Skip to content

Update SearchWithBoostSpec.java #10096

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rebeccaellis
Copy link

Added region tag retail_search_simple_query

Description

Fixes #

Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.

Checklist

  • I have followed Sample Format Guide
  • pom.xml parent set to latest shared-configuration
  • Appropriate changes to README are included in PR
  • These samples need a new API enabled in testing projects to pass (let us know which ones)
  • These samples need a new/updated env vars in testing projects set to pass (let us know which ones)
  • Tests pass: mvn clean verify required
  • Lint passes: mvn -P lint checkstyle:check required
  • Static Analysis: mvn -P lint clean compile pmd:cpd-check spotbugs:check advisory only
  • This sample adds a new sample directory, and I updated the CODEOWNERS file with the codeowners for this sample
  • This sample adds a new Product API, and I updated the Blunderbuss issue/PR auto-assigner with the codeowners for this sample
  • Please merge this PR for me once it is approved

Added region tag retail_search_simple_query
@rebeccaellis rebeccaellis requested review from yoshi-approver and a team as code owners May 21, 2025 20:59
Copy link

google-cla bot commented May 21, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented May 21, 2025

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 1 region tag.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: retail Issues related to the Retail API API. labels May 21, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @rebeccaellis, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. This PR, authored by rebeccaellis, focuses on updating the SearchWithBoostSpec.java file within the retail interactive tutorials. The main intent, as indicated by the title and description, is to add a specific region tag (retail_search_simple_query) to mark a section of the code. This is a common practice for documentation generation tools to extract and highlight code samples.

Highlights

  • Documentation/Code Samples: The primary change involves adding [START] and [END] region tags to the SearchWithBoostSpec.java file. This helps in identifying and extracting the code sample for documentation purposes.

Changelog

  • retail/interactive-tutorials/src/main/java/search/SearchWithBoostSpec.java
    • Added the // [START retail_search_simple_query] tag at line 24 to mark the beginning of the code sample.
    • Added the // [END retail_search_simple_query] tag at line 85 to mark the end of the code sample.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Tags mark the code,
Documentation finds its way,
Sample now complete.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR adds a region tag retail_search_simple_query to the SearchWithBoostSpec.java file.
The primary feedback concerns the choice of this tag name for this specific file, given its content (which includes boost specifications) and the existence of a potentially simpler example in SearchSimpleQuery.java. Addressing this will help ensure clarity for users of these samples.

Please also remember to update the placeholder <ISSUE-NUMBER> in the pull request description with the actual issue number.

Summary of Findings

  • Region Tag Clarity and Placement: The region tag retail_search_simple_query added to SearchWithBoostSpec.java might cause confusion. This file demonstrates search with boost specifications, while a simpler example (SearchSimpleQuery.java) exists. It's suggested to reconsider the tag name or its placement for better clarity and discoverability of the samples.
  • PR Description Placeholder: The PR description contains a placeholder <ISSUE-NUMBER> that should be updated with the relevant issue number. (Not commented inline as per review settings).

Merge Readiness

This pull request introduces a region tag to a Java sample file. There is one medium-severity concern regarding the clarity and placement of the retail_search_simple_query tag within SearchWithBoostSpec.java, as detailed in the review comment. It's recommended that this feedback be discussed and addressed to ensure the samples are as clear and discoverable as possible for users. Consequently, I suggest that these changes be considered before merging. As a reviewer, I am not authorized to approve pull requests; approval should be sought from designated maintainers once the feedback is addressed.

@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@

package search;

// [START retail_search_simple_query]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The region tag retail_search_simple_query has been added here. This file, SearchWithBoostSpec.java, demonstrates search functionality that includes BoostSpec (boost specifications), which is a somewhat more advanced feature than what might be implied by "simple query".

Considering there's another file, SearchSimpleQuery.java, in the same package that appears to demonstrate a search without these boost specifications, could you clarify the rationale for placing the retail_search_simple_query tag in this particular file?

To enhance clarity for users looking for specific examples, would it be more appropriate to:

  1. Place the retail_search_simple_query tag in the SearchSimpleQuery.java file instead, as it seems to represent a more basic query example?
  2. Or, use a more descriptive tag for this file, such as retail_search_with_boost_spec, to accurately reflect its content?

This will help ensure that the region tags accurately guide users to the examples that best suit their needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: retail Issues related to the Retail API API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants