-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: kernels for random.vonmisses
; part 2
#681
Draft
samir-nasibli
wants to merge
17
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
63eeab1
ENH: kernels for random.vonmisses
samir-nasibli 5e6086c
update
samir-nasibli 4268517
refactoring
samir-nasibli 6f77dc0
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli b5f539a
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli e9c17c7
disabled tests on CPU
samir-nasibli 75dc985
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli 7221851
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli df3160f
tmp solution
samir-nasibli 0e743d2
revert last changes on dpnp_krnl_random.cpp
samir-nasibli ff8de8e
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli 1492555
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli 233cd59
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
samir-nasibli 30637c6
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
shssf 3222bc5
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
Alexander-Makaryev 2c3eeb2
Merge branch 'master' into samir-nasibli/enh/vonmisses_random
densmirn b2b3c42
Plukiche/vonmisses random (#998)
LukichevaPolina File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kernel inside the loop with bigger trip count. It would be more efficient to parallelize (make kernel) the algorithm by bigger value
size
insteadsize-n
. So, it will require a loop inside the kernel.It is questionable what will be more performant
It is hard to predict it with no perf measurements but I would vote that parallelization with bigger number of threads should be better.