-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable awscli-v2 in ewok-env/jedi-tools-env, update gmao-swell-env (includes PR https://github.com/JCSDA/spack/pull/332) #338
Conversation
…into feature/enable_awscli_v2_update_swell
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any issues, but I am also not familiar with the requirements for the gmao-swell-env. I tested previously for awscli-v2 on my mac with no issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for my learning: the BundlePackage is a spack mechanism for specifying a set of dependencies, requirements, variant's, conflicts, etc. (but no actual build) that are needed for another package/system defined/installed somewhere else. So in this case SWELL is a development system that is not managed by spack, but requires a certain set of packages/versions/etc that are being managed by spack. Am I understanding this correctly? Thanks!
These virtual envs are convenient for us to define dependencies and to create modules that load whatever is needed for a specific application. |
e2e7137
to
642ff95
Compare
… missing build dependencies cmake (for all), openssl (for linux)
642ff95
to
9b7c34e
Compare
Description
py-awscrt
, adding missing dependencies oncmake
(all platforms) andopenssl
(Linux)awscli
withawscli-v2
inewok-env
andjedi-tools-env
gmao-swell-env
: simplify dependency treesThis PR includes #332 (cherry-picked), i.e. when it gets closed it will automatically close #332 as completed, too.
Testing
See JCSDA/spack-stack#813
Note that the "CI failure" below is a codecov error with minimal changes that we should ignore.
Issues
See JCSDA/spack-stack#813