Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix set admin for agent module #77

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sheldonleedev
Copy link
Collaborator

@sheldonleedev sheldonleedev commented Jul 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced validation in the admin setting process to return an error if the new admin address is the same as the current one.
    • Added a new suite of unit tests to validate the behavior of the admin setting functionality under various scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for setting admin addresses, ensuring proper feedback in case of invalid operations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the SetAdmin function within the Keeper module of a Cosmos SDK application. The method now prevents setting the same admin address, introducing a new error condition for identical addresses. Additionally, a comprehensive suite of unit tests has been added to validate the function's behavior under various scenarios, ensuring robust error handling and correct admin updates.

Changes

Files Change Summary
x/agent/keeper/agent.go Modified SetAdmin function logic to return an error if the current admin equals the new admin; added documentation for parameters and return value.
x/agent/keeper/agent_test.go Introduced unit tests for SetAdmin, covering scenarios for admin already set, successful admin setting, and a validation function, using a table-driven approach.

Poem

In the burrow deep, where the code does creep,
A change brings joy, no need for a peep.
Admins anew, but never the same,
Errors now catch, each address in game.
With tests so bright, our Keeper's just right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 375912d and 639338d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • x/agent/keeper/agent.go (1 hunks)
  • x/agent/keeper/agent_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/agent/keeper/agent_test.go (4)

17-20: Test case approved: "fail - invalid address, invalid bech32".

The test case correctly verifies that an invalid Bech32 address results in an error.


22-25: Test case approved: "fail - admin already set".

The test case correctly verifies that setting an already set admin results in an error.


27-33: Test case approved: "success - set admin".

The test case correctly verifies that a valid admin address is successfully set and validated.


9-49: Overall test structure approved.

The test structure is well-organized and follows best practices for unit testing.

x/agent/keeper/agent.go (2)

47-54: Documentation comment approved.

The new method documentation comment for SetAdmin is clear and follows the standard format.


57-60: Modified logic approved.

The modified logic within the SetAdmin function correctly prevents setting the same admin address and introduces a new error condition.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 639338d and cb82cdb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/agent/keeper/agent_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • x/agent/keeper/agent_test.go

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 77f9474 into main Jul 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the sheldon/fix-agent branch July 24, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants