Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade archiver from 5.3.1 to 5.3.2 #52

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DrPaulBrewer
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade archiver from 5.3.1 to 5.3.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 5 days ago, on 2023-08-17.
Release notes
Package name: archiver from archiver GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: archiver
  • 692be04 bump version for release
  • e071f4c Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 3ec570f Bump async from 3.2.3 to 3.2.4 (#596)
  • 7eb65bb Bump minimatch from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2 (#669)
  • aca1771 Bump readdir-glob from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2 (#604)
  • 7dac85e Delete appveyor.yml
  • b9011f3 Bump tar from 6.1.11 to 6.1.13 (#631)
  • 3a2270a Bump rimraf from 3.0.2 to 4.3.1 (#660)
  • 55c657e Bump mkdirp from 1.0.4 to 2.1.5 (#657)
  • b22a7e3 Bump chai from 4.3.6 to 4.3.7 (#627)
  • 93ee6f4 Bump actions/setup-node from 3.1.1 to 3.6.0 (#638)
  • f5d700f Bump release-drafter/release-drafter from 5.19.0 to 5.23.0 (#652)
  • b094231 test: run tests against node 18 (#637)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants