Skip to content

perf: improve performance of code-to-function lookups [backport 2.21] #13400

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2025

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 205fd1e from #13393 to 2.21.

We increase the LRU cache size of the function-for-code lookup to avoid potentially excessive churn. The default size of 128 might be too small since it is a cache on a utility function that is shared by many other components.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

We increase the LRU cache size of the function-for-code lookup to avoid
potentially excessive churn. The default size of 128 might be too small
since it is a cache on a utility function that is shared by many other
components.

## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

(cherry picked from commit 205fd1e)
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from a team as code owners May 13, 2025 12:49
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 closed this May 13, 2025
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 reopened this May 13, 2025
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2025 13:25
Copy link
Contributor Author

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/prf-functions_for_code-9634ef79190978cf.yaml         @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/internal/utils/inspection.py                                    @DataDog/apm-core-python

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 13, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-05-15 19:54:37

Comparing candidate commit 941b454 in PR branch backport-13393-to-2.21 with baseline commit 91b8f48 in branch 2.21.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 344 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 merged commit d141a48 into 2.21 May 15, 2025
869 checks passed
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 deleted the backport-13393-to-2.21 branch May 15, 2025 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants