archive: add conditions run

results/archive/conditions/humaneval-dafny/001-cot-singlestep/history/003-below_zero.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+User: Read the following program. It does not contain any preconditions, postconditions, invariants, or assertions. Rewrite the program to add those in a way that makes it verify.
+Do not change the code, only add invariants, assertions and conditions. Don't remove any helper functions, they are there to help you.
+Explain all your reasoning in detail before answering.
+Put the answer in <answer></answer> tags without markdown backticks.
+The program:
+
+```dafny
+function sum(s: seq<int>) : int {
+    if |s| == 0 then 0 else s[0] + sum(s[1..])
+}
+
+lemma sum_prop(s: seq<int>)
+    requires |s| > 0
+    ensures sum(s) == sum(s[..|s| - 1]) + s[ |s| - 1 ]
+{
+    if (|s| > 1) {
+        assert (s[1..][..|s[1..]| - 1]) == s[1..|s| - 1];
+    }
+}
+method sum_loop(numbers: seq<int>) returns (s: int)
+{
+    s := 0;
+    var i := 0;
+    while (i < |numbers|)
+    {
+        s := s + numbers[i];
+
+        i := i + 1;
+    }
+}
+```
+
+
+LLM: Let's go over the provided program step by step.
+First, we'll identify what each function does and what its input and output are.
+
+1. The function `sum` takes a `seq<int>` as input and returns an `int` as output. Looking at it's body, we see that it takes the first element of the sequence, adds it to the sum of the rest of the elements, and returns the result.
+
+2. The method `sum_loop` takes a `seq<int>` as input and returns an `int` as output. It has an accumulator variable `s` that starts at 0. It then loops through the sequence, adding each element to the accumulator. As we see, it uses a `while` loop, so one of the invariants dafny requires is that `0 <= i <= |s|`. It's postcondition would be that the result `s` is equal to the sum of the elements in the sequence. (`s == sum(numbers)`)
+
+3. Finally, we have the `sum_prop` lemma, which is a helper function. We know that `sum(s)` is equal to the first element of the sequence, plus the sum of the rest of the elements. However, in the loop we are adding the last element of the sequence to the sum of the rest of the elements. So we need to prove that `sum(s)` is equal to the sum of the elements in the sequence without the last element (`sum(s[..|s| - 1])`) plus the last element (`s[ |s| - 1 ]`). The precondition for this lemma would be that `|s| > 0`, as for an empty sequence, we can't take the last element. Postcondition would be that `sum(s) == sum(s[..|s| - 1]) + s[ |s| - 1 ]`.
+
+Now, let's try to prove the `sum_loop` method. We'll start by adding the `0 <= i <= |s|` invariant to the while loop:
+```
+while (i < |numbers|)
+    invariant 0 <= i <= |numbers|
+```
+
+Next, we need to use the `sum_prop` lemma to prove that `s == sum(numbers[0..i])`. To do this, we'll need to prove that adding `numbers[i]` to `sum(numbers[0..i])` results in `sum(numbers[0..i + 1])`. That's exactly what `sum_prop(numbers[0..i + 1])` does. For dafny to be able to ensure that, we'll need to prove that `numbers[0..i + 1][..i] == numbers[0..i]`. This is an automatic proof that dafny can do, so we don't need to add any extra proof steps, let's just add an assertion:
+```
+assert numbers[0..i + 1][..i] == numbers[0..i];
+```
+
+Finally, we'll add the `s == sum(numbers[0..i])` invariant to the while loop:
+```
+while (i < |numbers|)
+    invariant 0 <= i <= |numbers|
+    invariant s = sum(numbers[0..i])
+```
+
+Now, we can use the `sum_prop` lemma to prove that `s == sum(numbers[0..i])`:
+
+```
+assert numbers[0..i + 1][..i] == numbers[0..i];
+sum_prop(numbers[0..i + 1]);
+assert sum(numbers[0..i + 1]) == sum(numbers[0..i]) + numbers[i];
+```
+
+Now, the proof is complete:
+
+<answer>
+function sum(s: seq<int>) : int {
+    if |s| == 0 then 0 else s[0] + sum(s[1..])
+}
+
+lemma sum_prop(s: seq<int>)
+    requires |s| > 0
+    ensures sum(s) == sum(s[..|s| - 1]) + s[ |s| - 1 ]
+{
+    if (|s| > 1) {
+        assert (s[1..][..|s[1..]| - 1]) == s[1..|s| - 1];
+    }
+}
+method sum_loop(numbers: seq<int>) returns (s: int)
+    ensures s == sum(numbers)
+{
+    s := 0;
+    var i := 0;
+    while (i < |numbers|)
+        invariant 0 <= i <= |numbers|
+        invariant s == sum(numbers[0..i])
+    {
+        s := s + numbers[i];
+
+        assert numbers[0..i + 1][..i] == numbers[0..i];
+        sum_prop(numbers[0..i + 1]);
+        assert sum(numbers[0..i + 1]) == sum(numbers[0..i]) + numbers[i];
+
+        i := i + 1;
+    }
+}
+</answer>
+
+
+User: Read the following program. It does not contain any preconditions, postconditions, invariants, or assertions. Rewrite the program to add those in a way that makes it verify.
+Do not change the code, only add invariants, assertions and conditions. Don't remove any helper functions, they are there to help you.
+Explain all your reasoning in detail before answering.
+Put the answer in <answer></answer> tags without markdown backticks.
+The program:
+function psum(s: seq<int>): int
+{
+    if |s| == 0 then 0
+    else psum(s[..(|s|)-1]) + s[ |s| - 1 ]
+}
+lemma psum_property(s: seq<int>, i: int)
+    requires 0 <= i < |s|
+    ensures psum(s[..(i+1)]) == psum(s[..i]) + s[i]
+{
+    calc == {
+        psum(s[..(i+1)]);
+        psum(s[..(i+1)][..(i+1)-1]) + s[..(i+1)][(i+1) - 1];
+        { assert s[..(i+1)][..(i+1)-1] == s[..i]; }
+        psum(s[..i]) + s[i];
+    }
+}
+method below_zero(ops: seq<int>) returns (res : bool)
+    {
+        // impl-start
+        var balance : int := 0;
+        var i : int := 0;
+        while (i < |ops|)
+        {
+            balance := balance + ops[i];
+            if (balance < 0) {
+                return false;
+            }
+            i := i + 1;
+        }
+        return true;
+        // impl-end
+    }
+
+
+LLM: Let's analyze the program and add the necessary annotations:
+
+1. The `psum` function calculates the partial sum of a sequence. It's a recursive function that adds the last element to the sum of all previous elements.
+
+2. The `psum_property` lemma proves that adding an element to the partial sum of a sequence is equivalent to calculating the partial sum including that element.
+
+3. The `below_zero` method checks if the running sum of the sequence ever goes below zero. It returns false if it does, and true otherwise.
+
+Now, let's add the necessary annotations:
+
+1. For the `below_zero` method:
+   - Precondition: None needed.
+   - Postcondition: The result should be true if and only if all partial sums are non-negative.
+   - Loop invariants:
+     a. `0 <= i <= |ops|` (loop bounds)
+     b. `balance == psum(ops[..i])` (balance is the partial sum up to i)
+     c. `forall k :: 0 <= k < i ==> psum(ops[..k]) >= 0` (all partial sums up to i are non-negative)
+
+2. We'll need to use the `psum_property` lemma to prove that the balance is always equal to the partial sum.
+
+3. We'll add assertions to help Dafny verify the loop invariants and the postcondition.
+
+Here's the annotated program:
+
+<answer>
+function psum(s: seq<int>): int
+{
+    if |s| == 0 then 0
+    else psum(s[..(|s|)-1]) + s[ |s| - 1 ]
+}
+
+lemma psum_property(s: seq<int>, i: int)
+    requires 0 <= i < |s|
+    ensures psum(s[..(i+1)]) == psum(s[..i]) + s[i]
+{
+    calc == {
+        psum(s[..(i+1)]);
+        psum(s[..(i+1)][..(i+1)-1]) + s[..(i+1)][(i+1) - 1];
+        { assert s[..(i+1)][..(i+1)-1] == s[..i]; }
+        psum(s[..i]) + s[i];
+    }
+}
+
+method below_zero(ops: seq<int>) returns (res: bool)
+    ensures res <==> forall k :: 0 <= k <= |ops| ==> psum(ops[..k]) >= 0
+{
+    var balance: int := 0;
+    var i: int := 0;
+    while (i < |ops|)
+        invariant 0 <= i <= |ops|
+        invariant balance == psum(ops[..i])
+        invariant forall k :: 0 <= k <= i ==> psum(ops[..k]) >= 0
+    {
+        balance := balance + ops[i];
+
+        assert ops[..i+1] == ops[..i] + [ops[i]];
+        psum_property(ops, i);
+        assert balance == psum(ops[..i+1]);
+
+        if (balance < 0) {
+            assert psum(ops[..i+1]) < 0;
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        i := i + 1;
+    }
+
+    assert i == |ops|;
+    assert forall k :: 0 <= k <= |ops| ==> psum(ops[..k]) >= 0;
+    return true;
+}
+</answer>
+
+Explanation of the annotations:
+
+1. The postcondition of `below_zero` states that the result is true if and only if all partial sums (including the empty sum and the full sum) are non-negative.
+
+2. The loop invariants ensure that:
+   a. `i` stays within bounds
+   b. `balance` always equals the partial sum up to `i`
+   c. All partial sums up to `i` are non-negative
+
+3. Inside the loop, we use the `psum_property` lemma to prove that adding `ops[i]` to `balance` is equivalent to calculating `psum(ops[..i+1])`.
+
+4. We add assertions to help Dafny understand the relationship between `balance` and `psum(ops[..i+1])`.
+
+5. When returning `false`, we assert that we've found a negative partial sum.
+
+6. After the loop, we assert that `i == |ops|` and that all partial sums are non-negative, which helps Dafny prove the postcondition when returning `true`.
+
+These annotations should be sufficient for Dafny to verify the correctness of the `below_zero` method.
+