Harmonise Simulation and formula parameter values

[gowerc]

Closes #349

Bit of a deviation from the original issue. The initial values are indeed correct but there was a bit of inconsistency that the model and formulas were specifying the raw value but the simulation functions were specifying the exp(value). I've updated the simulation functions to specify the raw value so that everything is consistent.

Sorry to re-explain that I originally thought the initial values were wrong because they were so wildly different to the values I was specifying in the simulation function. But they aren't wrong they are just on different scales which is confusing so I have harmonised the scales.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                           Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
-------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  --------------------------------
R/brier_score.R                      166       0  100.00%
R/DataJoint.R                         76       2  97.37%   264, 270
R/DataLongitudinal.R                 119       1  99.16%   244
R/DataSubject.R                       85       1  98.82%   142
R/DataSurvival.R                      98       0  100.00%
R/defaults.R                          10       6  40.00%   18-57, 84
R/generics.R                          31       4  87.10%   51, 395, 414, 449
R/Grid.R                              27       1  96.30%   173
R/GridEven.R                          32       0  100.00%
R/GridEvent.R                         22       0  100.00%
R/GridFixed.R                         30       0  100.00%
R/GridGrouped.R                       52       0  100.00%
R/GridManual.R                        23       3  86.96%   78-80
R/GridObserved.R                      20       0  100.00%
R/GridPopulation.R                    31       4  87.10%   61, 69-71
R/GridPrediction.R                    36       6  83.33%   83, 91-95
R/JointModel.R                       123       8  93.50%   141-143, 193, 197, 239, 285, 291
R/JointModelSamples.R                 59       0  100.00%
R/link_generics.R                     13       3  76.92%   59, 76, 91
R/Link.R                              62       4  93.55%   200-203
R/LinkComponent.R                     19       3  84.21%   88, 120-121
R/LongitudinalGSF.R                   82       0  100.00%
R/LongitudinalModel.R                 19       0  100.00%
R/LongitudinalQuantities.R            71       0  100.00%
R/LongitudinalRandomSlope.R           41       5  87.80%   93-97
R/LongitudinalSteinFojo.R             75       5  93.33%   143-147
R/Parameter.R                         14       0  100.00%
R/ParameterList.R                     42       1  97.62%   184
R/Prior.R                            236       8  96.61%   481, 577, 589-607
R/Promise.R                           25       0  100.00%
R/Quantities.R                        60       0  100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPopulation.R       22       0  100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorPrediction.R       48       0  100.00%
R/QuantityGeneratorSubject.R          19       0  100.00%
R/settings.R                          12      12  0.00%    55-69
R/SimGroup.R                           5       0  100.00%
R/SimJointData.R                      72       1  98.61%   103
R/SimLongitudinal.R                    5       2  60.00%   22, 40
R/SimLongitudinalGSF.R                53       0  100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalRandomSlope.R        42       0  100.00%
R/SimLongitudinalSteinFojo.R          50       0  100.00%
R/SimSurvival.R                      104       0  100.00%
R/StanModel.R                         15       0  100.00%
R/StanModule.R                       176       6  96.59%   192-193, 235, 246, 383, 411
R/SurvivalExponential.R               10       0  100.00%
R/SurvivalLoglogistic.R               11       0  100.00%
R/SurvivalModel.R                     19       0  100.00%
R/SurvivalQuantities.R               170       1  99.41%   125
R/SurvivalWeibullPH.R                 11       0  100.00%
R/utilities.R                        143       1  99.30%   13
R/zzz.R                               28      25  10.71%   3, 8-12, 14-35, 47
TOTAL                               2814     113  95.98%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 2306065

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
JointModelSamples	💔	$33.34$	$+1.79$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
Grid	💔	$39.79$	$+1.16$	Grid_objects_work_with_QuantityGenerator_and_QuantityCollapser
GridPrediction	💔	$152.08$	$+4.47$	GridPrediction_works_as_expected_for_Survival_models
JointModelSamples	💔	$33.34$	$+1.79$	print_works_as_expected_for_JointModelSamples
LongitudinalQuantiles	💔	$42.78$	$+1.17$	Test_that_LongitudinalQuantities_works_as_expected

Results for commit a9be1f5

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files  140 suites   7m 25s ⏱️
131 tests 104 ✅ 27 💤 0 ❌
934 runs  902 ✅ 32 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 2306065.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.