-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use atomics for the StickyWorkqueue array instead of a lock #55514
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
base/task.jl
Outdated
while length(qs) < tid | ||
nt = Threads.maxthreadid() | ||
@assert tid <= nt | ||
new_qs = copyto!(typeof(qs)(undef, length(qs) + nt - 1), qs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this length(as) + nt - 1
I see that this is the old code as well. Are we implementing doubling? Maybe worth a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a data race if you don't have a lock around the whole thing to make it valid
base/task.jl
Outdated
end | ||
if !isassigned(qs, tid) | ||
@inbounds qs[tid] = StickyWorkqueue() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This also needs atomics now that it is no longer behind a lock
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that I think about it. This is probably unsafe, we need to eagerly allocate the queues now, because there's no way to make sure that qs is still the same as workqueues here.
The change to Memory is probably still a net positive |
The title of the PR is now very inaccurate though |
I was implementing a way to change the number of workqueues in a lock-free way for use with my workstealing development and ported it to the one we already have in julia