Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a devdeps figure build #448

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Add a devdeps figure build #448

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

Cadair
Copy link
Member

@Cadair Cadair commented Oct 17, 2024

We should test our figures against at least astropy main

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 17, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #448 will not alter performance

Comparing Cadair:figure_devdeps (e718993) with main (351e2c2)

Summary

✅ 9 untouched benchmarks

@Cadair Cadair added the No Changelog Entry Needed This pull request does not need a changelog entry label Oct 17, 2024
@Cadair Cadair requested a review from SolarDrew October 17, 2024 14:41
figure-!devdeps: matplotlib==3.9.1
figure-!devdeps: mpl-animators==1.1.1
figure-!devdeps: astropy==6.1.1
figure-!devdeps: ndcube==2.2.2
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should these packages not be pinned for figure-devdeps as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We install all the git versions of them instead, so we can't have both.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yes, I see. Well then won't that (potentially) lead to figure differences as the packages change on git?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah some of the differences could be something irrelevant has changed upstream, or it could be a legitimate API change. Unfortunately there's no way to test the latter without running the risk of the former. fwiw, random hash breakages don't seem to happen that much on astropy/sunpy.

@SolarDrew
Copy link
Contributor

One small question, otherwise looks fine 👍

@Cadair Cadair merged commit af56c3a into DKISTDC:main Oct 17, 2024
21 checks passed
@Cadair Cadair deleted the figure_devdeps branch October 17, 2024 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
No Changelog Entry Needed This pull request does not need a changelog entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants