Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/parallelize ngrams #1267

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged

Feature/parallelize ngrams #1267

merged 15 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

BeritJanssen
Copy link
Contributor

Close #1005 .

@BeritJanssen BeritJanssen force-pushed the feature/parallelize-ngrams branch from 9cd2899 to 9b0ef82 Compare September 21, 2023 10:02
Copy link
Contributor

@lukavdplas lukavdplas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 😄

Note: I have not tried running this code, but I trust that you did. The code looks good (pending the failing test)!

A small nitpick on code quality: there are a lot of one-letter abbreviations as variable names (e.g. for r in results vs. for result in results), which I personally find detrimental to readability.

@BeritJanssen BeritJanssen merged commit 68446f5 into develop Sep 22, 2023
1 check passed
@BeritJanssen BeritJanssen deleted the feature/parallelize-ngrams branch September 22, 2023 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Parallellise ngram graph
2 participants