Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update requirements.txt #46

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update requirements.txt #46

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Contributor

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Oct 7, 2024

PR Type

dependencies


Description

  • Removed the specific version constraint for the Unidecode package in requirements.txt, allowing for any version to be used.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
requirements.txt
Relax version constraint for `Unidecode` dependency           

requirements.txt

  • Removed specific version constraint for Unidecode.
  • Updated Unidecode to allow any version.
  • +1/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2024

    PR-Agent failed to apply 'local' repo settings

    The configuration file needs to be a valid TOML, please fix it.


    Error message:
    'int' object has no attribute 'items'

    Configuration content:
    aaa=3
    
    [pr_reviewer]
    extra_instructions = ""
    enable_review_labels_security = false
    enable_review_labels_effort = false
    require_can_be_split_review = true
    enable_auto_approval = true
    maximal_review_effort = 1
    

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Dependency Management
    Removing the version constraint for Unidecode may lead to compatibility issues with other packages or the project itself, depending on future updates of Unidecode.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    mrT23 commented Oct 7, 2024

    /improve

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Latest suggestions up to 001b276

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Ensure version consistency and predictability by specifying a version for the 'Unidecode' package

    Specify a version for the 'Unidecode' package to ensure consistent, predictable
    builds and avoid potential compatibility issues with future versions.

    requirements.txt [3]

    -Unidecode
    +Unidecode==1.3
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Specifying a version for the 'Unidecode' package is crucial for ensuring consistent and predictable builds, preventing potential compatibility issues with future versions. This suggestion directly addresses a best practice in dependency management.

    9

    Previous suggestions

    Suggestions up to commit 001b276
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Ensure version consistency and prevent future compatibility issues by specifying a package version

    Specify a version for the 'Unidecode' package to ensure consistent, predictable
    builds and avoid potential compatibility issues with future versions.

    requirements.txt [3]

    -Unidecode
    +Unidecode==1.3
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Specifying a version for the 'Unidecode' package is a best practice that ensures consistent builds and prevents compatibility issues with future versions. This suggestion is highly relevant and improves the reliability of the codebase.

    9

    @mrT23 mrT23 closed this Oct 25, 2024
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the mrT23-patch-7 branch October 25, 2024 14:19
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant