-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inference: model partially initialized structs with PartialStruct
#55297
Merged
+393
−126
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This appears to impose additional semantics on
PartialStruct
that are not clear to me are satisfied with the existing lattice elements. I'm thinking of cases like:It's not clear to me that the tmerge will respect the semantics you're imposing here. Perhaps it would be cleaner to give
PartialStruct
a newninitialized
field?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The information equivalent to
ninitialized
can be derived from the length offields
, and whenPartialStruct
s with different lengths offields
are joined, the joinedPartialStruct
s are simply widened to the simple object type, so I don't see any problem?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that loses some precision, but I guess that's fine. That said, this needs a comment somewhere to describe the semantics of a PartialStruct with short
fields
. We should also audit all uses offields
and probably pkgeval this. Lastly, I'm not sure this logic is correct, because it doesn't look like it's actually looking at the length offields
, but I don't have the time to check right now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does c57d34c seem to address this?
Yeah, I did audit all uses, but it would be a good idea to exercise with pkgeval.
@nanosoldier
runtests()
Specifically regarding this logic, the length of
fields
is later referenced withinisdefined_tfunc
.fieldcount_noerror
is used for iteration when applyingisdefined_tfunc
to all fields that might be uninitialized. However, that code path is hit only when bounds checking turned off and the field is not constant, making it quite niche.