Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GridTools v0.21.0 #5

Closed
wants to merge 53 commits into from

Conversation

havogt
Copy link
Contributor

@havogt havogt commented Mar 21, 2019

No description provided.

havogt added 30 commits December 1, 2016 10:47
git-subtree-dir: libs/googletest
git-subtree-split: a3ac2d7faa9cc6d38d69321f293925f72edf6727
git-subtree-dir: libs/serialbox
git-subtree-split: 9a5be99941d11841b34d0bf8b825721358f08c39
Template real type and remove dependency on DYCORE_USE_GPU
havogt and others added 23 commits December 6, 2016 17:26
add the option to read field from previous savepoint
When the field was already on device on a call to load_iteration is was not copied again.
and delete benchmarker which won't be used in the future
Support for new gridtools storage (gridtools v1.05.01).
Allows to use a user-defined error metric.

The old hard-coded error_metric is replaced by an interface but shipped as the default metric.
In serialbox2 we changed the management of masked dimensions during the "serialbox2 week". As a temporary solution I introduced this mask_for_killed_dimensions. However throwing the exception here, prevents that a proper exception is thrown later.
gridtools_verification was taking references to fields. this does not work nicely with passing gridtools data_stores by value.
Remove of & from register functions got lost.
Names of enum constants have changed and need to be renamed in this repo as well when updating the dycore to a new gridtools version.
* Supports `--gtest_color=(yes|no|auto)` in colored output from verification framework)
* Extend list of terminals (same as gtest)

Implements same color logic as gtest (on Linux).
@havogt havogt closed this Mar 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants