fix(upgrade): nil panic due to field unassigned #79
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances the project's structure and functionality, refining the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant Git
participant LocalNet
participant App
Developer->>Git: Modify .gitignore
Git-->>Developer: Update exclusions
Developer->>LocalNet: Rename and add Makefile targets
LocalNet-->>Developer: Improved local management
Developer->>App: Add new keepers
App-->>Developer: Enhanced functionality
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
orisalden
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
app/upgrades/types.go (1)
51-55: Ensure consistency in pointer usage for keepers.The keepers
BTCStakingKeeper,AgentKeeper,PlanKeeper, andTokenKeeperare inconsistently used as both pointers and non-pointers in the codebase. This inconsistency could lead to potential issues.
BTCStakingKeeperis defined as a pointer intypes.gobut used as a non-pointer inapp.go.AgentKeeperis defined as a pointer intypes.gobut used as a non-pointer inapp.go.PlanKeeperis defined as a pointer intypes.gobut used as a non-pointer inapp.go.TokenKeeperis defined as a pointer intypes.gobut used as a non-pointer inapp.go.Please ensure that these keepers are consistently used as pointers throughout the codebase.
Analysis chain
Ensure consistency in pointer usage for keepers.
The keepers
BTCStakingKeeper,AgentKeeper,PlanKeeper, andTokenKeeperare now defined as pointer types. Verify that this change is consistent throughout the codebase and does not introduce any issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of pointer usage for keepers in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of each keeper as a pointer type. Expect: Consistent usage of pointer types. rg --type go -A 5 $'BTCStakingKeeper \*btcstakingkeeper.Keeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'AgentKeeper \*agentkeeper.Keeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'PlanKeeper \*plankeeper.Keeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'TokenKeeper \*tokenkeeper.Keeper'Length of output: 1016
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of pointer usage for keepers in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of each keeper as a pointer type throughout the codebase. rg --type go 'BTCStakingKeeper' rg --type go 'AgentKeeper' rg --type go 'PlanKeeper' rg --type go 'TokenKeeper'Length of output: 23349
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- app/upgrade.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/types.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
Additional comments not posted (4)
app/upgrade.go (1)
35-39: Ensure proper initialization and usage of new keepers.The new keepers
BTCStakingKeeper,AgentKeeper,PlanKeeper, andTokenKeeperare added to theappKeepersfunction. Verify that these keepers are properly initialized and used throughout the application.Verification successful
Ensure proper initialization and usage of new keepers.
The new keepers
BTCStakingKeeper,AgentKeeper,PlanKeeper, andTokenKeeperare properly initialized and used throughout the application as evidenced by the search results.
BTCStakingKeeperis initialized inapp/app.goand used inapp/upgrades/v200/migarations.go.AgentKeeperis initialized inapp/app.goand used inx/plan/keeper/msg_server_test.go.PlanKeeperis initialized inapp/app.goand used inx/plan/keeper/yat_test.go.TokenKeeperis initialized inapp/app.goand used inx/token/keeper/utils_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of new keepers in the codebase. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of each new keeper. Expect: Proper initialization and usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'BTCStakingKeeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'AgentKeeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'PlanKeeper' rg --type go -A 5 $'TokenKeeper'Length of output: 76791
Makefile (3)
225-226: Verify the functionality of the new targetlocalnet-start.The new target
localnet-startstarts services using Docker Compose. Verify that the Docker Compose command is correctly executed and that the services start as expected.
221-224: Verify the functionality of the new targetlocalnet-init.The new target
localnet-initinitializes testnet files using Docker. Verify that the Docker command is correctly executed and that the initialization process works as expected.
218-219: Ensure clarity in target renaming.The target
localnet-build-nodeshas been renamed tolocalnet-build-dev. Verify that the new target name accurately reflects its functionality and is consistent with the rest of theMakefile.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores