Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: DiffEqCallbacks v2.9.0 #4853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2019

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 459566f4-90b8-5000-8ac3-15dfb0a30def
Repo: https://github.com/JuliaDiffEq/DiffEqCallbacks.jl.git
Tree: 0cb6b3481df064100cf6a2f3c457e7e024edb9e9

Registrator tree SHA: f50e50c1d2a1b9694b1d5749fdb25fef2ca4c291
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 29, 2019

Your new version pull request does not meet all of the guidelines for automatic merging.

Specifically, your pull request does not meet the following guidelines:

  • The following dependencies do not have a compat entry that has an upper bound: DataStructures, DiffEqBase, ForwardDiff, NLsolve, RecipesBase, StaticArrays

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment.

(If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.)


It is important to note that if your pull request does not meet the guidelines for automatic merging, this does not mean that your pull request will never be merged. It just means that your pull request will require manual review by a human.

These guidelines are intended not as requirements for packages but as very conservative guidelines, which, if your new package or new version of a package meets them, it may be automatically merged.


[noblock]

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit fc064d6 into master Oct 29, 2019
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the registrator/diffeqcallbacks/459566f4/v2.9.0 branch October 29, 2019 15:42
@julia-tagbot
Copy link

julia-tagbot bot commented Oct 29, 2019

I've created release v2.9.0, here it is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants