Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New CAIP - Community-Powered Assessment of Trust in Discrete Resources (Split of former: Community-powered trust assessment in software components) #271

Open
wants to merge 74 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dayksx
Copy link
Contributor

@dayksx dayksx commented Mar 26, 2024

Initial proposal for a data framework to represent assertions for evaluating discrete resources.

This proposal emerges from the division of the original CAIP, specifically CAIP Community-powered trust assessment in software components, into three separate CAIPs for more focused discussions and development:

  • CAIP-261: Web of Trust Primitives (originally discussed in PR 261)
  • CAIP-x: Community-Powered Assessment of Trust in Discrete Resources (this PR)
  • CAIP-y: Community-Powered Assessment of Trust in Software Components (a PR will be created based on the content from this branch)

Feedback and comments from the original discussion on CAIP-261 have been considered and addressed in the development of this new proposal.

dayksx and others added 30 commits March 7, 2024 15:58
Co-authored-by: Mircea Nistor <[email protected]>
Change DID specification in order to accommodate any key par based identifier for peers
Setting DIDs for each IDs prevents a malicious actor from "injecting" into the trust computer a credential with a matching ID but referring to something completely different.
Co-authored-by: Mircea Nistor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mircea Nistor <[email protected]>
…ite-to-generalize

Chain agnostic editorial/pr 261 rewrite to generalize
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants