Dasharo Product Naming Convention - Pro Package change

[Stanislaw-bnk]

No description provided.

[pietrushnic]

Two things:

• it should probably depend on https://github.com/Dasharo/docs/pull/820/files
• Dasharo Product Naming Convention - Pro Package change 3mdeb/3mdeb-website#158 (comment)

Maybe we should use the Dasharo Pro/Enterprise Package? Or is this too convoluted?

[artur-rs]

@Stanislaw-bnk such naming scheme change should be correctly communicated to the current and future users, maybe even the standalone S&M campaign for such changes

[pietrushnic]

@artur-rs, it was communicated during DUG, so SM campaign or newsletter messaging could be prepared based on that.

[Stanislaw-bnk]

@pietrushnic @artur-rs I would keep the Dasharo Pro Package without Enterprise, as that is the package we have listed in the store.

[pietrushnic]

@Stanislaw-bnk I'm okay with that. We should explain it; if there are places where there is confusion, we could link to convention documentation. In conventional documentation, give a link to the updated TOS, which explains the difference in terms of support.

[Stanislaw-bnk]

@artur-rs Seems like this is ready for merge? However, @pietrushnic your approval is still missing, as it’s currently awaiting requested review from pietrushnic.

As for the point In conventional documentation, give a link to the updated TOS, which explains the difference in terms of support, I see that there is no mention in the Dasharo Terms of Service differentiating between the Pro and Enterprise Packages, where PRO is only for personal use up to 5 units, and ENTERPRISE is for personal use above 5 units or for companies from the first unit. Shouldn't it be mentioned in the ToS? @gosiastyba

[rafkoch]

@pietrushnic we need Your approval because now we see info: "requested review from pietrushnic"

[pietrushnic]

@rafkoch That's okay, but please take a look at how many conflicts were created over that time. Those have to be resolved before I can approve.