Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: get GMC by id #1040

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

feat: get GMC by id #1040

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

ReubenRobertsHEE
Copy link
Contributor

@ReubenRobertsHEE ReubenRobertsHEE commented Jan 10, 2025

Since findGmcDetailsIn() actually uses GMC numbers to search by, not ids. tis-sync PR to use this new client function to follow.

TIS21-6639

Since findGmcDetailsIn() actually uses GMC numbers to search by, not
ids.

TIS21-6639
@@ -698,6 +698,12 @@ public List<GmcDetailsDTO> findGmcDetailsIn(List<String> gmcIds) {
return responseEntity.getBody();
}

public GmcDetailsDTO getGmcDetailsById(Long id) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't include a javadoc because there aren't any in this file. I can amend if needed, but then perhaps we need to write javadocs for all the client functions?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add the a javadoc please.

@ReubenRobertsHEE ReubenRobertsHEE marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 17:09
ReubenRobertsHEE added a commit to Health-Education-England/TIS-SYNC that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ReubenRobertsHEE ReubenRobertsHEE merged commit dcbbd6e into main Jan 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@ReubenRobertsHEE ReubenRobertsHEE deleted the feat/getGmcById branch January 13, 2025 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants