feat(docs): add the Numbox page #114
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several updates to the Lumex UI documentation and components, particularly focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@desmondinho has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (44)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Step.razor (1)
1-5: Consider adding Min/Max constraints for temperature inputSince this is a temperature input example, it would be more realistic and provide better UX to include reasonable minimum and maximum temperature constraints.
Consider adding Min/Max parameters:
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" Class="max-w-xs" - step="0.5" /> + Step="0.5" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" />The suggested range:
- Min: -273.15°C (absolute zero)
- Max: 1000°C (a reasonable upper limit for most practical uses)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor (1)
3-5: Consider simplifying the component usage.A few suggestions to improve the code:
- The
new()constructor could be more explicit about its type- Setting
name: nullis redundant if it's the default- The fully qualified component path could be simplified with a
@usingdirectiveConsider applying these changes:
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples + -<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.Colors")"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.Colors /> +<PreviewCode Code="@new PreviewCodeOptions(snippet: "Numbox.Code.Colors")"> + <Colors /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/MinMax.razor (1)
4-4: Consider simplifying the component namespace structure.The current path
LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.MinMaxis quite deep. Consider reorganizing the documentation structure to reduce nesting levels, which could improve maintainability.A flatter structure could look like:
- Move examples to a dedicated examples folder:
LumexUI.Docs.Examples.Numbox.MinMax- Or use a shorter path:
LumexUI.Docs.Components.NumboxExamples.MinMaxdocs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor (1)
4-4: Consider adding a @using directive for cleaner code.The fully qualified namespace makes the code more verbose. Consider adding a
@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examplesat the top of the file for improved readability.@rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly +@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples <PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly")"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.ReadOnly /> + <ReadOnly /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor (1)
3-5: Consider using named parameters for better code clarityWhile the code is functionally correct, the constructor parameter usage could be more explicit.
Consider this more readable alternative:
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.LabelPlacements")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@(new() { Name = null, Snippet = "Numbox.Code.LabelPlacements" })">docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor (1)
1-5: Well-structured documentation component.The component follows a clean documentation pattern by separating:
- The actual example implementation (in Examples/)
- The preview wrapper (this file)
- The code snippet (referenced via PreviewCode)
This separation of concerns makes the documentation maintainable and consistent.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor (1)
3-6: Improve code clarity with named parameters and using directives.Consider these readability improvements:
- Use named parameters for better clarity in the tuple construction
- Add a using directive to simplify the example component reference
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples + -<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.CustomStyles")" +<PreviewCode Code="@(new { name = (string?)null, snippet = "Numbox.Code.CustomStyles" })" PreviewClasses="@_classes"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.CustomStyles /> + <CustomStyles /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor (2)
6-6: Fix typo in placeholder textThere's a typo in the placeholder text: "temperatute" should be "temperature".
- Placeholder="Enter the temperatute" + Placeholder="Enter the temperature"
1-18: LGTM with a suggestion for enhancementThe implementation demonstrates good practices:
- Proper type safety with
TValue="double?"- Reasonable debounce delay for temperature input
- Clear visual feedback with the value display
Consider adding min/max validation to ensure reasonable temperature values.
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" DebounceDelay="250" Behavior="@InputBehavior.OnInput" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" Clearable="@true" Class="max-w-xs" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" @bind-Value="@_value" />docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/_Radius.razor (1)
5-11: Consider improving the clarity of the examples.While the implementation is functional, consider these improvements for better user experience:
- The label "Radius" is identical for all instances, which might be confusing. Consider including the radius value in the label.
- The hardcoded Value="25" could be parameterized for flexibility.
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Radius="@radius" - Label="Radius" + Label="@($"Radius {radius}")" Placeholder="@radius.ToString()" - Value="25" /> + Value="@DefaultValue" />Then in the @code block:
private const double DefaultValue = 25;docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Sizes.razor (3)
5-8: Consider adding aria-label for better accessibilityWhile the visual presentation is good, the example could benefit from improved accessibility.
- <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Size="@size" Label="Temperature °C" /> + <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Size="@size" Label="Temperature °C" AriaLabel="Temperature input with size @size" /> - <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Size="@size" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" /> + <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Size="@size" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" AriaLabel="Temperature input with placeholder and size @size" />
15-19: Consider using C# 12's collection expressions appropriatelyThe array initialization uses the new collection expression syntax correctly. However, since this is a documentation example, consider adding a comment explaining this modern C# feature for developers who might be new to it.
private Size[] _sizes = [ + // Using C# 12's collection expressions for concise array initialization Size.Small, Size.Medium, Size.Large ];
1-12: Consider adding more comprehensive size examplesWhile the current examples show basic usage, consider enhancing the documentation by:
- Adding examples with different number formats
- Showing validation behavior at different sizes
- Demonstrating min/max value constraints
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Variants.razor (2)
5-8: Consider enhancing the responsive layout and examplesThe flex layout looks good but could be improved:
- Add min-width to prevent components from becoming too narrow
- Consider showing different numeric values/formats for each variant
- Add validation examples to demonstrate error states
- <div class="w-full flex flex-wrap gap-4 md:flex-nowrap"> - <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Variant="@variant" Label="Temperature °C" /> - <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Variant="@variant" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" /> + <div class="w-full flex flex-wrap gap-4 md:flex-nowrap"> + <div class="min-w-[200px] flex-1"> + <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" + Variant="@variant" + Label="Temperature °C" + Value="23.5" /> + </div> + <div class="min-w-[200px] flex-1"> + <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" + Variant="@variant" + Label="Temperature °C" + Placeholder="Enter the temperature" + ValidationMessage="Please enter a valid temperature" /> + </div>
6-7: Consider adding accessibility attributesFor better accessibility, consider adding aria labels or tooltips to indicate the purpose of these input fields in the documentation.
- <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Variant="@variant" Label="Temperature °C" /> + <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" + Variant="@variant" + Label="Temperature °C" + AriaDescription="Example of @variant variant without placeholder" />docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor (4)
1-1: Consider enhancing the responsive layout.The current single-column grid layout could be improved for larger screens to better utilize the available space.
-<div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4"> +<div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3 gap-4">
6-7: Consider adding input validation and localization.The temperature input fields could benefit from:
- Input validation constraints (min/max values)
- Localized labels for international users
-<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" LabelPlacement="@placement" Label="Temperature °C" /> +<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" + LabelPlacement="@placement" + Label="@Localizer["Temperature °C"]" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" /> -<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" LabelPlacement="@placement" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" /> +<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" + LabelPlacement="@placement" + Label="@Localizer["Temperature °C"]" + Placeholder="@Localizer["Enter the temperature"]" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" />
9-9: Improve the placement text display.The placement value display could be enhanced with proper text casing for better readability.
-<small class="text-default-400 mt-1">@placement</small> +<small class="text-default-400 mt-1">@placement.ToString().Replace("_", " ")</small>
15-18: Enhance code maintainability with documentation and immutability.Consider adding XML documentation and making the array immutable.
+ /// <summary> + /// Defines the available label placement options for the Numbox examples. + /// </summary> - private LabelPlacement[] _labelPlacements = [ + private readonly LabelPlacement[] _labelPlacements = [ LabelPlacement.Inside, LabelPlacement.Outside ];docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Colors.razor (2)
1-13: Enhance accessibility and user experienceWhile the layout is clean and responsive, consider these improvements:
- Add aria-labels to distinguish between different colored numboxes
- Add a description explaining the purpose of different colors
- Consider adding min/max constraints for temperature input
<div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4 md:grid-cols-2"> @foreach( var color in _colors ) { <div> <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Color="@color" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" - Value="25" /> + Value="25" + aria-label="@($"Temperature input with {color} theme")" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" /> <small class="text-default-400 mt-1">@color</small> </div> } </div> +<p class="text-sm text-default-400 mt-4"> + Different colors represent various states or importance levels of the input field. +</p>
15-25: Improve code organization and documentationThe colors array is well-structured, but consider these enhancements:
- Mark the array as
constsince it's immutable- Add XML documentation explaining when to use each color
@code { - private ThemeColor[] _colors = [ + /// <summary> + /// Defines the available theme colors for numbox with their typical usage: + /// - Default: Standard input fields + /// - Primary: Main actions or important fields + /// - Secondary: Alternative or supporting fields + /// - Success: Valid or completed inputs + /// - Warning: Requires attention + /// - Danger: Error states or critical inputs + /// - Info: Informational or helper inputs + /// </summary> + private const ThemeColor[] _colors = [ ThemeColor.Default, ThemeColor.Primary, ThemeColor.Secondary, ThemeColor.Success, ThemeColor.Warning, ThemeColor.Danger, ThemeColor.Info ]; }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ClearButton.razor (2)
1-9: Consider enhancing the example with more realistic constraints.While the basic setup is good, consider adding temperature-specific constraints to make this example more practical:
- Add
MinandMaxattributes for reasonable temperature ranges- Include validation messages for out-of-range values
- Consider adding a unit selector (°C/°F)
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Clearable="@true" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" Value="@_value" Variant="@InputVariant.Outlined" OnCleared="@Notify" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" + ValidationMessage="Temperature must be between -273.15°C and 1000°C" Class="max-w-xs" />
11-11: Enhance accessibility for status messages.The status text should be more accessible and visually informative.
-<p class="text-sm text-default-500">@_text</p> +<p class="text-sm text-default-500" role="status" aria-live="polite"> + @if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(_text)) + { + <span class="inline-flex items-center"> + <span class="material-icons text-info-500 mr-1">info</span> + @_text + </span> + } +</p>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor (3)
1-11: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA labels for better accessibility.The implementation demonstrates clean two-way binding using the
@bind-Valuedirective. The responsive layout and value display effectively showcase the functionality.Consider adding ARIA labels for better accessibility:
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Label="Value" Placeholder="Enter any value" Clearable="@true" + AriaLabel="First number input example" @bind-Value="@_valueOne" />
13-23: Add comments explaining the different binding approaches.While the implementation is correct, it would be helpful to document why one might choose explicit
ValueandValueChangedproperties over@bind-Value. This would help developers understand the tradeoffs between the two approaches.Add a comment block above the second example:
+ @* This example demonstrates explicit Value/ValueChanged properties, + which provide more control over value updates compared to @bind-Value *@ <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Label="Value" Placeholder="Enter any value" Clearable="@true" Value="@_valueTwo" ValueChanged="@OnValueChanged" />
26-34: Consider simplifying the event handler and documenting the initial value.The code is functionally correct, but could be improved for maintainability.
Consider these improvements:
@code { private double? _valueOne; + // Initial value of 25 used to demonstrate pre-populated input private double? _valueTwo = 25; - private void OnValueChanged( double? value ) - { - _valueTwo = value; - } + // Simplified event handler using lambda expression + private void OnValueChanged(double? value) => _valueTwo = value; }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/CustomStyles.razor (3)
1-8: Consider enhancing the demo with additional featuresWhile the basic setup is good, consider these improvements for a more comprehensive demo:
- Add validation constraints for realistic temperature ranges
- Include an OnValueChanged handler to demonstrate value updates
- Consider adding unit conversion support (C° to F°)
Here's a suggested enhancement:
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Label="Temperature °C" Placeholder="Enter the temperature" Radius="@Radius.Large" Clearable="@true" StartContent="@_thermometer" - Value="25" + Value="@_temperature" + Min="-273.15" + Max="1000" + OnValueChanged="@HandleTemperatureChanged" Classes="@_classes" />
11-15: Consider using IconSize enum instead of hardcoded stringThe icon size is currently hardcoded as a string. Consider using the IconSize enum if available in the LumexIcon component for better type safety and maintainability.
private RenderFragment _thermometer = @<LumexIcon Icon="@Icons.Rounded.Thermometer" - Size="@new("20")" + Size="@IconSize.Medium" Class="text-secondary-400 shrink-0"> </LumexIcon>;
17-34: Document the styling classes and consider performance implicationsThe styling implementation uses multiple backdrop filters which might impact performance on lower-end devices. Consider:
- Adding comments to explain the purpose of each styling group
- Evaluating if all backdrop effects are necessary
- Consider extracting these styles into a dedicated CSS class for reusability
Example documentation:
private InputFieldSlots _classes = new() { Label = "text-default-700", InnerWrapper = "bg-transparent", InputWrapper = ElementClass.Empty() + // Shadow and background effects .Add( "shadow-xl" ) .Add( "bg-default-200/50" ) + // Glassmorphism effects - Note: May impact performance .Add( "backdrop-blur-xl" ) .Add( "backdrop-saturate-200" ) + // Interactive states .Add( "hover:bg-default-200/70" ) .Add( "group-data-[focus=true]:bg-default-200/85" ) .ToString(),docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor (4)
4-13: Improve component naming and color handlingA few suggestions to enhance the code:
- The event handler name
OnAgeChangeseems incorrect for temperature handling- The color logic could be simplified and the success state might not be necessary for a neutral input
Consider this improvement:
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?" Variant="@InputVariant.Outlined" Label="Temperature °C" Required="@true" ErrorMessage="@_userValidator.TempErrorMessage" Invalid="@(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(_userValidator.TempErrorMessage))" - Color="@(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(_userValidator.TempErrorMessage) ? ThemeColor.Danger : ThemeColor.Success)" + Color="@(string.IsNullOrEmpty(_userValidator.TempErrorMessage) ? null : ThemeColor.Danger)" Value="@_user.Temperature" - ValueChanged="@OnAgeChange" + ValueChanged="@OnTemperatureChange" Class="max-w-xs" />
19-23: Use appropriate numeric literal for double valueThe initialization uses a float literal (
-274.15f) for a double value, which could lead to precision loss.- _user.Temperature = -274.15f; + _user.Temperature = -274.15d;
31-45: Simplify validation result processingThe error message extraction logic can be simplified using LINQ's more concise methods.
private void Validate() { var result = _userValidator.Validate(_user); - if (!result.IsValid) - { - _userValidator.TempErrorMessage = result.Errors - .Where(failure => failure.PropertyName == nameof(User.Temperature)) - .Select(failure => failure.ErrorMessage) - .FirstOrDefault(); - } - else - { - _userValidator.TempErrorMessage = null; - } + _userValidator.TempErrorMessage = result.Errors + .FirstOrDefault(failure => failure.PropertyName == nameof(User.Temperature)) + ?.ErrorMessage; }
1-3: Add XML documentation for the componentConsider adding XML documentation to describe the component's purpose and usage.
+/// <summary> +/// Example component demonstrating LumexNumbox validation with FluentValidation. +/// Shows temperature input validation against absolute zero. +/// </summary> @using FluentValidation @using FluentValidation.Resultssrc/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexBooleanInputBase.cs (1)
Line range hint
37-41: Consider adding XML documentation for the validation behavior.The method's behavior of not providing validation messages by default should be documented using XML comments to help developers understand the design decision.
Add XML documentation:
+ /// <summary> + /// Sets the validation message for this input. + /// This base implementation returns a completed task as boolean inputs don't provide validation messages by default. + /// </summary> + /// <returns>A completed <see cref="ValueTask"/>.</returns> protected override ValueTask SetValidationMessageAsync() { // This component doesn't have a validation message by default. return ValueTask.CompletedTask; }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/StartEndContent.razor (3)
5-9: Enhance accessibility by including units in labelsThe temperature inputs should include the unit (°C) in the
Labelattribute instead of just the placeholder for better accessibility and clarity.-Label="Temperature °C" +Label="Temperature (°C)"Also applies to: 30-34, 55-60
83-86: Standardize icon sizes and consider making them configurableIcon sizes vary between components (20 vs 16) without clear reasoning. Consider standardizing the size or making it configurable through a parameter.
-Size="@new("20")" +Size="@IconSize" @code { + [Parameter] public string IconSize { get; set; } = "20"; }Also applies to: 89-92, 95-98
117-119: Consider expanding currency options and making them configurableThe currency list is hardcoded with only three options. Consider making it configurable and including more common currencies.
@code { private record Currency(string Code, string Symbol); private static readonly Currency[] Currencies = new[] { new Currency("USD", "$"), new Currency("EUR", "€"), new Currency("GBP", "£"), // Add more currencies as needed }; }src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputBase.cs (1)
234-237: Enhance documentation for SetValidationMessageAsync.While the method's purpose is clear, the documentation could be more detailed about:
- When this method is called
- What types of validation it should perform
- Whether it should consider both parsing and business rule validation
- How it relates to form-level validation
Consider expanding the documentation like this:
/// <summary> -/// Asynchronously sets the validation message if any. +/// Asynchronously sets the validation message based on the current input state. +/// This method is called after value parsing and should implement component-specific validation logic. +/// It may consider: +/// - Value parsing results +/// - Business rule validation +/// - Custom validation requirements /// </summary> /// <returns>A <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation.</returns>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor (5)
1-20: LGTM! Consider adding code examples for nullable types.The introduction effectively explains the component's purpose and supported types. The reference to the textbox component provides good context.
Consider adding simple code examples demonstrating the usage of nullable types (e.g.,
int?,double?) to make it more concrete for users.
128-135: Consider expanding the error message documentation.While the current documentation explains the basic usage of error messages, it would be beneficial to:
- Add examples of common validation scenarios
- Explain how to handle multiple validation states
- Document any built-in validation features
102-105: Consider moving the callout closer to the label placement section.The callout contains important information about label placement defaults but appears after several unrelated sections. Consider moving it immediately after the "Label Placements" section for better context and discoverability.
212-216: Consider documenting additional related components.The API components section could be enhanced by including other related components that are commonly used with Numbox, such as:
- Form components that might wrap the Numbox
- Validation-related components
174-196: Maintain consistent casing in heading names.Some heading names use different casing styles:
- "Error message" vs "Error Message"
- "Two-way Data Binding" vs other headings
Consider standardizing the casing across all headings for better consistency.src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs (1)
Line range hint
193-197: Fix indentation in the else block.The logic to default
LabelPlacementtoOutsidewhen no label is provided is a good defensive programming practice. However, the indentation of the else block should be aligned with the preceding if block for consistency.- else if( !parameters.TryGetValue<string>( nameof( Label ), out var _ ) ) - { - LabelPlacement = LabelPlacement.Outside; - } + else if( !parameters.TryGetValue<string>( nameof( Label ), out var _ ) ) + { + LabelPlacement = LabelPlacement.Outside; + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (41)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/MinMax.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Step.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Variants.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/_Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Description.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/MinMax.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Required.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Step.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexBooleanInputBase.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputBase.cs(3 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (13)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Description.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Disabled.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/MinMax.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ReadOnly.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Required.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Usage.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/DebounceDelay.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Description.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Disabled.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Required.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor
🔇 Additional comments (35)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Step.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for enabling client-side interactivity of the Numbox component.
3-5: Verify the code snippet reference and consider path aliasing.
The implementation looks correct, but there are a couple of points to verify and improve:
Let's verify the code snippet reference exists:
Consider simplifying the long component path by:
- Using a shorter namespace alias at the top of the file
- Moving the examples to a more concise folder structure
-<LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.Step />
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples
+
+<Step />✅ Verification successful
The refactoring suggestion for namespace aliasing is valid and follows project patterns
The verification shows that:
- The Step component exists at the correct location (
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Step.razor) - Many other component files in the project use the
@usingdirective for the Components namespace - The code snippet reference pattern "Numbox.Code.Step" is used in the file
The suggestion to use namespace aliasing is consistent with the project's patterns, as evidenced by similar usage across multiple component files. The proposed refactoring would improve readability while maintaining consistency with the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of "Numbox.Code.Step" snippet
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\.Step"
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the snippet content exists in a code file
rg -l "Code\.Step" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Shared/Code/
Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other files using the same long namespace path
rg -l "LumexUI\.Docs\.Client\.Pages\.Components\.Numbox\.Examples\.Step"
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any using statements already in the file
rg -A 5 "@using" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Step.razor
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the code snippets are stored in a different location
fd -t f "Code" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
Length of output: 353
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the Step.razor file to understand the structure
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Step.razor
Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the Step component exists in the Examples folder
fd -t f "Step.razor" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples
# Let's also check if there are any other files in the project using similar namespace patterns
rg -l "@using LumexUI\.Docs\.Client\.Pages\.Components"
Length of output: 1161
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Sizes.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is the correct choice for interactive component examples.
3-5: Verify the referenced components and consider adding a description.
The structure looks good, but let's verify the dependencies and consider adding context.
Let's verify the referenced components exist:
Consider adding a brief description above the preview to help users understand the purpose of the size variations:
@rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly
+<p>
+ The Numbox component supports different sizes to fit various layout requirements.
+ Choose from small, medium, or large sizes to match your design needs.
+</p>
+
<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.Sizes")">
<LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.Sizes />
</PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is the correct choice for interactive documentation components.
3-3: Verify the referenced code snippet exists.
Ensure that the "Numbox.Code.Colors" snippet is properly defined in the codebase.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/MinMax.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is the correct choice for Numbox examples as they require client-side interactivity.
3-5: Verify the PreviewCode configuration and component reference.
Please verify:
- Is the
nullname parameter intentional? Most documentation examples typically have descriptive names. - Does the snippet "Numbox.Code.MinMax" exist in the codebase?
Let's verify the configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have enough information to verify the concerns:
PreviewCode configuration is consistent with codebase patterns
The search results show that:
- The
nullname parameter is consistently used across all PreviewCode components in the documentation (100+ examples) - The snippet naming pattern "ComponentName.Code.ExampleName" is consistently followed throughout the codebase
- The component reference path follows the standard documentation structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the snippet exists and if other examples follow the same pattern
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\." docs/
# Check if other PreviewCode usages have null names
rg -A 2 "PreviewCode Code=\"@new\(name:" docs/
Length of output: 65225
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor (1)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for enabling client-side interactivity in the documentation.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor (1)
1-1: LGTM! Correct rendermode for interactive functionality.
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive is appropriately used to enable client-side interactivity for the Numbox preview.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Variants.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Correct render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is appropriate here as it enables client-side interactivity for the Numbox component demonstrations.
3-5: Consider using named parameters for better code clarity.
While the code is functional, using named parameters would improve readability and maintainability.
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.Variants")">
+<PreviewCode Code="@(new() { Name = null, Snippet = "Numbox.Code.Variants" })">Also, verify that the code snippet "Numbox.Code.Variants" exists in the codebase.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ErrorMessage.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for this interactive documentation component.
3-5: Consider improving the PreviewCode configuration.
A few suggestions to enhance the code:
- The
nameparameter is explicitly set tonullwhich seems unnecessary. Consider removing it if it's optional. - The component reference path is quite long. Consider moving the example component to a closer directory or using a shorter alias.
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.ErrorMessage")">
+<PreviewCode Code="@new(snippet: "Numbox.Code.ErrorMessage")">Also, verify that the referenced example component and code snippet exist:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM: Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive is correctly used here, as it's necessary for interactive documentation components that need to run in the browser.
3-5: Verify the example code snippet exists
Ensure that the referenced code snippet "Numbox.Code.LabelPlacements" is properly defined in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to verify the actual content and implementation of the code snippet.
Code snippet exists and is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The
LabelPlacements.razorfile exists in the PreviewCodes directory - The corresponding example component exists and is properly implemented in the Examples directory
- The example demonstrates different label placement options for the Numbox component
- The code structure follows the same pattern as other Numbox examples in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition or usage of the LabelPlacements code snippet
# Look for the snippet definition
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\.LabelPlacements" --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type razor
# Look for similar snippet definitions to verify the pattern
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\." --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type razor
Length of output: 1640
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the LabelPlacements.razor file and its corresponding example
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/LabelPlacements.razor
echo "---"
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/LabelPlacements.razor
Length of output: 1062
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive is correctly used here, ensuring the component is interactive in the documentation.
3-5: Verify the code snippet and example component references.
The component structure looks good, but let's verify the referenced paths exist.
✅ Verification successful
All referenced paths exist and are correctly used
Both the code snippet definition and example component are present in the expected locations:
- Code snippet:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/StartEndContent.razor - Example component:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/StartEndContent.razor
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the referenced code snippet and example component
# Check for the code snippet definition
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\.StartEndContent"
# Check for the example component
fd "StartEndContent.razor" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples"
Length of output: 288
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/CustomStyles.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate rendering mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly rendering mode is well-suited for this documentation component as it enables client-side interactivity.
9-13: Consider documenting the styling choices and verify gradient compatibility.
The styling configuration looks good, but consider:
- Adding comments to explain the styling choices for future maintainers
- Verifying the gradient compatibility across different browsers
private Preview.Slots _classes = new()
{
+ // Gradient background with disabled masking for better visibility
Background = "bg-gradient-to-tr from-indigo-200 to-violet-300 [mask-image:none]",
+ // Center the preview content for better presentation
Preview = "justify-center"
};✅ Verification successful
Gradient and mask-image styles are consistently used across components
The gradient and mask-image patterns are used consistently across multiple components in the documentation:
- Same gradient pattern (
bg-gradient-to-tr from-indigo-200 to-violet-300) is used in both Numbox and Textbox components - The
[mask-image:none]property is consistently applied in similar styling contexts - These styles are part of a broader design system that includes various gradient patterns across components
The styling choices are well-documented in the codebase, with extensive Tailwind CSS integration and documentation. No browser compatibility issues are evident as the patterns follow standard Tailwind CSS conventions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar gradient and mask-image patterns in the codebase
# to ensure consistent styling approaches
# Search for gradient patterns
echo "Checking gradient patterns:"
rg "bg-gradient-to-tr.*from-.*to-" --type razor
# Search for mask-image overrides
echo "\nChecking mask-image patterns:"
rg "\[mask-image:none\]" --type razor
Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without specifying the file type since .razor files might not be recognized
# and search for gradient patterns in all files
# Search for gradient patterns
echo "Checking gradient patterns:"
rg "bg-gradient-to-tr.*from-.*to-"
# Search for mask-image overrides
echo -e "\nChecking mask-image patterns:"
rg "\[mask-image:none\]"
# Also check for any documentation about gradients or styling
echo -e "\nChecking for styling documentation:"
rg -i "gradient|tailwind|style guide" "docs/"
Length of output: 11347
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/_Radius.razor (3)
1-1: LGTM! Well-structured responsive grid layout.
The grid layout appropriately handles different screen sizes using Tailwind's responsive classes.
16-21: LGTM! Clean implementation of radius options.
Good use of collection expressions (C# 12) and comprehensive coverage of radius options.
10-10: Verify color contrast for accessibility.
The text-default-400 class is used for the radius label. Please ensure this provides sufficient color contrast for accessibility.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Sizes.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM: Responsive grid layout implementation
The use of w-full and grid classes with single column layout provides a good foundation for responsive design.
6-7: Verify null handling in the Numbox component
Since TValue is set to double?, we should ensure that the component properly handles null values for documentation purposes.
✅ Verification successful
Null handling is properly implemented in the Numbox component
The code inspection reveals that null handling is properly implemented in the LumexNumbox component:
- The
FormatValueAsStringmethod explicitly handles null values as the first case in the switch expression - The component correctly handles nullable numeric types through
Nullable.GetUnderlyingTypein theGetStepAttributeValuemethod - The generic type parameter
TValueproperly flows through the inheritance chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for null handling in the LumexNumbox component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexNumbox<$_> {
$$$
// Look for null checks or handling
$_($$$) {
if ($_ == null) {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the LumexNumbox implementation
fd "LumexNumbox" --type f
# Then let's look for any files that might contain the implementation
rg "class LumexNumbox" -A 10
Length of output: 1052
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the LumexNumbox implementation more thoroughly
cat src/LumexUI/Components/Numbox/LumexNumbox.razor.cs
# Also check the base class since it inherits from LumexInputFieldBase
rg "class LumexInputFieldBase" -A 20
Length of output: 5814
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/Variants.razor (1)
15-19: Verify .NET version compatibility and variant coverage
The code uses C# collection expressions syntax which requires .NET 8. Also, please verify if all supported variants are covered.
Consider adding a comment indicating the default variant for documentation purposes.
private InputVariant[] _variants = [
+ // Default variant
InputVariant.Flat,
InputVariant.Outlined,
InputVariant.Underlined
];✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to find the InputVariant enum definition since it wasn't found in the previous results.
Let me get the complete enum definition since it was cut off.
Collection expressions and variants are correctly implemented
The code is compatible as all projects target .NET 8, and all available InputVariant enum values (Flat, Outlined, Underlined) are correctly included in the array. The suggestion to document the default variant remains valid but is a minor enhancement.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if we're missing any InputVariant values
ast-grep --pattern 'enum InputVariant {
$$$
}'
# Check .NET version in the project file
fd -e csproj | xargs cat
Length of output: 8270
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for InputVariant enum definition using ripgrep for better context
rg "enum InputVariant" -A 10
Length of output: 672
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete InputVariant enum definition
cat src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/InputVariant.cs
Length of output: 614
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ClearButton.razor (1)
1-30: Verify documentation integration.
Please ensure this example is properly integrated into the documentation system.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation integration is properly implemented
The ClearButton example is correctly integrated into the documentation system:
- It's referenced in the main Numbox.razor documentation under a dedicated "Clear Button" section
- It follows the consistent styling pattern (max-w-xs) used across other examples
- It's properly set up in the preview code system with the correct rendering mode
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this example is referenced in the main Numbox documentation
rg -l "ClearButton" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/
# Check for consistent styling with other examples
fd -e razor . docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ -x grep -l "max-w-xs"
Length of output: 972
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the main Numbox documentation to verify proper integration
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor
# Check the preview code to ensure it matches
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ClearButton.razor
Length of output: 8349
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/TwoWayDataBinding.razor (1)
1-34: Verify documentation integration.
As this is a documentation example, we should verify that it's properly referenced and accessible in the main documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual references to understand how this example is integrated.
Documentation integration is properly implemented
The example is correctly integrated into the documentation:
- Referenced in the main Numbox documentation with proper context about two-way data binding
- Has a corresponding preview code file that correctly references the example
- The example is placed under a documentation section with appropriate explanatory text
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of this example in the documentation
# Check if this example is referenced in the main Numbox documentation
rg -l "TwoWayDataBinding" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/
# Check if there's a corresponding preview code file
fd "TwoWayDataBinding" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/
Length of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how TwoWayDataBinding is referenced in the main documentation
rg -A 5 -B 5 "TwoWayDataBinding" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor
# Check if the preview code matches the example
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/TwoWayDataBinding.razor
Length of output: 808
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexBooleanInputBase.cs (1)
Line range hint 37-41: LGTM! Verify derived class implementations.
The simplified signature aligns well with the class's behavior of not providing validation messages by default.
Let's verify the impact on derived classes:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! No impact on derived classes found
The verification shows that there are two derived classes (LumexSwitch and LumexCheckbox), but neither of them overrides the SetValidationMessageAsync method. They inherit the default implementation from LumexBooleanInputBase which simply returns ValueTask.CompletedTask. The signature change is safe and consistent with the class hierarchy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all classes that inherit from LumexBooleanInputBase and override SetValidationMessageAsync
# Search for derived classes that might be affected by the signature change
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : LumexBooleanInputBase {
$$$
protected override ValueTask SetValidationMessageAsync($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find derived classes
# First, find all files that might contain derived classes
rg -l "LumexBooleanInputBase" --type cs
# Then, let's look for class declarations that inherit from it
rg "class.*:.*LumexBooleanInputBase" --type cs
# Additionally, let's search for any SetValidationMessageAsync implementations
rg "SetValidationMessageAsync" --type cs -C 2
Length of output: 2755
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs (1)
36-36: LGTM! Verify component readiness
The removal of NavItemStatus.Soon from LumexNumbox<T> aligns with adding its documentation page. However, let's verify that all necessary documentation and examples are in place.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation is complete and well-structured
The Numbox component documentation is comprehensive and production-ready, containing:
- Complete documentation page with detailed explanations
- 18 example components covering all features:
- Basic usage, validation, styling options
- Advanced features like two-way binding and debounce
- Proper API documentation references
- Detailed slot documentation and customization options
The removal of NavItemStatus.Soon is justified as the component is fully documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of Numbox documentation files and examples
# Check for Numbox documentation pages
echo "Checking for Numbox documentation files..."
fd -e razor "Numbox.*\.razor$" docs/
# Check for required documentation sections (examples, API docs)
echo "Checking for documentation content..."
rg -l "LumexNumbox" docs/ --type md --type razor
Length of output: 359
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the documentation content more accurately
# Check content of the Numbox documentation page
echo "=== Checking Numbox.razor content ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor"
# Search for any markdown files containing Numbox documentation
echo -e "\n=== Checking for markdown documentation ==="
fd -e md . docs/ -x grep -l "Numbox"
# Check if there are example sections in the Razor file
echo -e "\n=== Checking for examples in documentation ==="
rg "Example" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor"
Length of output: 8473
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the example implementations
# Check for example components in the PreviewCodes directory
echo "=== Checking example implementations ==="
fd -e razor . "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes"
# Check content of one of the example files to verify quality
echo -e "\n=== Checking content of Usage example ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor" 2>/dev/null || echo "Usage.razor not found"
# Verify if component is properly referenced in API documentation
echo -e "\n=== Checking API documentation references ==="
rg "LumexNumbox" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Api" -l
Length of output: 2108
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/StartEndContent.razor (1)
17-21: Standardize placeholder format for decimal values
The price input's placeholder "0.00" suggests 2 decimal places, but there's no validation enforcing this format. Consider adding format validation or removing the decimal suggestion if not enforced.
Also applies to: 42-46, 69-74
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Placeholder format is consistent with decimal handling in Numbox component
The placeholder "0.00" is appropriate as the LumexNumbox component properly handles decimal values using BindConverter.FormatValue with CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, which ensures consistent decimal formatting. The component:
- Uses proper decimal value formatting through its
FormatValueAsStringimplementation - Handles decimal values with culture-invariant formatting
- Maintains consistency between input and display formats
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any validation or formatting logic for decimal inputs
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
decimal $_ {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any validation or formatting logic related to decimal values in Numbox component
rg -g "*.{cs,razor}" -A 5 "decimal.*Numbox"
# Search for any format or validation properties in Numbox component
rg -g "*.{cs,razor}" -A 5 "Format|Validation.*Numbox"
# Search for any decimal format patterns in the codebase
rg -g "*.{cs,razor}" "0[.]00|[#]{1,}[.][0]{1,}"
Length of output: 84104
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputBase.cs (1)
187-188: Consider optimizing validation message updates.
The validation message is now set after every value change, which could be unnecessary if the value is valid. Consider only setting the validation message when parsing fails or when specific validation rules are violated.
Let's verify the validation behavior across different input components:
✅ Verification successful
The validation message update is correctly implemented
The current implementation is appropriate because:
SetValidationMessageAsyncis an abstract method that allows derived components to implement their own validation strategyLumexInputFieldBaseimplements proper HTML validation message checking via JS interopLumexBooleanInputBaseoptimizes by skipping validation when not needed- The validation is tied to the input's value parsing state (
_parsingFailed)
The original concern about performance is unfounded as the implementation allows for component-specific optimization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how other input components handle validation message updates
# Look for patterns in validation message setting across the codebase
# Search for overrides of SetValidationMessageAsync
ast-grep --pattern 'protected override ValueTask SetValidationMessageAsync()'
# Look for similar validation patterns in other input components
rg -l "SetValidationMessageAsync" --type cs
Length of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the validation message handling in these files
# Check LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs
echo "=== LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs ==="
rg "SetValidationMessageAsync" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs -B 2 -A 5
# Check LumexBooleanInputBase.cs
echo -e "\n=== LumexBooleanInputBase.cs ==="
rg "SetValidationMessageAsync" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexBooleanInputBase.cs -B 2 -A 5
# Check the test file to understand expected behavior
echo -e "\n=== InputBaseTests.cs ==="
rg "SetValidationMessageAsync" tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/Bases/InputBaseTests.cs -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 1322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual implementation in LumexInputBase.cs to understand the validation flow
echo "=== LumexInputBase.cs validation implementation ==="
rg "SetValidationMessageAsync" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputBase.cs -B 5 -A 10
# Also check for any validation-related state management
echo -e "\n=== Validation state management in LumexInputBase.cs ==="
rg "Invalid|ValidationMessage" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputBase.cs -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1775
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor (2)
218-227: LGTM! Layout initialization is properly implemented.
The OnInitialized method correctly sets up all necessary metadata for the documentation page.
158-167: Verify the CustomStyles component implementation.
The slots documentation is comprehensive, but let's ensure the CustomStyles component properly demonstrates the usage of these slots.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific CustomStyles implementation for the Numbox component.
CustomStyles component properly demonstrates slot customization
The CustomStyles component implementation correctly demonstrates the usage of slots through the Classes property, showing practical examples of styling various parts of the Numbox component including:
- Label styling (
text-default-700) - Inner wrapper styling (
bg-transparent) - Input wrapper styling with multiple classes for different states
- Input element styling with placeholder customization
The implementation aligns with the documented slots and provides a comprehensive example of custom styling capabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if CustomStyles component exists and contains examples for all slots
# Look for the CustomStyles component implementation
fd CustomStyles.razor
Length of output: 2178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of CustomStyles component for Numbox
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/CustomStyles.razor
# Also check the slots definition to compare against
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Numbox.razor | grep -A 20 "_slots"
Length of output: 3152
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs (1)
254-258: Verify performance impact of unconditional validation.
The simplified validation logic improves code maintainability. However, since the validation message is now always retrieved from JavaScript regardless of validation state, we should verify:
- The performance impact of making unconditional JavaScript calls
- Consistency with validation behavior in other input components
Let's check for similar validation patterns in other input components:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the validation patterns and base class implementation to better understand the context.
Let me try one more search pattern to find validation-related implementations:
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Unconditional validation call is appropriate and consistent with component design
The implementation is correct and well-designed because:
- The validation is centralized in the base class
LumexInputFieldBase<TValue>and consistently inherited by all input components (LumexNumbox, LumexTextbox) - The JavaScript implementation shows proper validation message retrieval for standard HTML input elements
- The unconditional call is necessary as the validation state needs to be synchronized with the browser's native validation state, which can change due to various user interactions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check validation patterns in other input components
# Look for similar validation message retrieval patterns
# Search for validation message retrieval patterns
rg -A 5 "getValidationMessage" --type cs
# Search for other SetValidationMessageAsync implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'protected override async ValueTask SetValidationMessageAsync() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 745
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for base class implementation and other validation-related patterns
# Look for the base class definition that defines SetValidationMessageAsync
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
protected virtual async ValueTask SetValidationMessageAsync() {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for other validation-related patterns
rg -A 5 "Invalid\s*=.*ValidationMessage" --type cs
# Look for other JavaScript module invocations for validation
rg -A 5 "_jsModule.InvokeAsync.*validation" --type cs
Length of output: 234
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation-related implementations in input components
# Look for base class and derived class implementations
rg -A 10 "class.*InputFieldBase" --type cs
# Search for other validation message handling
rg -A 5 "ValidationMessage\s*=" --type cs
# Look for any JavaScript validation-related code
fd . -e js -x grep -A 5 "getValidationMessage"
Length of output: 3901
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Temperature °C" | ||
| Placeholder="Enter the temperature" | ||
| Class="max-w-xs" | ||
| step="0.5" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the casing of the step parameter
The step attribute should be in PascalCase to match Blazor conventions.
Apply this diff:
<LumexNumbox TValue="double?"
Label="Temperature °C"
Placeholder="Enter the temperature"
Class="max-w-xs"
- step="0.5" />
+ Step="0.5" />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | |
| Label="Temperature °C" | |
| Placeholder="Enter the temperature" | |
| Class="max-w-xs" | |
| step="0.5" /> | |
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | |
| Label="Temperature °C" | |
| Placeholder="Enter the temperature" | |
| Class="max-w-xs" | |
| Step="0.5" /> |
| <PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code._Radius")"> | ||
| <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples._Radius /> | ||
| </PreviewCode> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Code snippet reference "Numbox.Code._Radius" appears to be missing
The example component _Radius.razor exists and contains valid code demonstrating radius variations, but the referenced code snippet "Numbox.Code._Radius" is not found in the codebase. This needs to be addressed to ensure the documentation works correctly.
- The example component exists at:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/_Radius.razor - The code snippet "Numbox.Code._Radius" is referenced but not defined in any visible location
- Consider creating the missing code snippet or updating the reference to an existing one
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the example component and code snippet.
The implementation looks correct, but let's verify a few things:
- The existence of the referenced code snippet "Numbox.Code._Radius"
- The corresponding example component in the correct namespace
Additionally, consider these suggestions for improved maintainability:
- The example component path is quite long. Consider using a using directive at the top of the file to shorten it.
- The
name: nullparameter could be omitted if it's not required.
Here's a cleaner version:
@rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code._Radius")">
- <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples._Radius />
+<PreviewCode Code="@new(snippet: "Numbox.Code._Radius")">
+ <_Radius />
</PreviewCode>Let me verify the content of the example component and code snippet to ensure they match.
Let me check if the code snippet "Numbox.Code._Radius" exists and contains the correct example code.
Let me check for code snippets in other common file extensions since we didn't find a Code.cs file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of related components and code snippets
# Check for the example component
echo "Checking for the example component..."
fd -e razor "_Radius.razor" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples"
# Check for the code snippet definition
echo "Checking for the code snippet..."
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\._Radius" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client"
Length of output: 449
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files
echo "Content of example component (_Radius.razor):"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/_Radius.razor"
echo -e "\nContent of code snippet reference (Radius.razor):"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor"
Length of output: 1138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the code snippet definition
echo "Searching for Numbox.Code._Radius definition:"
rg -A 20 "Numbox\.Code\._Radius" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
# Search for any Code.cs files that might contain the snippet definitions
echo -e "\nSearching for Code.cs files in the Numbox directory:"
fd "Code.cs" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox"
Length of output: 722
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for code snippet files with different extensions
echo "Searching for potential code snippet files:"
fd -e cs -e razor "Code" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox"
# Search for any file containing the Radius example code
echo -e "\nSearching for files containing the Radius example code pattern:"
rg -l "Radius\.(None|Small|Medium|Large)" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox"
Length of output: 555
| <PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly")"> | ||
| <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.Numbox.Examples.ReadOnly /> | ||
| </PreviewCode> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Code snippet "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly" needs to be added as an embedded resource
The verification reveals that while the code references the snippet "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly", the corresponding HTML resource file is missing. The CodeSnippet component expects the snippet content to be available as an embedded resource with a ".html" extension.
- Add the HTML resource file for "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly" containing the code from Examples/ReadOnly.razor
- Ensure it's properly embedded in the assembly
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the code snippet reference exists.
The implementation looks correct, but we should verify that the "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly" snippet exists in the codebase to prevent runtime errors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly" snippet definition
# Expected: Find the corresponding code snippet file or definition
# Look for files that might contain the snippet definition
rg -l "Numbox\.Code\.ReadOnly"
# Look for potential snippet files in the Numbox directory
fd -e cs -e razor "ReadOnly" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox
Length of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of both ReadOnly files to verify the snippet definition
echo "=== Content of PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/PreviewCodes/ReadOnly.razor"
echo -e "\n=== Content of Examples/ReadOnly.razor ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/Numbox/Examples/ReadOnly.razor"
# Also search for any code snippet registration or configuration files
rg -l "Code\s*=\s*\"Numbox\.Code\.ReadOnly\"" --type razor
Length of output: 850
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any code snippet registration patterns in the codebase
# First, let's look for files that might contain snippet registrations
rg -l "snippet.*Numbox"
# Also search for any files that might define or handle code snippets
fd -e cs -e razor "Snippet" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
# Let's also check if there's a configuration or registration file for code snippets
fd -e json -e cs "snippet" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
Length of output: 1710
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the CodeSnippet component to understand how snippets are handled
echo "=== Content of CodeSnippet.razor.cs ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/CodeSnippet.razor.cs"
echo -e "\n=== Content of CodeSnippet.razor ==="
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/CodeSnippet.razor"
Length of output: 2404
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for embedded resources containing the snippet
echo "=== Checking for embedded resources ==="
find . -type f -name "*.html" | grep -i "Numbox.Code.ReadOnly"
# Let's also check the Common directory for CodeBlock definition
echo -e "\n=== Content of CodeBlock definition ==="
find docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common -type f -exec grep -l "CodeBlock" {} \; -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 854
| @code { | ||
| private string? _text; | ||
| private double? _value = 25; | ||
|
|
||
| private void Notify() | ||
| { | ||
| _value = default; | ||
|
|
||
| if( string.IsNullOrEmpty( _text ) ) | ||
| { | ||
| _text = "Input is cleared!"; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| _text += " ..and again.."; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve state management and documentation.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The message concatenation could grow indefinitely
- Missing documentation for this example component
- No way to reset the status message
+/// <summary>
+/// Example component demonstrating the clearable feature of LumexNumbox
+/// with temperature input and status notifications.
+/// </summary>
@code {
private string? _text;
private double? _value = 25;
+ private int _clearCount = 0;
private void Notify()
{
_value = default;
+ _clearCount++;
- if( string.IsNullOrEmpty( _text ) )
- {
- _text = "Input is cleared!";
- }
- else
- {
- _text += " ..and again..";
- }
+ _text = _clearCount == 1
+ ? "Input is cleared!"
+ : $"Input cleared {_clearCount} times";
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @code { | |
| private string? _text; | |
| private double? _value = 25; | |
| private void Notify() | |
| { | |
| _value = default; | |
| if( string.IsNullOrEmpty( _text ) ) | |
| { | |
| _text = "Input is cleared!"; | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| _text += " ..and again.."; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Example component demonstrating the clearable feature of LumexNumbox | |
| /// with temperature input and status notifications. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| @code { | |
| private string? _text; | |
| private double? _value = 25; | |
| private int _clearCount = 0; | |
| private void Notify() | |
| { | |
| _value = default; | |
| _clearCount++; | |
| _text = _clearCount == 1 | |
| ? "Input is cleared!" | |
| : $"Input cleared {_clearCount} times"; | |
| } | |
| } |
| public class User | ||
| { | ||
| public double? Temperature { get; set; } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public class UserValidator : AbstractValidator<User> | ||
| { | ||
| public string? TempErrorMessage { get; set; } | ||
|
|
||
| public UserValidator() | ||
| { | ||
| RuleFor( user => user.Temperature ) | ||
| .NotNull().WithMessage( "Temperature can't be null" ) | ||
| .GreaterThan( -273.15f ).WithMessage( "Temperature cannot be lower than or equal to absolute zero" ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve validator design and numeric precision
Several architectural improvements could be made:
- The
TempErrorMessageproperty doesn't follow SRP and shouldn't be part of the validator - The temperature validation uses float precision instead of double
- Consider registering the validator for dependency injection
Consider these improvements:
+ private string? _tempErrorMessage;
+
public class User
{
public double? Temperature { get; set; }
}
public class UserValidator : AbstractValidator<User>
{
- public string? TempErrorMessage { get; set; }
-
public UserValidator()
{
RuleFor(user => user.Temperature)
.NotNull().WithMessage("Temperature can't be null")
- .GreaterThan(-273.15f).WithMessage("Temperature cannot be lower than or equal to absolute zero");
+ .GreaterThan(-273.15d).WithMessage("Temperature cannot be lower than or equal to absolute zero");
}
}And in your Program.cs:
builder.Services.AddScoped<IValidator<User>, UserValidator>();| <div class="grid gap-4"> | ||
| <div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4"> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div class="w-full flex flex-wrap gap-4 md:flex-nowrap"> | ||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Temperature °C" | ||
| Placeholder="25" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_thermometerIcon" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Distance" | ||
| Placeholder="100" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_distanceIcon" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="decimal?" | ||
| Label="Price" | ||
| Placeholder="0.00" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_euroSymbolIcon" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <small class="text-default-500 mt-1">Start</small> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4"> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div class="w-full flex flex-wrap gap-4 md:flex-nowrap"> | ||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Temperature °C" | ||
| Placeholder="25" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| EndContent="@_thermometerIcon" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Distance" | ||
| Placeholder="100" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| EndContent="@_distanceIcon" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="decimal?" | ||
| Label="Price" | ||
| Placeholder="0.00" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| EndContent="@_euroSymbolIcon" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <small class="text-default-500 mt-1">End</small> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="w-full grid grid-cols-1 gap-4"> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div class="w-full flex flex-wrap gap-4 md:flex-nowrap"> | ||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Temperature °C" | ||
| Placeholder="25" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_thermometerIcon" | ||
| EndContent="@_tempCelsiusContent" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="double?" | ||
| Label="Distance" | ||
| Placeholder="100" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_distanceIcon" | ||
| EndContent="@_kmContent" /> | ||
|
|
||
| <LumexNumbox TValue="decimal?" | ||
| Label="Price" | ||
| Placeholder="0.00" | ||
| LabelPlacement="@LabelPlacement.Outside" | ||
| StartContent="@_euroSymbolIcon" | ||
| EndContent="@_currenciesContent" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <small class="text-default-500 mt-1">Both</small> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring repeated sections into a reusable component
The three sections (Start, End, Both) share identical structure and differ only in content placement. Consider creating a reusable component to reduce code duplication.
Create a new component like this:
@code {
public record NumboxGroup(
string Label,
string Placeholder,
RenderFragment StartContent,
RenderFragment EndContent
);
[Parameter] public IEnumerable<NumboxGroup> Groups { get; set; }
[Parameter] public string Position { get; set; }
}Usage example:
<NumboxSection Position="Start" Groups="@_numboxGroups" />| @<div class="flex items-center"> | ||
| <label class="sr-only" for="currency">Currency</label> | ||
| <select class="outline-none border-0 bg-transparent text-default-400 text-small" | ||
| id="currency" | ||
| name="currency" | ||
| @onclick:stopPropagation="@true"> | ||
| <option>USD</option> | ||
| <option>ARS</option> | ||
| <option>EUR</option> | ||
| </select> | ||
| </div>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add proper event handling for currency selector
The currency selector lacks @onchange event handling and the selected value isn't bound to any property. This makes it non-functional in its current state.
<select class="outline-none border-0 bg-transparent text-default-400 text-small"
id="currency"
name="currency"
+ @bind="SelectedCurrency"
+ @onchange="OnCurrencyChanged"
@onclick:stopPropagation="@true">Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
LumexNumboxcomponent for numeric input, including various configurations such as clearable, read-only, required, and custom styles.LumexNumboxwith features like debounce delay, min/max values, label placements, and different size variants.Improvements
Documentation
LumexNumboxconfigurations and features.