-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: [potigol] - implementação qual_tipo #528
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Está no caminho certo. Pedi alguns ajustes.
fontes/avaliador-sintatico/dialetos/potigol/avaliador-sintatico-potigol.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fontes/avaliador-sintatico/dialetos/potigol/avaliador-sintatico-potigol.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fontes/avaliador-sintatico/dialetos/potigol/avaliador-sintatico-potigol.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ajustes QualTipo Potigol Ajustes QualTipo Potigol Ajustes QualTipo Potigol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Muito show. Parabéns pela primeira entrega!
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ describe('Avaliador sintático', () => { | |||
expect(retornoAvaliadorSintatico.declaracoes).toHaveLength(1); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('Sucesso - Operações encadeadas', () => { | |||
it.only('Sucesso - Operações encadeadas', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@samuelrvg esse it.only
deveria continuar aqui?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pablotdv Na branch principal esta normal, sem o .only
pelo que ví aqui.
resolve #529