Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make ngx_postgres possible to build as dynamic module #54

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Make ngx_postgres possible to build as dynamic module #54

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cryptofuture
Copy link

Tested in production. I also updated version checks.

ngx_feature_test="(void) PQescapeLiteral(NULL, NULL, 0);
printf(\"$lib_version\")"
. auto/feature
fi
Copy link
Contributor

@agentzh agentzh Dec 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will you please explain these changes? I prefer minimal changes. Thanks!

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does everything else look good?

@cryptofuture
Copy link
Author

PostgreSQL 9.2 released more then 4 years ago! I didn't seen questions for older then 9.4 version for a year on pgsql-admin. We have check per 9.1 and thats even an overkill. Longer check list makes config file harder to understand. Original config was made 6 years ago, many things changed in the world since then! There no any logical reason to support check per 8.0 postgresql version
btw, pls check fix build with 1.11.6 request, I changed that line.

@agentzh
Copy link
Contributor

agentzh commented Jan 3, 2017

@cryptofuture Pull requests should be atomic and minimized. It's not good practice to include unrelated changes. If you think we should drop version checks against older Pg, then it deserves a separate dedicated pull request I'm afraid.

@jmealo
Copy link

jmealo commented Aug 16, 2018

@cryptofuture: thank you for your work! Do you have time to split this PR into two separate ones as requested by @agentzh?

@kvishnivetsky
Copy link

I'm interested in this feature. Is this PR still alive?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants