Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of going through all cells to get their tile options, we keep the grid (like a cache of options), and only modify cells that might have changed, leaving aside cells we are sure are unchanged.
Idea:
We start from the picked cell, and we check its neighbours. For each neighbour (up, right, down, left), if the list of options has changed, we add its own neighbours to the list of cells to check. If it didn't change, we just skip its neighbours.
It is more accurate than going through the old grid because it propagates changes until we arrive to a stable state.
In the old way, we only check cells once, according to the state at t-1. It seems to me it is reducing the options of the last pick only.
Bonus: since the drawing of cells now a lot of time compared to choosing the next tile, we can have several updates per draw, which speeds considerably the process.
Here with 1 update per tick, DIM = 25, size = 400x400
Here with 10 updates per tick, DIM = 50, size = 800x800
Here with 1000 updates per tick, DIM = 200, size = 800x800