Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 5, 2021. It is now read-only.

Test failure for secret creation when backend fails. #107

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2020

Conversation

allanmoso
Copy link
Contributor

This is to improve the test coverage for the controllers/secrets/externalsecret_controller.go as part of #103

This is as much as I can do for now. The only other parts in the code that is not covered by unit test is inside the Reconcile loop.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #107 into master will increase coverage by 1.14%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #107      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.44%   86.59%   +1.14%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         261      261              
==========================================
+ Hits          223      226       +3     
+ Misses         28       26       -2     
+ Partials       10        9       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
controllers/secrets/externalsecret_controller.go 80.28% <0.00%> (+4.22%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2278d13...db3bd91. Read the comment docs.

@allanmoso allanmoso closed this Oct 17, 2020
@allanmoso allanmoso reopened this Oct 17, 2020
@knelasevero knelasevero merged commit f08109d into ContainerSolutions:master Oct 19, 2020
@amouat
Copy link

amouat commented Oct 21, 2020

@allanmoso this PR qualifies for our Hacktoberfest campaign! See https://blog.container-solutions.com/container-solutions-does-hacktoberfest for more details.

(Allan replied so removing my e-mail)

amouat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2021
…8s.io/apimachinery-0.21.0

chore(deps): bump k8s.io/apimachinery from 0.20.5 to 0.21.0
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants