If you discover a security vulnerability in Cockpit, please review the following guidelines before submitting a report. We take security very seriously, and we do our best to resolve security issues as quickly as possible.

While working to identify potential security vulnerabilities in Cockpit, we ask that you:

• Privately share any issues that you discover with us via [email protected] as soon as possible.
• Give us a reasonable amount of time to address any reported issues before publicizing them.
• Only report issues that are in scope.
• Provide a quality report with precise explanations and concrete attack scenarios.

We are only interested in vulnerabilities that affect Cockpit itself, tested against your own local installation of the software, running the latest version. Do not test against any Cockpit installation that you don’t own.

• Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
• Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
• Arbitrary Code Execution
• Privilege Escalation
• Session Hijacking

• Reports from automated tools or scanners
• Theoretical attacks without actual proof of exploitability
• Attacks that can be guarded against by following our security recommendations.
• Server configuration issues outside of Cockpit’s control
• Denial of Service attacks
• Brute force attacks (e.g. on password, username or email address enumeration)
• Social engineering of Agentejo staff or users of Cockpit installations
• Physical attacks against Cockpit installations
• Attacks involving physical access to a user’s device, or involving a device or network that is already seriously compromised (e.g. man-in-the-middle attacks)
• Attacks that are the result of a 3rd party Cockpit addon should be reported to the addon’s author
• Attacks that are the result of a 3rd party library should be reported to the library maintainers
• Bugs that rely on an unlikely user interaction (i.e. the user effectively attacking themselves)
• Disclosure of tools or libraries used by Cockpit and/or their versions
• Issues that are the result of a user doing something silly (like sharing their password publicly)
• Missing security headers which do not lead directly to a vulnerability via proof of concept
• Vulnerabilities affecting users of outdated/unsupported browsers or platforms
• Vulnerabilities affecting outdated versions of Cockpit
• Any behavior that is clearly documented.
• Issues discovered while scanning a site you don’t own without permission
• Missing CSRF tokens on forms (unless you have a proof of concept, many forms either don't need CSRF or are mitigated in other ways) and "logout" CSRF attacks
• Open redirects