Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes double call of get_items_for_type. #6626

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

esdrubal
Copy link
Contributor

@esdrubal esdrubal commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

Checklist

  • I have linked to any relevant issues.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book).
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary Breaking* or New Feature labels where relevant.
  • I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards.
  • I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.

@esdrubal esdrubal self-assigned this Oct 9, 2024
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 9, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #6626 will not alter performance

Comparing esdrubal/double_find_method_for_type_call (0244ef2) with master (95a86ec)

Summary

✅ 22 untouched benchmarks

@esdrubal esdrubal force-pushed the esdrubal/double_find_method_for_type_call branch from 2e5ef5c to 0cd912d Compare February 3, 2025 13:43
@esdrubal esdrubal force-pushed the esdrubal/double_find_method_for_type_call branch from 0cd912d to 3d7b4bb Compare February 3, 2025 13:44
@esdrubal esdrubal force-pushed the esdrubal/double_find_method_for_type_call branch from 3d7b4bb to 0244ef2 Compare February 3, 2025 14:00
@esdrubal esdrubal marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 14:43
@esdrubal esdrubal requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant