Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Std-lib support for ZK opcodes #6832

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: feature/zk-opcodes
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bitzoic
Copy link
Member

@bitzoic bitzoic commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

This PR adds support for the ecop and epar opcodes in the std-lib. It also introduces the Point2D and Scalar type support cryptographic operations.

The new crypto module follows the same format as developed in #5747 which is still yet to come, ensuring compatibility. The Point2D and Scalar types also use Bytes under the hood to ensure future curves with points larger than 32 bytes are still supported.

Checklist

  • I have linked to any relevant issues.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book).
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary Breaking* or New Feature labels where relevant.
  • I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards.
  • I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.

@bitzoic bitzoic added enhancement New feature or request lib: std Standard library labels Jan 14, 2025
@bitzoic bitzoic self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@bitzoic bitzoic marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 09:22
@bitzoic bitzoic requested review from a team as code owners January 22, 2025 09:22
bitzoic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
## Description

This PR replaces #5747 and intends
to introduce the crypto module.

> Note: #6832 will also use the
crypto module.

The std-lib currently contains the `ecr.sw` and `vm/evm/ecr.sw` files
which have the following functions:

- ec_recover()
- ec_recover_r1()
- ed_verify()
- ec_recover_address()
- ec_recover_address_r1()
- ec_recover_evm_address()

There are a number of issues with this including no type safety for
signatures from different elliptic curves, functions split across
multiple files, poor naming, and generic arguments. All of these are
resolved by this PR which deprecates both `ecr.sw` files and replaces
them with a crypto module which syntactically matches Rust.

The following new types are introduced:

* `PublicKey` - An Asymmetric public key, supporting both 64 and 32-byte
public keys
* `Message` - Hashed message authenticated by a signature type that
handles variable lengths
* `Secp256k1` - A secp256k1 signature
* `Secp256r1` - A secp256r1 signature
* `Ed25519` -  An ed25519 signature
* `Signature` - An ECDSA signature

All original functionality is retained with the new module:

* `Secp256k1::recover()` - Recovers a public key.
* `Secp256r1::recover()` - Recovers a public key.
* `Secp256k1::address()` - Recovers an address.
* `Secp256r1::address()` - Recovers an address.
* `Secp256k1::evm_address()` - Recovers an EVM address.
* `Ed25519::verify()` - Verify that a signature matches the given public
key.

The following new functionality has been added:

* `Secp256k1::verify()` - Verify that a signature matches the given
public key.
* `Secp256r1::verify()` - Verify that a signature matches the given
public key.
* `Secp256k1::verify_address()` - Verify that a signature matches the
given address.
* `Secp256r1::verify_address()` - Verify that a signature matches the
given address.
* `Secp256k1::verify_evm_address()` - Verify that a signature matches
the given EVM address.
* `Secp256r1::verify_evm_address()` - Verify that a signature matches
the given EVM address.
* `Secp256r1::evm_address()` - Recovers an EVM address.

The following functions have been deprecated: 

- `std::ecr::ec_recover()`
- `std::ecr::ec_recover_r1()`
- `std::ecr::ed_verify()`
- `std::ecr::ec_recover_address()`
- `std::ecr::ec_recover_address_r1()`
- `std::vm::evm::ecr::ec_recover_evm_address()`

Example of changes for recovering a public key:
```sway
// Before
fn foo(signature: B512, message: b256) {
     let recovered_public_key: B512 = ec_recover(signature, message).unwrap();
}

// After
fn bar(signature: Signature, message: Message) {
     let recovered_public_key: PublicKey = signature.recover(message).unwrap();
}
```

Example of changes for recovering an Address:
```sway
// Before
fn foo(signature: B512, message: b256) {
     let recovered_address: Address = ec_recover_address(signature, message).unwrap();
}

// After
fn bar(signature: Signature, message: Message) {
     let recovered_address: Address = signature.address(message).unwrap();
}
```

Complete recovery example using the `Signature` type:

```sway
use std::crypto::{Message, PublicKey, Secp256r1, Signature};

fn foo() {
    let secp256r1_signature = Signature::Secp256r1(Secp256r1::from((
        0xbd0c9b8792876712afadbff382e1bf31c44437823ed761cc3600d0016de511ac,
        0x44ac566bd156b4fc71a4a4cb2655d3da360c695edb27dc3b64d621e122fea23d,
    )));
    let signed_message = Message::from(0x1e45523606c96c98ba970ff7cf9511fab8b25e1bcd52ced30b81df1e4a9c4323);
    
    // A recovered public key pair.
    let secp256r1_public_key = secp256r1_signature.recover(signed_message);
    assert(secp256r1_public_key.is_ok());
    assert(
        secp256r1_public_key
            .unwrap() == PublicKey::from((
            0xd6ea577a54ae42411fbc78d686d4abba2150ca83540528e4b868002e346004b2,
            0x62660ecce5979493fe5684526e8e00875b948e507a89a47096bc84064a175452,
        )),
    );
}
```

## Checklist

- [x] I have linked to any relevant issues.
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas.
- [x] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the
reference, and the Sway book).
- [x] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have
[requested support from the DevRel
team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose)
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works.
- [x] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary
`Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant.
- [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs
Code Review
Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md).
- [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lib: std Standard library
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant