BACKPORT: ChromeOS EC patches #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…l devices Atmel touch controller driver no longer respects suspend mode specified in platform data, so let's stop setting it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Define pr_fmt() to standardize driver messages. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
This will make code instantiating I2C device a bit clearer. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Instead of having separate setup() functions responsible for instantiating i2c client for each peripheral, let's generalize the behavior and use common code for instantiating all i2c peripherals. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Instead of trying to parse DMI IRQ data every time we try to instantiate a device, let's do it once, when we identify the device we are working with. This allows us to mark chromeos_laptop_get_irq_from_dmi() as __init and discard it once module is initialized. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Instead of using platform device and deferrals to handle the case when i2C adapters appear late in the game, and not handling device unbinding all that well, let's switch to using I2C bus notifier to get told when a new I2C adapter appears in the system, and attempt to add appropriate devices at that time. In case when we have 2 Designware adapters in the system (Acer C720), instead of counting and hoping they get enumerate din the right order, let's switch to using their PCI devids (slot/function) that should be stable. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
…igger Instead of passing interrupt flags via platform data to drivers, or hoping that drivers will do the right thing and set it up the way we need, let's set up IRQ resource and attach it to the I2C board info, and let I2C core set it up for us. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Now that Atmel driver uses generic device properties we can use them instead of platform data when setting up touchpad on the original Google Pixel. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Mark board data as __intconst/__initdata and make a copy of appropriate entry once we identified the board we are running on. The rest of the data will be discarded once the kernel finished booting (or module finished loading). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Chrome platform installed a Chrome EC notify handler which prevents default EC GPE handler getting called. Add pm_system_wakeup to the Chrome EC notify handler so wake up from s2idle can happen. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenkai Du <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
…stom coreboot firmware This patch adds generic device information to the DMI table of the cros_ec_lpc driver, needed for Chromebooks/boxes using a custom coreboot firmware. The DMI info would not contain "Google_*" as BIOS version string, instead the system vendor string would still be "GOOGLE", so this seems to be a reasonable match for every Chromebook/box running a custom firmware. Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bellizzi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
When accessing a sysfs attribute, if the EC command fails, -EPROTO is now returned instead of an error message as it is unlikely an app is parsing the error message to do something meaningful. Also, this patch makes use of cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() instead of cros_ec_cmd_xfer() so an error message is printed in the syslog. Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Add a define to get the cros_ec_dev from device and use it. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
…ariants Use DEVICE_ATTR variants for read/write attributes. This simplifies the source code, improves readbility, and reduces the chance of inconsistencies. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Fixed the following checkpatch warning:
WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider
using octal permissions '0444'.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
…e lid angle This adds a sysfs attribute (/sys/class/chromeos/cros_ec/kb_wake_angle) used to set and get the keyboard wake lid angle. This attribute is present only if 2 accelerometers are controlled by the EC. This patch also moves the cros_ec features check before the device is added so the features map obtained from the EC is ready on time. Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
…ound Older models of Chromebooks did not describe the LPC EC in their ACPI tables; starting with Strago-based devices Google is using GOOG0004 device to describe EC LPC. DMI-based match is fragile and does not work reliably, especially when using custom firmware. It is also not needed when we can locate the right ACPI device, so let's stop bailing out when DMI does not match but the right ACPI device is present. Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
This reverts commit e04653a. It is no longer needed to install Chrome EC GPE handler to have GPE enabled in suspend to idle path. It is found that with this handler installed, EC wake up doesn't work because default EC event handler that can wake up system is not getting called. Signed-off-by: Wenkai Du <[email protected]> Acked-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Commit 001dde9 ("mfd: cros ec: spi: Fix "in progress" error signaling") pointed out some bad code, but its analysis and conclusion was not 100% correct. It *is* correct that we should not propagate result==EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS for transport errors, because this has a special meaning -- that we should follow up with EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS until the EC is no longer busy. This is definitely the wrong thing for many commands, because among other problems, EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS doesn't actually retrieve any RX data from the EC, so commands that expected some data back will instead start processing junk. For such commands, the right answer is to either propagate the error (and return that error to the caller) or resend the original command (*not* EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS). Unfortunately, commit 001dde9 forgets a crucial point: that for some long-running operations, the EC physically cannot respond to commands any more. For example, with EC_CMD_FLASH_ERASE, the EC may be re-flashing its own code regions, so it can't respond to SPI interrupts. Instead, the EC prepares us ahead of time for being busy for a "long" time, and fills its hardware buffer with EC_SPI_PAST_END. Thus, we expect to see several "transport" errors (or, messages filled with EC_SPI_PAST_END). So we should really translate that to a retryable error (-EAGAIN) and continue sending EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS until we get a ready status. IOW, it is actually important to treat some of these "junk" values as retryable errors. Together with commit 001dde9, this resolves bugs like the following: 1. EC_CMD_FLASH_ERASE now works again (with commit 001dde9, we would abort the first time we saw EC_SPI_PAST_END) 2. Before commit 001dde9, transport errors (e.g., EC_SPI_RX_BAD_DATA) seen in other commands (e.g., EC_CMD_RTC_GET_VALUE) used to yield junk data in the RX buffer; they will now yield -EAGAIN return values, and tools like 'hwclock' will simply fail instead of retrieving and re-programming undefined time values Fixes: 001dde9 ("mfd: cros ec: spi: Fix "in progress" error signaling") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Add a kernel driver for GOOG0006, an ACPI driver reporting an event when the tablet switch status changes. On an ACPI based convertible chromebook check evtest display tablet mode switch changes: Available devices: .. /dev/input/event3: Tablet Mode Switch .. Testing ... (interrupt to exit) Event: time 1484879712.604360, type 5 (EV_SW), code 1 (SW_TABLET_MODE), value 1 Event: time 1484879712.604360, -------------- SYN_REPORT ------------ Event: time 1484879715.132228, type 5 (EV_SW), code 1 (SW_TABLET_MODE), value 0 Event: time 1484879715.132228, -------------- SYN_REPORT ------------ ... Check state is updated at resume time when different from suspend time. Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
BayTrail-based and newer Chromebooks describe their peripherals in ACPI; unfortunately their description is not complete, and peripherals drivers, such as driver for Atmel Touch controllers, has to resort to DMI-matching to configure the peripherals properly. To avoid polluting peripheral driver code, let's teach chromeos_laptop driver to supply missing data via generic device properties. Note we supply "compatible" string for Atmel peripherals not because it is needed for matching devices and driver (matching is still done on ACPI HID entries), but because peripherals driver will be using presence of "compatible" property to determine if device properties have been attached to the device, and fail to bind if they are absent. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
Without CONFIG_INPUT, or with a modular input layer and built-in tablet driver, we get a link error: ERROR: "input_event" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined! ERROR: "input_register_device" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined! ERROR: "input_set_capability" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined! ERROR: "devm_input_allocate_device" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined! This adds the corresponding Kconfig dependency Fixes: b418f74 ("platform: chrome: Add Tablet Switch ACPI driver") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
If we cannot communicate with the EC chip to detect the protocol version and its features, it's very likely useless to continue. Else we will commit all kind of uninformed mistakes (using the wrong protocol, the wrong buffer size, mixing the EC with other chips). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <[email protected]> Acked-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Free the IRQ we might have requested when removing the cros_ec device, so we can unload and reload the driver properly. Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Acked-by: Vincent Palatin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
We should stop our worker thread while we're suspended. If we don't then we'll get messages like: cros-ec-spi spi5.0: spi transfer failed: -108 cros-ec-spi spi5.0: cs-deassert spi transfer failed: -108 cros-ec-ctl cros-ec-ctl.0.auto: EC communication failed Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Check whether this EC instance has RTC host command support and instatiate the RTC driver as a subdevice in such case. Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Reboot or shutdown during delayed works could corrupt communication with EC and certain I2C controller may not be able to recover from the error state. This patch registers a shutdown callback used to cancel the debugfs log worker thread. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Add ACPI module device table for matching cros-ec devices to load the cros_ec_i2c driver automatically. Signed-off-by: Wei-Ning Huang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Benson Leung <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
This was implemented by 7764be9
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 6617dfd ] Commit 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") tried to fix the issue where seq_file pos is not increased if a NULL element is returned with seq_ops->next(). See bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 The commit effectively does: - increase pos for all seq_ops->start() - increase pos for all seq_ops->next() For ipv6_route, increasing pos for all seq_ops->next() is correct. But increasing pos for seq_ops->start() is not correct since pos is used to determine how many items to skip during seq_ops->start(): iter->skip = *pos; seq_ops->start() just fetches the *current* pos item. The item can be skipped only after seq_ops->show() which essentially is the beginning of seq_ops->next(). For example, I have 7 ipv6 route entries, root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=4096 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000004 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 1050 bytes (1.0 kB, 1.0 KiB) copied, 0.00707908 s, 148 kB/s root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next In the above, I specify buffer size 4096, so all records can be returned to user space with a single trip to the kernel. If I use buffer size 128, since each record size is 149, internally kernel seq_read() will read 149 into its internal buffer and return the data to user space in two read() syscalls. Then user read() syscall will trigger next seq_ops->start(). Since the current implementation increased pos even for seq_ops->start(), it will skip record #2, #4 and #6, assuming the first record is #1. root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=128 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 4+1 records in 4+1 records out 600 bytes copied, 0.00127758 s, 470 kB/s To fix the problem, create a fake pos pointer so seq_ops->start() won't actually increase seq_file pos. With this fix, the above `dd` command with `bs=128` will show correct result. Fixes: 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 7b50ee3 ] In the function node_lost_contact(), we call __skb_queue_purge() without grabbing the list->lock. This can cause to a race-condition why processing the list 'namedq' in calling path tipc_named_rcv()->tipc_named_dequeue(). [] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [] PGD 7ca63067 P4D 7ca63067 PUD 6c553067 PMD 0 [] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [] CPU: 1 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Tainted: G O 5.9.0-rc6+ #2 [] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS [...] [] RIP: 0010:tipc_named_rcv+0x103/0x320 [tipc] [] Code: 41 89 44 24 10 49 8b 16 49 8b 46 08 49 c7 06 00 00 00 [...] [] RSP: 0018:ffffc900000a7c58 EFLAGS: 00000282 [] RAX: 00000000000012ec RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807bde1270 [] RDX: 0000000000002c7c RSI: 0000000000002c7c RDI: ffff88807b38f1a8 [] RBP: ffff88807b006288 R08: ffff88806a367800 R09: ffff88806a367900 [] R10: ffff88806a367a00 R11: ffff88806a367b00 R12: ffff88807b006258 [] R13: ffff88807b00628a R14: ffff888069334d00 R15: ffff88806a434600 [] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888079480000(0000) knlGS:0[...] [] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000077320000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [] Call Trace: [] ? tipc_bcast_rcv+0x9a/0x1a0 [tipc] [] tipc_rcv+0x40d/0x670 [tipc] [] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xa/0x20 [] tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x55/0x80 [tipc] [] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x8c/0xa0 [] process_backlog+0x98/0x140 [] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x420 [] __do_softirq+0xdb/0x316 [] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2f/0x1e0 [] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x74/0x1e0 [] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x14e/0x1e0 [] run_ksoftirqd+0x1a/0x40 [] smpboot_thread_fn+0x149/0x1e0 [] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [] kthread+0x131/0x150 [] ? kthread_unuse_mm+0xa0/0xa0 [] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [] Modules linked in: veth tipc(O) ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel [...] [] CR2: 0000000000000000 [] ---[ end trace 65c276a8e2e2f310 ]--- To fix this, we need to grab the lock of the 'namedq' list on both path calling. Fixes: cad2929 ("tipc: update a binding service via broadcast") Acked-by: Jon Maloy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
…vents [ Upstream commit bef69bd ] It was reported that 'perf stat' crashed when using with armv8_pmu (CPU) events with the task mode. As 'perf stat' uses an empty cpu map for task mode but armv8_pmu has its own cpu mask, it has confused which map it should use when accessing file descriptors and this causes segfaults: (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000603fc8 in perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu (evsel=<optimized out>, cpu=<optimized out>) at evsel.c:122 #1 perf_evsel__close_cpu (evsel=evsel@entry=0x716e950, cpu=7) at evsel.c:156 #2 0x00000000004d4718 in evlist__close (evlist=0x70a7cb0) at util/evlist.c:1242 #3 0x0000000000453404 in __run_perf_stat (argc=3, argc@entry=1, argv=0x30, argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90, run_idx=119, run_idx@entry=1701998435) at builtin-stat.c:929 #4 0x0000000000455058 in run_perf_stat (run_idx=1701998435, argv=0xfffffaea2f90, argc=1) at builtin-stat.c:947 #5 cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0xfffffaea2f90) at builtin-stat.c:2357 #6 0x00000000004bb888 in run_builtin (p=p@entry=0x9764b8 <commands+288>, argc=argc@entry=4, argv=argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:312 #7 0x00000000004bbb54 in handle_internal_command (argc=argc@entry=4, argv=argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:364 #8 0x0000000000435378 in run_argv (argcp=<synthetic pointer>, argv=<synthetic pointer>) at perf.c:408 #9 main (argc=4, argv=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:538 To fix this, I simply used the given cpu map unless the evsel actually is not a system-wide event (like uncore events). Fixes: 7736627 ("perf stat: Use affinity for closing file descriptors") Reported-by: Wei Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Tested-by: Barry Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
…eate [ Upstream commit da62cb7 ] I got a use-after-free report when doing some fuzz test: If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" will be freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" again. BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150 CPU: 0 PID: 24282 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G B W 5.7.0-rc4-msan #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220 kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0 __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0 drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150 drm_gem_free_mmap_offset drm_gem_object_release+0x159/0x180 drm_gem_vram_init drm_gem_vram_create+0x7c5/0x990 drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590 drm_mode_create_dumb drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710 drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240 vfs_ioctl ksys_ioctl __do_sys_ioctl __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70 do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x4689b9 Code: fd e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f368fa4dc98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000076bf00 RCX: 00000000004689b9 RDX: 0000000020000240 RSI: 00000000c02064b2 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00000000004d17e0 R14: 00007f368fa4e6d4 R15: 000000000076bf0c Uninit was created at: kmsan_save_stack_with_flags kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x66/0xd0 kmsan_slab_free+0x6e/0xb0 slab_free_freelist_hook slab_free kfree+0x571/0x30a0 drm_gem_vram_destroy ttm_buffer_object_destroy+0xc8/0x130 ttm_bo_release kref_put ttm_bo_put+0x117d/0x23e0 ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x11c0/0x11d0 ttm_bo_init+0x289/0x3f0 drm_gem_vram_init drm_gem_vram_create+0x775/0x990 drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590 drm_mode_create_dumb drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710 drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240 vfs_ioctl ksys_ioctl __do_sys_ioctl __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70 do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" will be freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free "gbo" again. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jia Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 435ccfa ] With SO_RCVLOWAT, under memory pressure, it is possible to enter a state where: 1. We have not received enough bytes to satisfy SO_RCVLOWAT. 2. We have not entered buffer pressure (see tcp_rmem_pressure()). 3. But, we do not have enough buffer space to accept more packets. In this case, we advertise 0 rwnd (due to #3) but the application does not drain the receive queue (no wakeup because of #1 and #2) so the flow stalls. Modify the heuristic for SO_RCVLOWAT so that, if we are advertising rwnd<=rcv_mss, force a wakeup to prevent a stall. Without this patch, setting tcp_rmem to 6143 and disabling TCP autotune causes a stalled flow. With this patch, no stall occurs. This is with RPC-style traffic with large messages. Fixes: 03f45c8 ("tcp: avoid extra wakeups for SO_RCVLOWAT users") Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <[email protected]> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 27dada0 ] The defer ops code has been finishing items in the wrong order -- if a top level defer op creates items A and B, and finishing item A creates more defer ops A1 and A2, we'll put the new items on the end of the chain and process them in the order A B A1 A2. This is kind of weird, since it's convenient for programmers to be able to think of A and B as an ordered sequence where all the sub-tasks for A must finish before we move on to B, e.g. A A1 A2 D. Right now, our log intent items are not so complex that this matters, but this will become important for the atomic extent swapping patchset. In order to maintain correct reference counting of extents, we have to unmap and remap extents in that order, and we want to complete that work before moving on to the next range that the user wants to swap. This patch fixes defer ops to satsify that requirement. The primary symptom of the incorrect order was noticed in an early performance analysis of the atomic extent swap code. An astonishingly large number of deferred work items accumulated when userspace requested an atomic update of two very fragmented files. The cause of this was traced to the same ordering bug in the inner loop of xfs_defer_finish_noroll. If the ->finish_item method of a deferred operation queues new deferred operations, those new deferred ops are appended to the tail of the pending work list. To illustrate, say that a caller creates a transaction t0 with four deferred operations D0-D3. The first thing defer ops does is roll the transaction to t1, leaving us with: t1: D0(t0), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) Let's say that finishing each of D0-D3 will create two new deferred ops. After finish D0 and roll, we'll have the following chain: t2: D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1) d4 and d5 were logged to t1. Notice that while we're about to start work on D1, we haven't actually completed all the work implied by D0 being finished. So far we've been careful (or lucky) to structure the dfops callers such that D1 doesn't depend on d4 or d5 being finished, but this is a potential logic bomb. There's a second problem lurking. Let's see what happens as we finish D1-D3: t3: D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2) t4: D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3) t5: d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) Let's say that d4-d11 are simple work items that don't queue any other operations, which means that we can complete each d4 and roll to t6: t6: d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) t7: d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) ... t11: d10(t4), d11(t4) t12: d11(t4) <done> When we try to roll to transaction #12, we're holding defer op d11, which we logged way back in t4. This means that the tail of the log is pinned at t4. If the log is very small or there are a lot of other threads updating metadata, this means that we might have wrapped the log and cannot get roll to t11 because there isn't enough space left before we'd run into t4. Let's shift back to the original failure. I mentioned before that I discovered this flaw while developing the atomic file update code. In that scenario, we have a defer op (D0) that finds a range of file blocks to remap, creates a handful of new defer ops to do that, and then asks to be continued with however much work remains. So, D0 is the original swapext deferred op. The first thing defer ops does is rolls to t1: t1: D0(t0) We try to finish D0, logging d1 and d2 in the process, but can't get all the work done. We log a done item and a new intent item for the work that D0 still has to do, and roll to t2: t2: D0'(t1), d1(t1), d2(t1) We roll and try to finish D0', but still can't get all the work done, so we log a done item and a new intent item for it, requeue D0 a second time, and roll to t3: t3: D0''(t2), d1(t1), d2(t1), d3(t2), d4(t2) If it takes 48 more rolls to complete D0, then we'll finally dispense with D0 in t50: t50: D<fifty primes>(t49), d1(t1), ..., d102(t50) We then try to roll again to get a chain like this: t51: d1(t1), d2(t1), ..., d101(t50), d102(t50) ... t152: d102(t50) <done> Notice that in rolling to transaction #51, we're holding on to a log intent item for d1 that was logged in transaction #1. This means that the tail of the log is pinned at t1. If the log is very small or there are a lot of other threads updating metadata, this means that we might have wrapped the log and cannot roll to t51 because there isn't enough space left before we'd run into t1. This is of course problem #2 again. But notice the third problem with this scenario: we have 102 defer ops tied to this transaction! Each of these items are backed by pinned kernel memory, which means that we risk OOM if the chains get too long. Yikes. Problem #1 is a subtle logic bomb that could hit someone in the future; problem #2 applies (rarely) to the current upstream, and problem #3 applies to work under development. This is not how incremental deferred operations were supposed to work. The dfops design of logging in the same transaction an intent-done item and a new intent item for the work remaining was to make it so that we only have to juggle enough deferred work items to finish that one small piece of work. Deferred log item recovery will find that first unfinished work item and restart it, no matter how many other intent items might follow it in the log. Therefore, it's ok to put the new intents at the start of the dfops chain. For the first example, the chains look like this: t2: d4(t1), d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) t3: d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) ... t9: d9(t7), D3(t0) t10: D3(t0) t11: d10(t10), d11(t10) t12: d11(t10) For the second example, the chains look like this: t1: D0(t0) t2: d1(t1), d2(t1), D0'(t1) t3: d2(t1), D0'(t1) t4: D0'(t1) t5: d1(t4), d2(t4), D0''(t4) ... t148: D0<50 primes>(t147) t149: d101(t148), d102(t148) t150: d102(t148) <done> This actually sucks more for pinning the log tail (we try to roll to t10 while holding an intent item that was logged in t1) but we've solved problem #1. We've also reduced the maximum chain length from: sum(all the new items) + nr_original_items to: max(new items that each original item creates) + nr_original_items This solves problem #3 by sharply reducing the number of defer ops that can be attached to a transaction at any given time. The change makes the problem of log tail pinning worse, but is improvement we need to solve problem #2. Actually solving #2, however, is left to the next patch. Note that a subsequent analysis of some hard-to-trigger reflink and COW livelocks on extremely fragmented filesystems (or systems running a lot of IO threads) showed the same symptoms -- uncomfortably large numbers of incore deferred work items and occasional stalls in the transaction grant code while waiting for log reservations. I think this patch and the next one will also solve these problems. As originally written, the code used list_splice_tail_init instead of list_splice_init, so change that, and leave a short comment explaining our actions. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit ce3653a ] The trace below can appear: [83613.832200] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [83613.837248] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [83613.842808] turning off the locking correctness validator. [83613.848375] CPU: 3 PID: 141 Comm: kworker/3:2H Tainted: G O 5.6.13-silabs15 #2 [83613.857019] Hardware name: BCM2835 [83613.860605] Workqueue: events_highpri bh_work [wfx] [83613.865552] Backtrace: [83613.868041] [<c010f2cc>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010f7b8>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [83613.881463] [<c010f798>] (show_stack) from [<c0d82138>] (dump_stack+0xe8/0x114) [83613.888882] [<c0d82050>] (dump_stack) from [<c01a02ec>] (register_lock_class+0x748/0x768) [83613.905035] [<c019fba4>] (register_lock_class) from [<c019da04>] (__lock_acquire+0x88/0x13dc) [83613.924192] [<c019d97c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f6a4>] (lock_acquire+0xe8/0x274) [83613.942644] [<c019f5bc>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0daa5dc>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x6c) [83613.961714] [<c0daa584>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0ab3248>] (skb_dequeue+0x24/0x78) [83613.974967] [<c0ab3224>] (skb_dequeue) from [<bf330db0>] (wfx_tx_queues_get+0x96c/0x1294 [wfx]) [83613.989728] [<bf330444>] (wfx_tx_queues_get [wfx]) from [<bf320454>] (bh_work+0x454/0x26d8 [wfx]) [83614.009337] [<bf320000>] (bh_work [wfx]) from [<c014c920>] (process_one_work+0x23c/0x7ec) [83614.028141] [<c014c6e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014cf1c>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x55c) [83614.046861] [<c014ced0>] (worker_thread) from [<c0154c04>] (kthread+0x138/0x168) [83614.064876] [<c0154acc>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) [83614.072200] Exception stack(0xecad3fb0 to 0xecad3ff8) [83614.077323] 3fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [83614.085620] 3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [83614.093914] 3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Indeed, the code of wfx_add_interface() shows that the interface is enabled to early. So, the spinlock associated with some skb_queue may not yet initialized when wfx_tx_queues_get() is called. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
…adlock [ Upstream commit df64880 ] After base_lock which occupy by ath11k_regd_update, the softirq run for WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EVENTID maybe arrived and it also need to accuire the spin lock, then deadlock happend, change to disable softirqis to solve it. [ 235.576990] ================================ [ 235.576991] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 235.576993] 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ #196 Not tainted [ 235.576994] -------------------------------- [ 235.576995] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 235.576997] kworker/u16:1/98 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 235.576998] ffff9655f75cad98 (&ab->base_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577009] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 235.577013] __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0 [ 235.577015] lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270 [ 235.577018] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70 [ 235.577023] ath11k_reg_chan_list_event.isra.0+0x10d/0x1e0 [ath11k] [ 235.577028] ath11k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x3c3/0x560 [ath11k] [ 235.577033] ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k] [ 235.577039] ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k] [ 235.577041] ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci] [ 235.577043] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0 [ 235.577045] __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482 [ 235.577046] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 235.577048] do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60 [ 235.577049] irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0 [ 235.577050] common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190 [ 235.577052] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 [ 235.577053] cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60 [ 235.577055] do_idle+0x5f/0xe0 [ 235.577056] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 [ 235.577058] start_kernel+0x443/0x464 [ 235.577060] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 235.577061] irq event stamp: 432035 [ 235.577063] hardirqs last enabled at (432035): [<ffffffff968d12b4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x40 [ 235.577064] hardirqs last disabled at (432034): [<ffffffff968d10d3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x80 [ 235.577066] softirqs last enabled at (431998): [<ffffffff967115c1>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3f1/0x430 [ 235.577067] softirqs last disabled at (431996): [<ffffffff9671159f>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3cf/0x430 [ 235.577068] [ 235.577068] other info that might help us debug this: [ 235.577069] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 235.577069] [ 235.577070] CPU0 [ 235.577070] ---- [ 235.577071] lock(&ab->base_lock); [ 235.577072] <Interrupt> [ 235.577073] lock(&ab->base_lock); [ 235.577074] [ 235.577074] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 235.577074] [ 235.577075] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:1/98: [ 235.577076] #0: ffff9655f75b1d48 ((wq_completion)ath11k_qmi_driver_event){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0 [ 235.577079] #1: ffffa33cc02f3e70 ((work_completion)(&ab->qmi.event_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0 [ 235.577081] #2: ffff9655f75cad50 (&ab->core_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x4e/0x160 [ath11k] [ 235.577087] [ 235.577087] stack backtrace: [ 235.577088] CPU: 3 PID: 98 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ #196 [ 235.577089] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018 [ 235.577095] Workqueue: ath11k_qmi_driver_event ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work [ath11k] [ 235.577096] Call Trace: [ 235.577100] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 235.577102] mark_lock_irq.cold+0x15/0x3c [ 235.577104] mark_lock+0x1d7/0x540 [ 235.577105] mark_usage+0xc7/0x140 [ 235.577107] __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0 [ 235.577108] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0 [ 235.577110] lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270 [ 235.577116] ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577118] ? atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x2d/0x40 [ 235.577120] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70 [ 235.577125] ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577130] ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577136] __ath11k_mac_register+0x3fb/0x480 [ath11k] [ 235.577141] ath11k_mac_register+0x119/0x180 [ath11k] [ 235.577146] ath11k_core_pdev_create+0x17/0xe0 [ath11k] [ 235.577150] ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x65/0x160 [ath11k] [ 235.577155] ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work+0x1c5/0x230 [ath11k] [ 235.577158] process_one_work+0x265/0x5d0 [ 235.577160] worker_thread+0x49/0x300 [ 235.577161] ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0 [ 235.577163] kthread+0x135/0x150 [ 235.577164] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60 [ 235.577166] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1 Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
commit ca10845 upstream. While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
commit 66d204a upstream. Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 #6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee #7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b #8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 #9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 #10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 #11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
commit 7837fa8 upstream. Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
commit d9befed upstream. The metadata buffer is no longer trusted after we read it from disk again because it is not uptodate for some reasons (e.g. failed to write back). Otherwise we may get below memory corruption problem in ext4_ext_split()->memset() if we read stale data from the newly allocated extent block on disk which has been failed to async write out but miss verify again since the verified bit has already been set on the buffer. [ 29.774674] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88841949d000 ... [ 29.783317] Oops: 0002 [#2] SMP [ 29.784219] R10: 00000000000f4240 R11: 0000000000002e28 R12: ffff88842fa1c800 [ 29.784627] CPU: 1 PID: 126 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Tainted: G D W [ 29.785546] R13: ffffffff9cddcc20 R14: ffffffff9cddd420 R15: ffff88842fa1c2f8 [ 29.786679] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),BIOS ?-20190727_0738364 [ 29.787588] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88842fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 29.789288] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn [ 29.790319] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 29.790321] (flush-8:0) [ 29.790844] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 00000004234f2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 29.791924] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 29.792839] RIP: 0010:__memset+0x24/0x30 [ 29.793739] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 29.794256] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 f9 48 89 d1 83 e2 07 48 c1 e9 033 [ 29.795161] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ... [ 29.808149] Call Trace: [ 29.808475] ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x102e/0x1be0 [ 29.809085] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xa89/0x1bb0 [ 29.809652] ext4_map_blocks+0x290/0x8a0 [ 29.809085] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xa89/0x1bb0 [ 29.809652] ext4_map_blocks+0x290/0x8a0 [ 29.810161] ext4_writepages+0xc85/0x17c0 ... Fix this by clearing buffer's verified bit if we read meta block from disk again. Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 5223cc6 ] When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat (with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs/24552: #0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0 #1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs] #2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs] #3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs] #4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue processing roots. Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit 49d11be ] I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem patches on btrfs/104: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #102 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520 process_one_work+0x238/0x540 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903: #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #102 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read lock on the tree_root nodes. To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Couple of fixes Patch #1 fixes firmware flashing when CONFIG_MLXSW_CORE=y and CONFIG_MLXFW=m. Patch #2 prevents EMAD transactions from needlessly failing when the system is under heavy load by using exponential backoff. Please consider patch #2 for stable. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2020
When running test case btrfs/017 from fstests, lockdep reported the
following splat:
[ 1297.067385] ======================================================
[ 1297.067708] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 1297.068022] 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 Not tainted
[ 1297.068322] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 1297.068629] btrfs/189080 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1297.068929] ffff9f2725731690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.069274]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 1297.069868] ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.070219]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 1297.071131]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1297.071721]
-> #1 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 1297.072375] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
[ 1297.072710] __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xb30
[ 1297.073061] btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x59/0x6a0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.073421] create_subvol+0x194/0x990 [btrfs]
[ 1297.073780] btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.074133] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.074498] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x58/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 1297.074872] btrfs_ioctl+0x1a90/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.075245] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 1297.075617] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
[ 1297.075993] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 1297.076380]
-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 1297.077166] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
[ 1297.077572] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110
[ 1297.077984] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
[ 1297.078411] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 1297.078853] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.079323] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.079789] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 1297.080232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
[ 1297.080680] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 1297.081139]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1297.082536] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1297.083510] CPU0 CPU1
[ 1297.084005] ---- ----
[ 1297.084500] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
[ 1297.084994] lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 1297.085485] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
[ 1297.085974] lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 1297.086454]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1297.087880] 3 locks held by btrfs/189080:
[ 1297.088324] #0: ffff9f2725731470 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0xa73/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.088799] #1: ffff9f2702b60cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.089284] #2: ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.089771]
stack backtrace:
[ 1297.090662] CPU: 5 PID: 189080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1
[ 1297.091132] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 1297.092123] Call Trace:
[ 1297.092629] dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5
[ 1297.093115] check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
[ 1297.093596] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
[ 1297.094076] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
[ 1297.094553] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
[ 1297.095029] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110
[ 1297.095510] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
[ 1297.095993] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.096476] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 1297.096962] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.097451] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
[ 1297.097941] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.098429] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs]
[ 1297.098904] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x20c/0x430
[ 1297.099382] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
[ 1297.099854] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
[ 1297.100328] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[ 1297.100801] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12/0x180
[ 1297.101272] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 1297.101739] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 1297.102207] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
[ 1297.102673] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 1297.103148] RIP: 0033:0x7f773ff65d87
This is because during the quota enable ioctl we lock first the mutex
qgroup_ioctl_lock and then start a transaction, and starting a transaction
acquires a fs freeze semaphore (at the VFS level). However, every other
code path, except for the quota disable ioctl path, we do the opposite:
we start a transaction and then lock the mutex.
