Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cover DateTimeOffset deserialization #1721

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

danielcweber
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.84%. Comparing base (99123fa) to head (f671fdd).
Report is 7 commits behind head on 12.x.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...son/Converters/ScalarToPropertyConverterFactory.cs 90.90% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             12.x    #1721      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.70%   82.84%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         254      253       -1     
  Lines        6818     6802      -16     
  Branches     1486     1482       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         5639     5635       -4     
+ Misses        532      527       -5     
+ Partials      647      640       -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@danielcweber danielcweber force-pushed the CoverDateTimeOffsetDeserialization branch from a3eb605 to f671fdd Compare September 6, 2024 13:32
@danielcweber danielcweber merged commit f671fdd into 12.x Sep 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@danielcweber danielcweber deleted the CoverDateTimeOffsetDeserialization branch September 6, 2024 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant