ENH: adding roman simulation density tutorial

[bsipocz]

I add this notebook to the pages now, but I would like to have the thumbs up from @jkrick and @vandesai1 about e.g the placing, etc.

Outstanding todos I noticed so far, but we should add to the list as they come up:

• rename download directory to data to have a bit more agreement amongst tutorials (this maybe a more overarching issue as the others may not be consistent yet either)
• We may want to say a bit more about the dataset, and link to the IRSA website of it, etc.

[jkrick]

I was thinking this notebook would fit under "Accessing IRSA’s on-premises holdings using VO protocols"

[bsipocz]

@jkrick - but it doesn't use VO protocols but the data dump in h5py files.

[bsipocz]

@jkrick - Hmm, I've just looked at the rendered plots and the last jackknife one is flat while the caption claims otherwise. Is that expected? I don't see any errors hit by the code cells.

[jkrick]

good catch! That plot will only look interesting if all the files are used, but we have it setup to just download and use 1 file. I can change the caption to reflect this.

I also see that I still need to move the functions out to a code_src type directory. Or would you rather leave it all as one file?

Let me know the order in which I should do these things, ie., wait for them to be on iras-tutorials and then write a PR or do a PR against the current ipac-sp-notebooks?

[bsipocz]

I also see that I still need to move the functions out to a code_src type directory. Or would you rather leave it all as one file?

We don't do code_src here, all the notebooks are expected to be self contained without outside code, or data, or requirements files.

Let me know the order in which I should do these things, ie., wait for them to be on iras-tutorials and then write a PR or do a PR against the current ipac-sp-notebooks?

A PR here would be preferable.

[jkrick]

ok, added issue #97 to remind me to change the figure caption once the notebook is merged here.