[charts/redis-ha] fix: redis and haproxy and busybox image was migrated from docker hub to public ecr for docker hub rate limit

[kahirokunn]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue this PR fixes

(optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)

• fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

[Place an '[x]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.]

• DCO signed
• Chart Version bumped
• Variables are documented in the README.md
• Title of the PR starts with chart name (e.g. [stable/mychartname])

[DandyDeveloper]

@kahirokunn I'm not seeing any mentions of this being an official migration?

https://hub.docker.com/_/redis

Can you throw me something confirming this as an official migration?

[kahirokunn]

@DandyDeveloper https://aws.amazon.com/jp/blogs/news/docker-official-images-now-available-on-amazon-elastic-container-registry-public/

Is this information sufficient?

[mhkarimi1383]

What about Google's cache proxy for DockerHub?
But this is a bit specific to users for example I'm using my own docker registry docker.karimi.dev :)
or some users bought docker hub account

[DandyDeveloper]

@kahirokunn I'm gonna see if I can dig and find an official word that its right to use this. Sorry for the delay.

[34fathombelow]

@DandyDeveloper I did find an official announcement from docker.

I think it's best to leave it to the default of docker.io/library to avoid confusion. Personally it makes no difference to me, but I do not believe public.ecr.aws/docker/library/ is widely known or adopted in the community yet.

[kahirokunn]

If you are considering a rate limit, I would suggest using a registry that is mirrored by docker.io. AWS, GCP, GitHub, whatever, but a trusted and proven organization is preferred.

In fact I got stuck with docker.io's rate limit and failed in production.

[DandyDeveloper]

I think we're in a significantly better place now than we were 2 years ago to merge this in :) I've updated to the official ECR repos now.

[mhkarimi1383]

@kahirokunn
Are you sure that bitnami images are Ok?

[DandyDeveloper]

@kahirokunn CI says no, and that was a mistake on my part! Sorry!

[mhkarimi1383]

@kahirokunn CI says no, and that was a mistake on my part! Sorry!

That's because paths and user accesses are not standard.
Why using Bitnami?

[DandyDeveloper]

@mhkarimi1383 Because I messed up the commit. :)

[mhkarimi1383]

@mhkarimi1383 Because I messed up the commit. :)

I mean I would prefer using official images since bitnami images are non root and non standard

[DandyDeveloper]

@mhkarimi1383 Yes. I am using the official ones. We don't want Bitnami. I committed the wrong images (See latest commit)

[kahirokunn]

Thx!