConfig"))" /> </DocsSection>
Line range hint
1-158: Overall improvements to documentation structure and clarity.The changes made to this file significantly enhance the documentation for theme customization in LumexUI. Key improvements include:
- Clearer explanation of default theme usage and customization options.
- Addition of a custom theme creation example.
- Improved organization of the "Types" section with separate subsections for each type.
- Consistent use of code snippets to illustrate the structure of different theme-related types.
- Updated headings array to accurately reflect the new document structure.
These changes will greatly benefit users by providing more comprehensive and easily navigable documentation for the theming system.
For future enhancements, consider adding a visual representation (e.g., a diagram) of how the different theme-related types interact with each other and the overall theming system. This could help users better understand the relationships between LumexTheme, ThemeConfig, LayoutConfig, and ThemeColors.
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Colors.cs (1)
490-496: Improved ReverseColorValues method with a suggestionThe
ReverseColorValuesmethod has been updated to accept anIReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>, which is consistent with the changes to the color scale properties. The new LINQ implementation is more concise and functional, improving readability.However, for complete consistency with the immutability pattern established in the color scale properties, consider returning an
IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>instead of a mutableDictionary<string, string>. This would ensure that the reversed color scale is also immutable.Here's a suggested modification:
- internal static Dictionary<string, string> ReverseColorValues( IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string> colorScale ) + internal static IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string> ReverseColorValues( IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string> colorScale ) { return colorScale.Keys .Zip( colorScale.Values.Reverse(), ( key, reversedValue ) => new { Key = key, Value = reversedValue } ) - .ToDictionary( x => x.Key, x => x.Value ); + .ToDictionary( x => x.Key, x => x.Value ) + .AsReadOnly(); }This change would make the returned dictionary read-only, consistent with the other color scales in the class.
🛑 Comments failed to post (5)
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Samples/Colors/colorsCommonScale.html (1)
1-18: 💡 Codebase verification
Centralize the
BlueDictionary Definition in the CodebaseThe
Bluedictionary is actively used in the codebase at:
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/SemanticColors.csTo ensure consistency and maintainability:
- Move the
Bluedictionary fromcolorsCommonScale.htmlto a centralized.csfile within the project structure (e.g.,LumexUI/Theme/ColorScales.cs).- Update the documentation to reference the centralized
Bluedictionary, ensuring that both documentation and implementation remain synchronized.🔗 Analysis chain
Clarify the purpose of this file and consider code location.
The current file location and format suggest this is a documentation example. If this
Bluedictionary is actually used in the project:
- Consider moving the C# code to a proper
.csfile in the main project structure (e.g.,LumexUI/Theme/ColorScales.cs).- Update this documentation file to reference the actual code file, ensuring documentation stays in sync with the implementation.
If this is purely for documentation:
- Clearly indicate at the top of the file that this is a code example, not the actual implementation.
- Consider using a documentation generator that can pull actual code into documentation to ensure accuracy.
To help determine the purpose and usage of this code, you can run the following command:
This will help verify if the
Bluedictionary is used in the actual codebase outside of the documentation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the Blue dictionary in .cs files rg --type csharp 'Blue\[".+"\]' -g '!docs/'Length of output: 633
docs/LumexUI.Docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/ColorSwatches.razor (1)
9-45: 💡 Codebase verification
Issue Identified: Incomplete Luminance Calculation in
ColorUtilsThe
Luminancemethod inColorUtils.csonly handles the "transparent" color by returning0and does not perform any luminance calculation for other colors. This incomplete implementation could cause theGetReadableColormethod to always returnColors.Blackfor non-transparent colors, regardless of their actual luminance.Recommendations:
Implement Full Luminance Calculation: Ensure that the
Luminancemethod accurately calculates the luminance for all color inputs to determine the correct readable color.Handle Edge Cases: Verify that
Luminanceappropriately handles edge cases, such as invalid color formats or extreme luminance values.Unit Testing: Add unit tests for
GetReadableColorto validate that it returns the correct color based on various background colors.🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM with questions: Well-structured color swatch rendering with responsive design.
The color swatch rendering loop is well-implemented with good attention to detail, such as filtering out specific keys and special handling for the "divider" key. The responsive design considerations are commendable.
A few points to consider:
Is using
LumexButtonfor color swatches intentional? While it ensures consistency with the UI library, it might be overloading the button's semantic meaning.The opacity adjustment for the "divider" color (line 18) uses string concatenation. Consider using a more robust method to ensure valid color values.
The readability of text on color swatches (line 21) is a good accessibility consideration. However, verify if
ColorUtils.GetReadableColor()handles edge cases well.To verify the
ColorUtilsimplementation, you can run:This will help us review the
GetReadableColormethod implementation for potential improvements or edge cases.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the ColorUtils class implementation ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class ColorUtils { $$$ GetReadableColor($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the GetReadableColor method in C# files rg -A 5 -B 5 'GetReadableColor' --type csharpLength of output: 7922
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the Luminance method implementation in C# files rg -A 5 -B 5 'Luminance' --type csharpLength of output: 1324
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/ThemeColors.cs (1)
63-65: 💡 Codebase verification
Remaining Usage of Old Property Names Found
The verification script identified existing usages of
Content1,Content2, andContent3in the following locations:
src/LumexUI/Components/Providers/LumexThemeProvider.razor.cstests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/Providers/ThemeProviderTests.csPlease update these instances to use the new
Surface1,Surface2, andSurface3properties to ensure consistency and prevent potential issues.🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Property names updated, verify usage
The change from
Content1/2/3toSurface1/2/3appears to be a deliberate shift in terminology. This change improves consistency with modern UI design concepts where "surface" is commonly used to describe different layers or areas of the interface.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the old property names:
If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use the new Surface1/2/3 properties.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of Content1/2/3 in the codebase # Test: Search for Content1, Content2, Content3 usage rg --type csharp -i '\bContent[123]\b'Length of output: 1063
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/SemanticColors.cs (1)
38-38: 💡 Codebase verification
Remaining Uses of
ContentProperties FoundThe renaming of
Content1,Content2, andContent3toSurface1,Surface2, andSurface3respectively was partially incomplete.Remaining instances found in:
tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/Providers/ThemeProviderTests.cssrc/LumexUI/Components/Providers/LumexThemeProvider.razor.csPlease update these files to ensure consistency across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consistent renaming of properties.
The renaming of
Content1,Content2, andContent3toSurface1,Surface2, andSurface3respectively is consistent and appears to reflect a change in terminology.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of the old
Contentterminology:Also applies to: 42-42, 46-46
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of Content1, Content2, or Content3 rg -i '\b(Content[123])\b' --type csLength of output: 1092
src/LumexUI/Theme/Colors/Models/ColorScale.cs (1)
12-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address the TODO: Consider implementing
IDictionaryThe TODO comment at line 12 suggests questioning why
ColorScaleis not implementingIDictionary. Since the class now includes methods and properties that align closely withIDictionary<TKey, TValue>, implementingIDictionary<string, string>may provide more complete functionality and make the class more intuitive for users who expect dictionary-like behavior.Would you like assistance in refactoring the class to implement
IDictionary<string, string>?
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #73 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.95% 96.96%
=======================================
Files 70 70
Lines 1542 1544 +2
Branches 150 150
=======================================
+ Hits 1495 1497 +2
Misses 28 28
Partials 19 19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ColorSwatchescomponent for displaying color collections.ThemeConfig.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Button,Colors, andThemepages for improved clarity and organization.Chores