add new chat-widget component #56
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces integration with the Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm warn config production Use Tip ⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Review SummarySkipped posting 3 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here. Draft Commentsapp/components/ChatComponents/GooeyChatWidget.tsx:27Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: The issue involves a potentially undefined CSS class which could cause height styling issues. Production impact is low (2) as it's unlikely to break functionality but may affect appearance. Fix specificity is moderate (3) as the solution would be to either define the class or use an existing one. Urgency is low (2) as it's a styling issue that doesn't break core functionality. Total score of 7 is below the threshold of 10, but since we're using PERMISSIVE filtering, we keep the comment. app/renderer.tsx:342-344Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment suggests changing from spread props ({...props}) to passing props as a property (props={props}), which are fundamentally different patterns with different behaviors. The spread syntax expands the props object into individual properties, while the suggested change would pass the entire props object as a single property named 'props'. This would likely break the component's functionality. Analysis: This comment suggests a change that would fundamentally alter how props are passed to the component, likely breaking its functionality. The spread syntax ({...props}) passes each property individually, while props={props} passes the entire object as a single prop. This would require the component to access values via props.props.someValue instead of props.someValue, which would cause runtime errors. The change is specific but incorrect, with high production impact and urgency. remix.config.js:41-41Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment meets the threshold for inclusion Analysis: This is a style-related comment suggesting the use of template literals instead of string concatenation. The fix is extremely specific and directly applicable. However, it has minimal production impact as it's purely stylistic and not a functional issue. The urgency is very low as this is a code style preference that doesn't affect functionality. With a total score of 7, this comment falls below the threshold of 10 required for inclusion. |
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| export default function GooeyChatWidget({ | ||
| state, | ||
| onChange, | ||
| ...rest | ||
| }: GWChatWidgetProps & { | ||
| state: Record<string, any>; | ||
| onChange: (value: string) => void; | ||
| }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correctness: The state prop is declared but never used in the component, which creates unnecessary props and could lead to confusion for developers using this component.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export default function GooeyChatWidget({ | |
| state, | |
| onChange, | |
| ...rest | |
| }: GWChatWidgetProps & { | |
| state: Record<string, any>; | |
| onChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| }) { | |
| export default function GooeyChatWidget({ | |
| onChange, | |
| ...rest | |
| }: GWChatWidgetProps & { | |
| onChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| }) { |
| const handleClear = () => { | ||
| // Handle the clear event here | ||
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | ||
| // You can also call onChange if needed | ||
| // onChange(""); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correctness: The handleClear function doesn't call onChange with an empty string, making the clear functionality incomplete. The commented code should be uncommented to properly reset the state.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| // onChange(""); | |
| }; | |
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | |
| // Reset the state when clearing the chat | |
| onChange(""); | |
| }; |
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | ||
| // Handle the send event here | ||
| console.log("Message sent:", message); | ||
| // You can also call onChange if needed | ||
| onChange(message); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const handleClear = () => { | ||
| // Handle the clear event here | ||
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | ||
| // You can also call onChange if needed | ||
| // onChange(""); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: The component contains console.log statements that should be removed before production code is committed, as they can expose sensitive information and impact performance.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | |
| // Handle the send event here | |
| console.log("Message sent:", message); | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| onChange(message); | |
| }; | |
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| // onChange(""); | |
| }; | |
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | |
| // Handle the send event here | |
| onChange(message); | |
| }; | |
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| onChange(""); | |
| }; |
| def gooey_chat_widget( | ||
| messages, | ||
| config, | ||
| **props, | ||
| ): | ||
| return core.RenderTreeNode( | ||
| name="gw-chat-widget", | ||
| props=dict( | ||
| messages=messages, | ||
| config=config, | ||
| **props, | ||
| ), | ||
| ).mount() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correctness: The gooey_chat_widget function returns the result of .mount() which is likely None, but should return a core.NestingCtx object like other similar widget functions in the file.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| def gooey_chat_widget( | |
| messages, | |
| config, | |
| **props, | |
| ): | |
| return core.RenderTreeNode( | |
| name="gw-chat-widget", | |
| props=dict( | |
| messages=messages, | |
| config=config, | |
| **props, | |
| ), | |
| ).mount() | |
| def gooey_chat_widget( | |
| messages, | |
| config, | |
| **props, | |
| ): | |
| node = core.RenderTreeNode( | |
| name="gw-chat-widget", | |
| props=dict( | |
| messages=messages, | |
| config=config, | |
| **props, | |
| ), | |
| ) | |
| node.mount() | |
| return core.NestingCtx(node) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
py/gooey_gui/components/common.py (1)
925-939: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd type hints and documentation to the new function.
The new
gooey_chat_widgetfunction follows the module's pattern for component functions but lacks type hints and documentation that would help users understand its purpose and usage.-def gooey_chat_widget( - messages, - config, - **props, -): +def gooey_chat_widget( + messages: list[dict], + config: dict, + **props, +) -> core.RenderTreeNode: + """ + Create a chat widget using the gooey-web-widget library. + + Args: + messages: List of message objects to display in the chat + config: Configuration options for the chat widget + **props: Additional properties to pass to the widget + + Returns: + Mounted RenderTreeNode for the chat widget + """ return core.RenderTreeNode( name="gw-chat-widget", props=dict( messages=messages, config=config, **props, ), ).mount()
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/components/ChatComponents/GooeyChatWidget.tsx (1)
3-10: Improve props typing with more specific state interface.Using a generic
Record<string, any>for the state prop makes the component less type-safe. Consider creating a more specific interface that describes the expected state structure.+interface ChatWidgetState { + messages?: Array<{ + text: string; + role: 'user' | 'assistant'; + // Add other message properties as needed + }>; + // Add other state properties as needed +} export default function GooeyChatWidget({ state, onChange, ...rest }: GWChatWidgetProps & { - state: Record<string, any>; + state: ChatWidgetState; onChange: (value: string) => void; }) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.gitignore(1 hunks)app/components/ChatComponents/GooeyChatWidget.tsx(1 hunks)app/renderer.tsx(2 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)py/gooey_gui/components/common.py(1 hunks)remix.config.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
app/renderer.tsx (1)
app/components/ChatComponents/GooeyChatWidget.tsx (1)
GooeyChatWidget(3-35)
py/gooey_gui/components/common.py (1)
py/gooey_gui/core/renderer.py (2)
RenderTreeNode(30-37)mount(35-37)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.gitignore (1)
2-3: Good addition of yalc-related entriesThe addition of
.yalcandyalc.lockto .gitignore is appropriate for managing the local development dependencies referenced in package.json.remix.config.js (1)
33-33: Correctly configured server-side bundlingAdding the
gooey-web-widgetpattern toserverDependenciesToBundleensures proper server-side rendering and functionality of the new widget component.package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump appropriately tracks new featureThe increment from 0.5.3 to 0.5.4 properly reflects the addition of a new feature component.
47-47: Local development dependency correctly addedThe
gooey-web-widgetdependency is correctly added as a local reference via yalc for development purposes.app/renderer.tsx (2)
25-25: Appropriate import of new componentThe import of the new
GooeyChatWidgetcomponent is correctly placed among other component imports.
342-344: Widget integration follows established patternsThe integration of the chat widget follows the same pattern as other widget types in the renderer, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
However, from the provided snippet of
GooeyChatWidget.tsx, note that thehandleClearfunction doesn't callonChange(the line is commented out). Ensure this is intentional behavior.
| "react": "^18.2.0", | ||
| "react-dom": "^18.2.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
React version upgrade requires type definition updates
React and ReactDOM have been upgraded from v17 to v18.2.0, but the type definitions in devDependencies still reference v17 (lines 77-78).
Update the TypeScript type definitions to match the React version:
- "@types/react": "^17.0.2",
- "@types/react-dom": "^17.0.2",
+ "@types/react": "^18.2.0",
+ "@types/react-dom": "^18.2.0",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "react": "^18.2.0", | |
| "react-dom": "^18.2.0", | |
| "@types/react": "^18.2.0", | |
| "@types/react-dom": "^18.2.0", |
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | ||
| // Handle the send event here | ||
| console.log("Message sent:", message); | ||
| // You can also call onChange if needed | ||
| onChange(message); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log statement in production code.
Console statements should be removed from production code as they can impact performance and may leak sensitive information.
const handleSend = (message: string) => {
// Handle the send event here
- console.log("Message sent:", message);
// You can also call onChange if needed
onChange(message);
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | |
| // Handle the send event here | |
| console.log("Message sent:", message); | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| onChange(message); | |
| }; | |
| const handleSend = (message: string) => { | |
| // Handle the send event here | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| onChange(message); | |
| }; |
| const handleClear = () => { | ||
| // Handle the clear event here | ||
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | ||
| // You can also call onChange if needed | ||
| // onChange(""); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Resolve commented-out code and remove console.log.
The handler contains a commented-out onChange call and a console log statement. Either uncomment the onChange call if it's needed or remove the comment entirely, and remove the console log statement.
const handleClear = () => {
// Handle the clear event here
- console.log("Chat cleared");
// You can also call onChange if needed
- // onChange("");
+ onChange(""); // Uncomment if you need to notify parent component of clearing
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| console.log("Chat cleared"); | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| // onChange(""); | |
| }; | |
| const handleClear = () => { | |
| // Handle the clear event here | |
| // You can also call onChange if needed | |
| onChange(""); // Uncomment if you need to notify parent component of clearing | |
| }; |
No description provided.