Skip to content

Workaround possible GC dead loop #15677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2016
Merged

Workaround possible GC dead loop #15677

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2016

Conversation

yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor

This is necessary before the gc safepoint/transition support in codegen.

@yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpamnany This could cause #15620 if you were using any of these functions or similar code.

@kpamnany
Copy link
Contributor

Will check. Thanks!

This is necessary before the gc safepoint/transition support in codegen.
@yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor Author

I take this chance to start teaching the codegen how to generate the safepoint inline and also cleaning up the custom symbol table for threading a little bit so hopefully it'll be less likely to be broken. @vtjnash

@yuyichao yuyichao merged commit 7b51368 into master Mar 31, 2016
@yuyichao yuyichao deleted the yyc/threads/fix branch March 31, 2016 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants