Move whitebox testing to a profile #146
Conversation
* Use release instead of source/target in pom.xml * Split install and site in CI
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files to enhance the build and cleanup processes of the project. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub
participant BuildSystem
participant Maven
User->>GitHub: Push changes
GitHub->>BuildSystem: Trigger build workflow
BuildSystem->>Maven: Execute build with extended tests
Maven->>Maven: Generate site documentation
BuildSystem->>GitHub: Cleanup branches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/website.sh (1)
24-27: Approve changes with a minor suggestionThe addition of the cleanup commands is a good practice for maintaining a tidy repository. The use of
|| trueensures the script doesn't fail if the branches don't exist, which is sensible.A minor suggestion to improve clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these cleanup commands. For example:
echo "## tidy..." cd .. +# Remove temporary branches used during the website update process git push --delete origin website || true git push --delete origin website2x || trueThis comment would help future maintainers understand why these specific branches are being deleted.
pom.xml (3)
5-5: Significant update to Java version requirementThe project has been updated to require Java SE 21 or later for building, and the description now indicates compatibility with Java 21 and above. This is a substantial change that may impact users who are still on earlier Java versions.
Consider the following:
- Ensure that all dependencies and libraries used in the project are compatible with Java 21.
- Update the project documentation to clearly communicate this change to users.
- Consider providing migration guidelines for users who need to upgrade their Java version.
Also applies to: 14-14
602-731: Approval: Comprehensive 'extended-test' profile addedThe new 'extended-test' profile is a well-thought-out addition that enhances the project's testing capabilities. Key benefits include:
- Thorough testing across different module and classpath configurations.
- Compatibility with both IDE and Maven-based testing.
- Clever workaround for IDE issues with 'requires static' by dynamically managing module-info.java.
This approach ensures that the codebase is tested under various conditions, increasing confidence in its compatibility and correctness.
Considerations:
- Ensure that the profile is well-documented in the project's contribution guidelines.
- Monitor the build time impact of the additional test executions.
- Regularly review if this approach is still necessary as IDEs improve their module system support.
785-785: Approval: Profile renaming for clarityThe renaming of the profile from 'release-basics' to 'release-artifacts' is a positive change. The new name appears to more accurately reflect the purpose of the profile, which likely deals with the creation and management of release artifacts.
To ensure consistency:
- Update any project documentation that references this profile.
- Review and update any CI/CD scripts or workflows that might be using this profile name.
- Consider adding a comment in the POM file explaining the purpose of this profile for future maintainers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/website.sh (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
- pom.xml (7 hunks)
- src/site/site.xml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/build.yml (4)
56-58: Approve addition of separate Maven site stepThe introduction of a separate 'Maven site' step is a positive change. It improves the clarity of the workflow and allows for more granular control over the site generation process.
To ensure this change doesn't significantly impact the workflow duration, please monitor the execution times of your workflows. You might want to run the following script to check if the site generation is particularly time-consuming:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for time-consuming tasks in the site generation # Test: Look for plugins that might be slow in the site generation echo "Checking for potentially slow plugins in site generation:" rg --type xml '<reportSet>|<report>' pom.xml -A 5
51-51: Approve changes to Maven build command and verify extended testsThe modification to use '-Dextended-test' instead of the 'site' goal is a good separation of concerns. This change allows for more comprehensive testing during the build process.
To ensure the extended tests are properly configured and executed, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the configuration and impact of extended tests # Test 1: Check for the definition of extended tests in pom.xml echo "Checking for extended test profile in pom.xml:" rg --type xml '<profile>.*<id>extended-test</id>' pom.xml -A 10 # Test 2: Search for usage of the 'extended-test' property in test files echo "Searching for usage of 'extended-test' property in test files:" rg --type java '@Test.*extended-test' src/test
Line range hint
63-63: Verify the necessity of using a personal access token for website deploymentThe use of a personal access token (PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH) for the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable in the website deployment step is consistent with its usage in the checkout step. However, this approach may have security implications.
Please confirm:
- Why is the personal access token required for website deployment?
- Are there any operations in the website deployment that cannot be performed with the default GITHUB_TOKEN?
- Have you considered using GitHub Actions environments with protection rules for managing access to this secret?
To verify the token's usage in the website deployment script, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of GITHUB_TOKEN in the website deployment script # Test: Examine the website deployment script for GitHub API calls or operations requiring elevated permissions echo "Checking .github/website.sh for GitHub API usage:" rg --type bash 'api.github.com|GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/website.sh🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 25-25: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
27-28: Verify the necessity of using a personal access tokenThe addition of a personal access token to the checkout step provides extended permissions. Whilst this may be necessary for certain operations, it could potentially pose security risks if not managed properly.
Please confirm:
- Why is the personal access token required for the checkout step?
- Are the permissions granted to this token limited to only what's necessary?
- Is the secret 'PERSONAL_TOKEN_GH' properly secured and regularly rotated?
To verify the token's usage, you can run the following script:
src/site/site.xml (1)
85-85: Please verify the updated test results linkThe href attribute for the "Test results" menu item has been updated from "surefire-report.html" to "surefire.html". This change appears to be in line with potential updates to the Maven site generation process.
Could you please:
- Confirm that the new link (surefire.html) is correct and functional in the generated site?
- Check if there are any other occurrences of "surefire-report.html" in the project that might need updating for consistency?
You can use the following script to search for other occurrences:
pom.xml (4)
103-134: Approval: Enhanced build cleanup processThe addition of the 'clean-mess' execution for the maven-clean-plugin is a positive change. It helps maintain a clean build environment by removing specific files that could potentially interfere with the build process. This practice contributes to more consistent and reliable builds across different environments.
Key benefits:
- Removes potential build artifacts that could cause inconsistencies.
- Ensures a clean state before each build, reducing the risk of build failures due to leftover files.
- Improves build reproducibility across different machines and environments.
888-888: Approval: Updated OSGI capability requirementThe change from
${maven.compiler.source}to${maven.compiler.release}in thejoda.osgi.require.capabilityproperty is a positive update. This aligns with the modern best practice for specifying Java versions in Maven builds, especially for Java 9+ projects.Benefits of this change:
- Provides better control over both the source and target versions of Java.
- Ensures consistency between the compilation and runtime environments.
- Aligns with the recommended approach for Java 9+ projects.
927-927: Approval: Updated Java compiler release versionSetting
maven.compiler.releaseto 21 is consistent with the project's updated Java version requirement. This change:
- Ensures that the project is compiled and runs with Java 21 features and APIs.
- Provides better control over both the source and target versions of Java.
- Aligns with the recommended approach for specifying Java versions in Maven for Java 9+ projects.
This setting, combined with the earlier updates, reinforces the project's commitment to using Java 21 as the baseline version.
901-901: Approval: Plugin version updates with a noteThe updates to plugin versions are generally beneficial:
- maven-gpg-plugin: 3.2.7
- maven-javadoc-plugin: 3.10.1
- maven-project-info-reports-plugin: 3.6.2
These updates likely include bug fixes, security improvements, and potentially new features.
However, there's a note about an error in version 3.7.0 of maven-project-info-reports-plugin. It would be beneficial to:
- Document the specific error encountered with version 3.7.0.
- Create a reminder to check for a fix in future versions of this plugin.
- Consider contributing the error details to the plugin's issue tracker if it hasn't been reported.
To verify if the issue with maven-project-info-reports-plugin 3.7.0 has been reported or fixed, you can run:
Also applies to: 904-904, 908-908
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores