Skip to content

Introducing LowLevelSerialization #48

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

Introducing LowLevelSerialization #48

merged 12 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

ftomassetti
Copy link
Contributor

With this PR we introduce the LowLevelSerialization. It is intended to load semantically invalid/incoherent chunks and it is an intermediate rappresentation between the "proper" models and metamodels and the JSON representation.

This PR includes an update of all examples.

Some tests are still failing and they will be corrected as part of the remaining PR to finish up #46

@ftomassetti ftomassetti requested review from dslmeinte and enikao March 21, 2023 11:48
@ftomassetti
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am adding both @enikao and @dslmeinte as reviewers: I think one review would be sufficient so I think once we got one in it is not strictly needed to have also the other one

@dslmeinte
Copy link
Contributor

Big PR! It looks good. The tests (in this repo) seem to be failing currently, though.

@ftomassetti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, it is a big PR, but I obtained by splitting the original PR in three parts :D This was the second one of the three and third one is coming next. The tests are failing because I need to open a separate PR for the changes in the high-level serialization class. With the next PR all tests should be passing

@ftomassetti ftomassetti merged commit 8381f40 into master Mar 21, 2023
@ftomassetti ftomassetti deleted the issue46-lowlevelser branch April 28, 2023 06:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants