Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add osi and fsf values for allow-osi-fsf-free config #531

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2023

Conversation

zkxs
Copy link
Contributor

@zkxs zkxs commented Jul 23, 2023

This PR resolves #210 by adding osi and fsf as new values for allow-osi-fsf-free. This allows for the use case where a cargo-deny user wants to blanket allow all FSF licenses while not caring about OSI (or vice versa).

This PR resolves EmbarkStudios#210 by adding `osi` and `fsf` as  new values for `allow-osi-fsf-free. This allows for the use case where a cargo-deny user wants to blanket allow all FSF licenses while not caring about OSI (or vice versa).
@zkxs zkxs requested a review from Jake-Shadle as a code owner July 23, 2023 15:47
Copy link
Member

@Jake-Shadle Jake-Shadle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@Jake-Shadle Jake-Shadle merged commit dbba1dc into EmbarkStudios:main Jul 25, 2023
7 of 10 checks passed
zkxs added a commit to zkxs/cargo-deny that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
I had initially patterned the check on `OsiOnly` and `FsfOnly` before realizing that perhaps deny!() didn't make sense here, and I removed it (or so I thought). It seems I blundered and left one in--sorry.

I believe this deny!() shouldn't be here.

Apologies for the mistake...

(Also, thanks for catching that other mistake I made in EmbarkStudios#531 Jake)
zkxs added a commit to zkxs/cargo-deny that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
I had initially patterned the new license checks on `OsiOnly` and `FsfOnly` before realizing that perhaps deny!() didn't make sense here, and I removed it (or so I thought). It seems I blundered and left one in--sorry.

I believe this deny!() shouldn't be here.

Apologies for the mistake...

(Also, thanks for catching that other mistake I made in EmbarkStudios#531 Jake)
@zkxs zkxs mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2023
Jake-Shadle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
I had initially patterned the new license checks on `OsiOnly` and
`FsfOnly` before realizing that perhaps deny!() didn't make sense here,
and I removed it (or so I thought). It seems I blundered and left one
in--sorry.

I believe this deny!() shouldn't be here.

Apologies for the mistake... I thought I'd double-checked my diff but it
seems I did a poor job of it.

(Also, thanks for catching that other mistake I made in #531 Jake)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expand configuration of license approval
2 participants