Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add v2.0 upgrade handler #68

Closed
wants to merge 40 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

sheldonleedev
Copy link
Collaborator

@sheldonleedev sheldonleedev commented Jul 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an UpgradeRouter for more efficient upgrade handling and configuration.
    • Added new keepers for IBC, Agent, Plan, and BTCStaking modules.
    • Added a new SetAdmin function to manage admin changes in the Agent module.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the upgrade process by restructuring upgrade handling logic.
  • Chores

    • Simplified upgrade store loaders and handlers setup.
    • Added a new error message for admin existence checks.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent changes aim to enhance the upgrade handling logic in the Lorenzo protocol. Key improvements include replacing the plans variable with an UpgradeRouter, introducing new keepers, and simplifying the registration and setup processes for upgrade handlers and store loaders. This restructuring boosts efficiency and modularity in handling upgrades across various modules.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/upgrade.go Restructured the upgrade handling logic, replacing variable plans with UpgradeRouter, and refactoring functions.
app/upgrades/types.go Introduced new imports and keepers, added UpgradeRouter struct, and several methods to handle upgrades.
app/upgrades/v200/migrations.go Added a migration function to transfer data from BTCStaking to Agent module.
app/upgrades/v200/upgrades.go Defined upgrade logic for the Lorenzo protocol, introduced an upgrade struct and handler constructor.
x/agent/keeper/agent.go Added a SetAdmin function to the Keeper struct for setting admin addresses securely.
x/agent/types/errors.go Introduced a new error ErrAdminExists indicating an existing admin.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LorenzoApp
    participant UpgradeRouter
    participant ModuleManager
    participant Configurator
    participant AppKeepers

    User->>+LorenzoApp: Initiate Upgrade Process
    LorenzoApp->>+UpgradeRouter: Register(v200.Upgrade)
    UpgradeRouter-->>LorenzoApp: Upgrade Router Initialized
    LorenzoApp->>+ModuleManager: Setup Upgrade Store Loaders
    LorenzoApp->>+Configurator: Setup Upgrade Handlers
    LorenzoApp->>+AppKeepers: Initialize Module Upgrades
    AppKeepers-->>LorenzoApp: Modules Upgraded
    LorenzoApp-->>User: Upgrade Process Complete
Loading

Poem

In the code of Lorenzo, a change is in sight,
With routers and keepers, we’re reaching new heights.
Upgrades now smoother, a seamless delight,
Modules aligned under stars shining bright.
🐇✨ CodeRabbit hops in pure delight,
For in this new system, all feels just right.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9173e1 and eb15767.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • app/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/types.go (3 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v200/migarations.go (1 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v200/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
  • x/agent/keeper/agent.go (1 hunks)
  • x/agent/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • x/agent/types/errors.go
Additional comments not posted (12)
app/upgrades/v200/migarations.go (2)

23-23: Verify the TODO comment.

Ensure that the Receivers parameter in the btcstaking module is intended to be removed.


9-28: LGTM!

The function is well-structured and handles errors appropriately.

app/upgrade.go (3)

34-51: LGTM!

The function is well-structured and handles errors appropriately.


53-62: LGTM!

The function is well-structured and handles errors appropriately.


12-18: LGTM!

The function is straightforward and correctly delegates tasks to other functions.

app/upgrades/v200/upgrades.go (3)

35-36: Verify the admin address.

Ensure that the admin address is correctly set and not an empty string.


25-59: LGTM!

The function is well-structured and handles errors appropriately.


16-23: LGTM!

The struct is well-defined and follows best practices.

app/upgrades/types.go (4)

42-55: LGTM!

The struct is well-defined and follows best practices.


57-59: LGTM!

The struct is well-defined and follows best practices.


61-63: LGTM!

The function is straightforward and correctly initializes the struct.


65-70: Verify the use of panic.

Ensure that the use of panic for duplicate registration is appropriate in this context.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb15767 and 076654c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/upgrade.go

@sheldonleedev sheldonleedev marked this pull request as draft July 16, 2024 02:50
@sheldonleedev sheldonleedev deleted the sheldon/upgrade-plan-v2.0 branch July 22, 2024 02:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants