feat: 660 create an example to run damages and losses without input files

[ArdtK]

Issue addressed

Solves #660

Code of conduct

• I HAVE NOT added sensitive or compromised (test) data to the repository.
• I HAVE NOT added vulnerabilities to the repository.
• I HAVE discussed my solution with (other) members of the RA2CE team.

What has been done?

• Remove check in input files in init of Losses
• Move creation of analysis_collection to Ra2ceHandler.configure so the analyses can be manipulated between the init and the execute.
• Refactor readers (shouldn't be dataclasses - wrongly changed in feat: 595 adaptation run and combine losses and damages #616)
• Add an example notebook to prove running Damages and Losses without input files is possible.

Checklist

• Code is formatted using our custom black and isort definitions.
• Tests are either added or updated.
• Branch is up to date with master.
• Updated documentation if needed.

Additional Notes (optional)

Add any additional notes or information that may be helpful.

[MatthiasHauthDeltares]

This is a really nice start!
A few observations/comments:

• I find it difficult to figure out what are the keys in the dictionaries made of Enum:

list(_resilience_curves.resilience_curves.keys())[0]

returns the key: (<RoadTypeEnum.SECONDARY: 7>, (0.0, 0.2)),
This comment is also valid for _values_of_time and _traffic_intensities

• For the damage curve:

_manual_damage_functions.damage_functions["all_road_types"].damage_fraction.data

This should probably only contains the data as a numpy array instead of a weird dataframe with 2 rows for the title.
Same comment for _manual_damage_functions.damage_functions["all_road_types"].max_damage

[ArdtK]

@MatthiasHauthDeltares the keys of _resilience_curves are a composite (tupe) of a link_type (enum) and a hazard intensity range (list[float]).
For _values_of_time and _traffic_intensities it is quite straighforward, isn't it.

Regarding your comment on the damage function, it returns an interpolator.

We could discuss how to improve/clarify this.

@sahand-asgarpour FYI

[Carsopre]

There are some remarks that need attention, specially behavioral changes to the analysis_runner_factory.py.