feat(btcstaking): add RepairStaking interface #121
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new functionalities for minting and managing a token called StBTC within the staking system. Key updates include the addition of message definitions for minting events and staking repairs, renaming existing methods to better reflect their purposes, and implementing new error handling and event emission logic. The modifications enhance the overall structure and capabilities of the staking module. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MsgServer
participant Keeper
participant BankKeeper
User->>MsgServer: Create RepairStaking Request
MsgServer->>Keeper: Validate Authority and Receiver Info
Keeper->>Keeper: Compensate Receivers
Keeper->>BankKeeper: Mint StBTC
BankKeeper-->>Keeper: Mint Success
Keeper-->>MsgServer: Success Response
MsgServer-->>User: Success
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
x/btcstaking/keeper/mint.go (1)
10-25: Add documentation comments to explain the purpose and behavior of the function.The
MintStBTCfunction is correctly implemented and follows the expected logic for minting and sending tokens. However, it would be helpful to add documentation comments to explain the purpose and behavior of the function.Consider adding documentation comments like this:
// MintStBTC mints the specified amount of stBTC tokens and sends them to the specified account address. // It emits a MintStBTC event on successful minting and sending of tokens. // Returns an error if minting or sending of tokens fails. func (k Keeper) MintStBTC(ctx sdk.Context, toAddr sdk.AccAddress, amount sdkmath.Int) error { // ... }x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go (1)
Line range hint
16-56: LGTM! Reminder: Implement the minting of YAT.The function changes align with the AI-generated summary and improve the clarity and functionality of the code. The changes are approved.
However, the minting of YAT is not implemented yet. Please implement it as indicated by the TODO comment.
Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/btcstaking/types/event.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/btcstaking/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (13)
- proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/event.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go (3 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/btcb_staking.go (2 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/mint.go (1 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (4 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/keeper/repair_staking.go (1 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/types/events.go (2 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/types/msg.go (3 hunks)
- x/btcstaking/types/msg_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (23)
x/btcstaking/keeper/repair_staking.go (1)
9-21: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/btcstaking/types/events.go (1)
4-4: LGTM!The code changes look good:
- The new function
NewEventMintStBTCis correctly implemented and follows the standard Go conventions.- The use of
sdkmath.Intfor theAmountfield enhances precision and consistency in handling integer values.- The function name and parameter names are descriptive and convey the purpose of the function.
- The function is small and focused, adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle.
- The import statement for
sdkmathhas been added to facilitate the use ofsdkmath.Int.The AI-generated summary provides a good overview of the changes and their implications.
Also applies to: 29-35
proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/event.proto (1)
25-32: LGTM!The new message definition
EventMintStBTCis well-structured and follows the Protocol Buffer syntax. The field names are descriptive, and the use of the custom type from the Cosmos SDK for theamountfield ensures compatibility. Marking theamountfield as non-nullable is a good practice to prevent ambiguity and ensure data integrity.The code changes are approved.
x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go (1)
Line range hint
58-75: LGTM!The function changes align with the AI-generated summary and improve the clarity of the code. The changes are approved.
x/btcstaking/types/errors.go (1)
31-31: LGTM!The new error variable
ErrMintStBTCis declared correctly with a unique error code and a descriptive message. It enhances the error handling capabilities of the module by providing a specific error case related to the minting process.x/btcstaking/keeper/btcb_staking.go (1)
95-99: LGTM!The code changes streamline the minting process and improve error handling. The changes are in line with the AI-generated summary and there are no apparent issues or inconsistencies.
proto/lorenzo/btcstaking/v1/tx.proto (4)
29-30: LGTM!The
RepairStakingRPC method definition in theMsgservice looks good.
127-133: LGTM!The
MsgRepairStakingmessage definition looks good.
135-135: LGTM!The
MsgRepairStakingResponsemessage definition looks good.
137-143: LGTM!The
ReceiverInfomessage definition looks good.x/btcstaking/types/msg_test.go (1)
224-293: LGTM!The new test function
TestMsgRepairStakingis well-structured and enhances the test coverage for theMsgRepairStakingfunctionality. It covers various scenarios to validate the message structure, including:
- Invalid authority addresses
- Zero amounts
- Valid message
The use of
suite.Runmethod to encapsulate each test case allows for organized reporting of results.The code changes are approved.
x/btcstaking/types/msg.go (3)
23-23: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
34-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
253-287: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
MsgRepairStakingmessage type and its associated methods are correctly implemented, following the SDK message implementation guidelines. The validation checks in theValidateBasicmethod ensure that addresses are valid and that amounts are not zero.x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
149-151: Verify the usage of theDepositBTCmethod in the codebase.Ensure that the
DepositBTCmethod is correctly handling the additional arguments and that the change does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
DepositBTCmethod:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
DepositBTCMethod Usage is CorrectThe
DepositBTCmethod is used consistently with the correct number of arguments across the codebase, and its functionality is being tested. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `DepositBTC` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences with the correct number of arguments. rg --type go -A 5 $'DepositBTC'Length of output: 2451
175-175: Verify the usage of theWithdrawmethod in the codebase.Ensure that the
Withdrawmethod is correctly handling the burn process and that the change does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Withdrawmethod:Verification successful
The
Withdrawmethod is correctly implemented and used in thebtcstakingmodule.The method checks for sufficient balance before proceeding, ensuring proper validation. The change from
UndelegatetoWithdrawdoes not introduce any unintended side effects. The usage inmsg_server.gomatches the method's signature. No further issues were found.
x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking.go: Implementation ofWithdraw.x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server.go: Usage ofWithdraw.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Withdraw` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences with the correct number of arguments. rg --type go -A 5 $'Withdraw'Length of output: 3255
216-229: Verify the usage of theCompensatemethod and ensure proper authorization.
- Verify the usage of the
Compensatemethod in the codebase to ensure that it is correctly handling the compensation process and that the change does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Compensatemethod:
- Ensure that the authority check is sufficient to prevent unauthorized access to the
RepairStakingmethod.Run the following script to verify the authority check:
x/btcstaking/keeper/btc_staking_test.go (5)
408-408: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
408-408: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
408-408: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
408-408: Verify the reason for commenting out the YAT balance and BTC staking record checks.The test case verifies the successful behavior of the
DepositBTCfunction. However, the code that checks the YAT balance and BTC staking record is commented out.Please clarify the reason for commenting out these checks. Are they no longer relevant or needed?
408-408: Verify the reason for commenting out the YAT balance and BTC staking record checks.The test case verifies the successful behavior of the
DepositBTCfunction when the mint address is different from the receiver address. However, the code that checks the YAT balance and BTC staking record is commented out.Please clarify the reason for commenting out these checks. Are they no longer relevant or needed?
x/btcstaking/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
369-436: LGTM!The
TestRepairStakingfunction is a well-structured test that covers the important scenarios for theRepairStakingmethod. It includes test cases for invalid authority and a valid repair request, with proper validation of balances and events.The test function is approved.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
EventMintStBTCfor minting event tracking.RepairStakingmethod for managing staking repairs.MintStBTCfunction for streamlined token minting and transfer.Compensatefunction for compensating multiple receivers.MsgRepairStakingmessage type for staking repair requests.Bug Fixes
Tests
RepairStakingandMsgRepairStakingfunctionalities.