Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implicit version of the 2Din3DHW solver #229

Open
oparry-ukaea opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #232
Open

Implicit version of the 2Din3DHW solver #229

oparry-ukaea opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #232
Assignees

Comments

@oparry-ukaea
Copy link
Contributor

Integrate the implicit implementation of nektar-driftwave into the 2Din3DHW equation system.

@oparry-ukaea oparry-ukaea self-assigned this Apr 8, 2024
@oparry-ukaea oparry-ukaea added this to the neso-hw-impurity-transport milestone Apr 10, 2024
@oparry-ukaea
Copy link
Contributor Author

This works within nektar-driftwave.
i.e. I can convert the (2D-in-2D) implicit implementation to 2D-in-3D and it runs with the same mesh, ICs as the NESO eg).

The implementation in NESO fails (non-linear solver fails to converge), and isn't trivial to diff against driftwave...
currently trying to debug.

@oparry-ukaea oparry-ukaea linked a pull request Apr 12, 2024 that will close this issue
9 tasks
@oparry-ukaea oparry-ukaea removed this from the neso-hw-impurity-transport milestone Apr 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant