Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

admin sample design + samples json #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

tkrch
Copy link
Collaborator

@tkrch tkrch commented Sep 5, 2023

No description provided.

*/

// Defines a new application and registers its root page under <webappdomain>/admin/CustomTemplate
[assembly: UIApplication("UMT.index", typeof(UniversalMigrationTemplate), "universal-migration-toolkit", "Universal migration toolkit", UmtWebAdminModule.CustomCategory, Icons.Clock, "@umt/web-admin/CustomLayout")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like to talk with the dev team about conventions for naming modules that come from Kentico.

Ex:

  • @umt/web-admin/...
  • @kentico/umt-web-admin/...
  • @kentico-umt/web-admin/...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here's the feedback from Jakub O.

  • anything officially supported by Kentico and part of the product portfolio should use the Kentico prefix.
  • integration packages should avoid using general naming as much as possible.

❌Bad
@Kentico/Search
Kentico.Xperience.Search
@kentico/web-admin

✔ Good
@Kentico/Lucene-Search
Kentico.Xperience.LuceneSearch
@kentico/umt-web-admin

I think this means we should name the client package @kentico/umt-web-admin

@tkrch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tkrch commented Jan 25, 2024

work on this PR was halted until further work is approved

@tkrch tkrch closed this Jan 29, 2024
@tkrch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tkrch commented Jan 29, 2024

closing, this PR is obsolete due to changes in XbyK APIs and change in plans how will admin sample be implemented

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants