-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
feat!: add possibility to place a predefined gas amount for predicate #1655
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AurelienFT
wants to merge
4
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
add_predicate_gas_used_custom
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ pub enum Input { | |
resource: CoinType, | ||
code: Vec<u8>, | ||
data: Vec<u8>, | ||
gas_used: u64, | ||
}, | ||
Contract { | ||
utxo_id: UtxoId, | ||
|
@@ -36,6 +37,21 @@ impl Input { | |
resource, | ||
code, | ||
data, | ||
gas_used: 0, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub const fn resource_predicate_with_gas( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. As it is already a breaking change I would add the |
||
resource: CoinType, | ||
code: Vec<u8>, | ||
data: Vec<u8>, | ||
gas_used: u64, | ||
) -> Self { | ||
Self::ResourcePredicate { | ||
resource, | ||
code, | ||
data, | ||
gas_used, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a breaking change unless we annotated this previously with the
non_exhaustive
attribute.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding
non_exhaustive
also makes this change a breaking change, but prevents breaking changes in the future, was that intended?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in any case, having
non_exhaustive
only on one enum variant makes it a little annoying for the consumer of this library, so perhaps we can just annotate the whole enum with it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I wanted this to be non breaking. Removed for now. Making the PR draft because I might not need it