So fix this by making the quota enable and disable paths to start the
transaction without having the mutex locked, and then, after starting the
transaction, lock the mutex and check if some other task already enabled
or disabled the quotas, bailing with success if that was the case.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2020
This patch introduce a new globs attribute to define the subclass of the
glock lockref spinlock. This avoid the following lockdep warning, which
occurs when we lock an inode lock while an iopen lock is held:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.10.0-rc3+ #4990 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/12 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9067d45672d8 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lockref_get+0x9/0x20
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);
lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
#0: ffff9067c1bfdd38 ((wq_completion)delete_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540
#1: ffffac594006be70 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_delete)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b7/0x540
#2: ffff9067da308588 (&gl->gl_lockref.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_work_func+0x164/0x260
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #4990
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Workqueue: delete_workqueue delete_work_func
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
__lock_acquire.cold+0x19e/0x2e3
lock_acquire+0x150/0x410
? lockref_get+0x9/0x20
_raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40
? lockref_get+0x9/0x20
lockref_get+0x9/0x20
delete_work_func+0x188/0x260
process_one_work+0x237/0x540
worker_thread+0x4d/0x3b0
? process_one_work+0x540/0x540
kthread+0x127/0x140
? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2020
While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed
since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found
below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a
problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog
3 locks held by memhog/946:
#0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160
#1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160
#2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0
CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty #316
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350
unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30
zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0
zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0
zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101
bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0
__swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0
pageout+0xe3/0x3a0
shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60
shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460
We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which
contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc.
Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in
some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have
abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context).
Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made
the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it
has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option
for better maintenance.
[1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]
Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range")
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Harish Sriram <[email protected]>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
reynhout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2020
Prarit reported that depending on the affinity setting the ' irq $N: Affinity broken due to vector space exhaustion.' message is showing up in dmesg, but the vector space on the CPUs in the affinity mask is definitely not exhausted. Shung-Hsi provided traces and analysis which pinpoints the problem: The ordering of trying to assign an interrupt vector in assign_irq_vector_any_locked() is simply wrong if the interrupt data has a valid node assigned. It does: 1) Try the intersection of affinity mask and node mask 2) Try the node mask 3) Try the full affinity mask 4) Try the full online mask Obviously #2 and #3 are in the wrong order as the requested affinity mask has to take precedence. In the observed cases #1 failed because the affinity mask did not contain CPUs from node 0. That made it allocate a vector from node 0, thereby breaking affinity and emitting the misleading message. Revert the order of #2 and #3 so the full affinity mask without the node intersection is tried before actually affinity is broken. If no node is assigned then only the full affinity mask and if that fails the full online mask is tried. Fixes: d6ffc6a ("x86/vector: Respect affinity mask in irq descriptor") Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Hurricos
pushed a commit
to Hurricos/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2020
While doing memory hot-unplug operation on a PowerPC VM running 1024 CPUs
with 11TB of ram, I hit the following panic:
BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000007
Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000456048
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [GalliumOS#2]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS= 2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp
CPU: 160 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G D 5.9.0 #1
NIP: c000000000456048 LR: c000000000455fd4 CTR: c00000000047b350
REGS: c00006028d1b77a0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G D (5.9.0)
MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24004228 XER: 00000000
CFAR: c00000000000f1b0 DAR: 0000000000000007 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0
GPR00: c000000000455fd4 c00006028d1b7a30 c000000001bec800 0000000000000000
GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000 00000000000374ef c00007c53df99320
GPR08: 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000
GPR12: 0000000000004400 c00000001e8e4400 0000000000000000 0000000000000f6a
GPR16: 0000000000000000 c000000001c25930 c000000001d62528 00000000000000c1
GPR20: c000000001d62538 c00006be469e9000 0000000fffffffe0 c0000000003c0ff8
GPR24: 0000000000000018 0000000000000000 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000
GPR28: c00007c513755700 c000000001c236a4 c00007bc4001f800 0000000000000001
NIP [c000000000456048] __kmalloc_node+0x108/0x790
LR [c000000000455fd4] __kmalloc_node+0x94/0x790
Call Trace:
kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110
mem_cgroup_css_online+0x10c/0x270
online_css+0x48/0xd0
cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2c4/0x470
cgroup_mkdir+0x408/0x5f0
kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0x100
vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x250
do_mkdirat+0x154/0x1c0
system_call_exception+0xf8/0x200
system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c
Instruction dump:
e93e0000 e90d0030 39290008 7cc9402a e94d0030 e93e0000 7ce95214 7f89502a
2fbc0000 419e0018 41920230 e9270010 <89290007> 7f994800 419e0220 7ee6bb78
This pointing to the following code:
mm/slub.c:2851
if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) {
c000000000456038: 00 00 bc 2f cmpdi cr7,r28,0
c00000000045603c: 18 00 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456054 <__kmalloc_node+0x114>
node_match():
mm/slub.c:2491
if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && page_to_nid(page) != node)
c000000000456040: 30 02 92 41 beq cr4,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330>
page_to_nid():
include/linux/mm.h:1294
c000000000456044: 10 00 27 e9 ld r9,16(r7)
c000000000456048: 07 00 29 89 lbz r9,7(r9) <<<< r9 = NULL
node_match():
mm/slub.c:2491
c00000000045604c: 00 48 99 7f cmpw cr7,r25,r9
c000000000456050: 20 02 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330>
The panic occurred in slab_alloc_node() when checking for the page's node:
object = c->freelist;
page = c->page;
if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) {
object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c);
stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
The issue is that object is not NULL while page is NULL which is odd but
may happen if the cache flush happened after loading object but before
loading page. Thus checking for the page pointer is required too.
The cache flush is done through an inter processor interrupt when a
piece of memory is off-lined. That interrupt is triggered when a memory
hot-unplug operation is initiated and offline_pages() is calling the
slub's MEM_GOING_OFFLINE callback slab_mem_going_offline_callback()
which is calling flush_cpu_slab(). If that interrupt is caught between
the reading of c->freelist and the reading of c->page, this could lead
to such a situation. That situation is expected and the later call to
this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() will detect the change to c->freelist and redo
the whole operation.
In commit 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in
node_match()") check on the page pointer has been removed assuming that
page is always valid when it is called. It happens that this is not
true in that particular case, so check for page before calling
node_match() here.
Fixes: 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in node_match()")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>
Cc: Scott Cheloha <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Hurricos
pushed a commit
to Hurricos/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2020
This fix is for a failure that occurred in the DWARF unwind perf test.
Stack unwinders may probe memory when looking for frames.
Memory sanitizer will poison and track uninitialized memory on the
stack, and on the heap if the value is copied to the heap.
This can lead to false memory sanitizer failures for the use of an
uninitialized value.
Avoid this problem by removing the poison on the copied stack.
The full msan failure with track origins looks like:
==2168==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x559ceb10755b in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
GalliumOS#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
GalliumOS#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
GalliumOS#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
GalliumOS#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106acf in __libdwfl_frame_reg_set elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:77:22
#1 0x559ceb106acf in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:627:13
GalliumOS#2 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
GalliumOS#3 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
GalliumOS#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
GalliumOS#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#9 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#10 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#11 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#12 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#13 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#14 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#15 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#16 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#21 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#22 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#23 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#24 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106a54 in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:613:9
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
GalliumOS#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
GalliumOS#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
GalliumOS#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
GalliumOS#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceaff8800 in memory_read tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:156:10
#1 0x559ceb10f053 in expr_eval elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:501:13
GalliumOS#2 0x559ceb1060cc in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:603:18
GalliumOS#3 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
GalliumOS#4 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
GalliumOS#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#9 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#10 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#11 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#12 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#13 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#14 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#15 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#16 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#17 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#19 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#21 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#22 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#23 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#24 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#25 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559cea9027d9 in __msan_memcpy llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1558:3
#1 0x559cea9d2185 in sample_ustack tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:41:2
GalliumOS#2 0x559cea9d202c in test__arch_unwind_sample tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:72:9
GalliumOS#3 0x559ceabc9cbd in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:106:6
GalliumOS#4 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
GalliumOS#5 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#6 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#7 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#8 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#9 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#10 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#11 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#12 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#13 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#14 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#15 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#16 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#17 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'bf' in the stack frame of function 'perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events'
#0 0x559ceafc5f60 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c:445
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 in handle_cfi
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sandeep Dasgupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Hurricos
pushed a commit
to Hurricos/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2020
Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result GalliumOS#2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result GalliumOS#3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result GalliumOS#4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result GalliumOS#5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Patches backported from upstream, tested and working.
Now cros_ec_lpc is being loaded, and so, accelerometer sensors are available to userspace. This should allow iio-sensor-proxy to work (for gnome users), but also make possible to use programs like 2in1screen (https://github.com/aleozlx/2in1screen) that could enable autorotation on xfce.
@reynhout I'd like to draw attention to the kernel version. 4.16 is EOL for almost an year, and so, hasn't got any security patches since then. We should either go back to 4.15 (which is being supported by canonical, since its their LTS kernel), or upgrade to 4.19 (which may break some stuff...)