-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Devolución TP2 #2
base: feedback2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Te dejé un par de comentarios.
filter(!is.na(puntos)) |> | ||
filter(!is.na(precio)) |> | ||
group_by(puntos) |> | ||
summarise(precio_promedio = mean(precio, na.rm = TRUE)) |> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
En el gráfico anterior se ve que la distribución de precios tiene algunos pocos valores muy altos pero muchos con valores bajos. Quizás en vez del promedio, podés probar con la mediana.
informe.Rmd
Outdated
Vamos a ver si existe algun otro rasgo relevante de la relación puntaje y precio. Primeramente creamos una nueva variable que las relacione: | ||
```{r} | ||
vinos_ratio <- vinos |> | ||
mutate(ratio = precio*puntos*0.01) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No entiendo qué vendría a representar esta variable. Quizás habría que explicar un poco de donde sale y qué significa.
Gracias por los comentarios! Actualicé la 2da entrega, analizando la 3ra hipótesis y corrigiendo varias cosas. Luego veo de añadir este feedback. |
No description provided.