-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternate Bcat Taxonomy proposal #107
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hey Patrick, the bcat category can actually be modified by the cattax value in open rtb 2.6: https://iabtechlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/OpenRTB-2-6_FINAL.pdf |
That doesn't solve the problem; if we put an updated bcat taxonomy in that field no one would currently understand our bcats, as everyone has built tooling on iab tax 1. It seems we are stuck on tax 1 forever without this proposal or a similar solution. |
Couple questions: "The taxonomy migration problem has already been solved in publisher content categorization, with publishers or exchanges able to specify content categories on multiple simultaneous taxonomies." -- I do not believe this to be the case in the mainline OpenRTB spec, can you advise? I'm having a bit of trouble getting my head around this replace/append concept and the reference to "any stored list associated with that requestor". Can you elaborate on what's intended with this? |
This is true in https://github.com/InteractiveAdvertisingBureau/openrtb/blob/master/extensions/community_extensions/segtax.md which is incorporated in https://iabtechlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/IAB-Tech-Lab-Taxonomy-and-Data-Transparency-Standards-to-Support-Seller-defined-Audience-and-Context-Signaling.pdf and referenced for content taxonomy on pages 13 and 14
This is entirely severable. However, this is the basic idea, using badv as an example: If a publisher tells an ssp badv = ['prebid.org'] they may wish to also say 'append that to the list I already gave you for my account' or 'replace the list, this is the only badv'. We're finding a similar concept is useful in bcats. |
Attempts to solve the popularity of the legacy, deprecated content taxonomy 1.0 in the bcat field.