Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding project count condition #4985

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Jan 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated email verification banner display logic to only show for users with at least one project

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 29, 2025 10:48am

@kkatusic kkatusic self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@kkatusic has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1c6b4a and f304885.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the UserProfileView component's rendering logic for the VerifyEmailBanner. The key change is an additional condition that now requires a user to have at least one project (user.projectsCount > 0) before displaying the email verification banner. This refinement ensures that the banner is only shown for users who have started creating projects, in addition to the existing checks for user authentication and unverified email status.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx Modified conditional rendering of VerifyEmailBanner to include a check for user.projectsCount > 0

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jainkrati
  • mateodaza

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Where banners hide from newbie's sight
Until a project takes its flight
One count, one check, email's delight!
Verification's clever might! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx (1)

127-132: Consider UX implications of hiding email verification banner.

The current change hides the email verification banner from users without projects. Consider if this is the intended behavior, as:

  1. Users might need verified emails for other features beyond project creation
  2. It might be better to encourage email verification early in the user journey

Consider one of these alternatives:

  1. Show the banner for all users but customize the message based on projectsCount
  2. Document why email verification is only required for users with projects
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Build

[error] 129-129: Type error: 'user.projectsCount' is possibly 'undefined'.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96b3b45 and a1c6b4a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Build
src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx

[error] 129-129: Type error: 'user.projectsCount' is possibly 'undefined'.

src/components/views/userProfile/UserProfile.view.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit a736774 into develop Jan 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the fix/email_verify_notification branch January 29, 2025 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants