♻️ rerouted update projects networks via dynamic-scheduler

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

Rerouted update project networks command via dynamic-scheduler.

Related issue/s

• dynamic scheduler: extract scheduling logic and move it away from director-v2 #5632
• requirement: reroute director-v2 service calls via dynamic-scheduler from webserver #6894
• closes redirect update_projects_networks call via dynamic-scheduler #6947

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.29412% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.14%. Comparing base (95d208b) to head (8b7d4c9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6945      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.11%   88.14%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1592     1585       -7     
  Lines       62337    62164     -173     
  Branches     2012     2013       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        54928    54796     -132     
+ Misses       7074     7032      -42     
- Partials      335      336       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.00% <33.33%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittests	86.35% <85.29%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	93.49% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.24% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.05% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	74.52% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	90.60% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	97.00% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.13% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.48% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.40% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.38% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.03% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.58% <ø> (+0.26%)	⬆️
storage	89.54% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.74% <93.33%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 95d208b...8b7d4c9. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

Same question as in the other Prs #6943 (review)

[pcrespov]

thx for the explanation.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud