Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension of the Fawe documentation to achieve a better understanding of regions and patterns #65

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TheMeinerLP
Copy link
Member

Overview

Description

The pull request is dedicated to new developers who plan to edit regions with different patterns and execute code from Fawe async. This PR also covers the Biome pattern and the Cubiod region. It also deals with the FAWE TaskManager and the Spigot scheduler

Submitter Checklist

@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2024 08:50
@NotMyFault
Copy link
Member

The PR conflicts, please rebase with the main branch.

@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP force-pushed the feature/advance-fawe-developer-examples branch from 6a4cd97 to ab9333f Compare February 9, 2024 09:27
@TheMeinerLP
Copy link
Member Author

Conflicts resolved

@NotMyFault
Copy link
Member

I'd like to request an explicit review of @SirYwell and @dordsor21, given you have a more profound understanding of me about this topic.

fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@OneLiteFeather OneLiteFeather added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation FastAsyncWorldEdit labels Feb 9, 2024
@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP force-pushed the feature/advance-fawe-developer-examples branch from ae0e4a8 to a9b19eb Compare February 9, 2024 12:08
@NotMyFault
Copy link
Member

If someone from @IntellectualSites/fastasyncworldedit-team want to take another look :)

fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP force-pushed the feature/advance-fawe-developer-examples branch from 6774509 to f28aea7 Compare April 7, 2024 12:32
@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP requested review from a team as code owners April 7, 2024 12:32
@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP force-pushed the feature/advance-fawe-developer-examples branch from f28aea7 to f61a059 Compare April 7, 2024 12:33
This example describe so far it possible the edit process and the async process to edit a region with a specific biome.
@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP force-pushed the feature/advance-fawe-developer-examples branch from f61a059 to c2c2c67 Compare April 7, 2024 12:37
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fastasyncworldedit/API/fill-region-by-pattern.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation FastAsyncWorldEdit
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants