Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRDCDH-1187 Parse Model Property list Type #397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

amattu2
Copy link
Member

@amattu2 amattu2 commented Jun 6, 2024

Overview

This PR upgrades DMN to v1.1.31 which adds support for list model property types.

List WITHOUT acceptable values defined (before/after):

Table View > Study > Study > data_types

Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 11 43 54 AM Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 11 43 37 AM

List WITH acceptable values defined (before/after)

Table View > Data File > File > experimental_strategy_and_data_subtypes

Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 11 44 09 AM Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 11 44 27 AM

Change Details (Specifics)

Related Ticket(s)

CRDCDH-1187

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Jun 6, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9403884323

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 30.969%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9402667319: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1583
Relevant Lines: 4376

💛 - Coveralls

@amattu2 amattu2 added this to the 3.0.0 (PMVP-M1) milestone Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Alejandro-Vega Alejandro-Vega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Alejandro-Vega Alejandro-Vega merged commit 5944336 into 3.0.0 Jun 6, 2024
6 checks passed
@Alejandro-Vega Alejandro-Vega deleted the CRDCDH-1187 branch June 6, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants